Philosophy Now Forum

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2025 9:25 am

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 1:24 amUnless the point is to create a constitutional crisis to be fought on grounds of your own choosing. To do that, you want to have a lot of judges issuing stays and then you just refuse to obey or enforce some of them. Be sure to pick only those fights that keep the MAGA blood pumping.

Try that and you quickly find that the rule of law is mostly a matter of conventions, not force - it's all just well behaved people not wanting to break the law. Dictators break it with impunity and then they blame judges and the laws for their transgressions.

This playbook has been written out for a number of years already. Here's the book...
The Dictator's Handbook: Why Bad Behavior is Almost Always Good Politics Paperback – 31 July 2012

For the American version of that, with some Paypal mafia tech bro fascism layered on top because money... see the video I linked a couple of days ago and check the description.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5RpPTRcz1no
Butterfly Revolution Step 3: Ignore the Courts

Trump represents the majority of Americans: Americans. He won the Popular Vote and has a clear, wide consensus. Only Fascists are trying to obstruct him at this point.

...are you a Fascist, D Pants? Who are you to stand in the way of Our Democracy?

The one known as "adolf hitler" may well have also represented 'the majority', of a 'group of people'. "adolf hitler", at the time, might have won the 'popular vote', and had a clear, wide consensus. Only 'some human beings' were trying to obstruct "adolf hitler" at 'that point'. BUT, SO WHAT?

SHOULD 'the rest' be FOLLOWING and/or ADMIRING 'the one' that 'the majority', who were/are TRICKED, DECEIVED, and FOOLED INTO FOLLOWING and ADMIRING?

Some people REALLY ARE JUST ABSOLUTELY BLINDED BY their OWN "one sidedness".

Age wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 12:25 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 11:38 pm I would love to know how removing male prisoners from female prisons is 'unconstitutional'. Which part of the constitution covers that?

Exactly. Only a disingenous, dog-in-the-manger fuckwit PRETENDS to not KNOW that 'male' and 'female' are self contained and self-explanatory--no further 'definition' needed.

Thanks

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 12:36 am

Age wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 12:25 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 11:38 pm I would love to know how removing male prisoners from female prisons is 'unconstitutional'. Which part of the constitution covers that?

Exactly. Only a disingenous, dog-in-the-manger fuckwit PRETENDS to not KNOW that 'male' and 'female' are self contained and self-explanatory--no further 'definition' needed.

Thanks

EXACTLY AS I SAID WOULD HAPPEN, 'this one' WOULD, ONCE AGAIN, PROOF 'me' ABSOLUTELY True, Right, Accurate, AND Correct, here.

My God u r a wanka.

Age wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 12:43 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 12:36 am

Age wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 12:25 am

Exactly. Only a disingenuous, dog-in-the-manger fuckwit PRETENDS to not KNOW that 'male' and 'female' are self contained and self-explanatory--no further 'definition' needed.

Thanks

I made a typo. I'm so SORRY darling. I stand by what I SAID. When I put on my suspenders, stockings, high heels and 2 dollar shop wig, it doesn't make me a woman, it makes me an over-sexed, perverted male fetishist.

No worries

Trump represents the majority of Americans: Americans. He won the Popular Vote and has a clear, wide consensus. Only Fascists are trying to obstruct him at this point.

Well no.

The majority of Americans did not vote for Trump.

Trump got 49.8% of the popular vote, Harris got 48.3% and the rest went to other candidates. So, the majority 50.2% voted against Trump.

phyllo wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 2:32 am

Trump represents the majority of Americans: Americans. He won the Popular Vote and has a clear, wide consensus. Only Fascists are trying to obstruct him at this point.

Well no.

The majority of Americans did not vote for Trump.

Trump got 49.8% of the popular vote, Harris got 48.3% and the rest went to other candidates. So, the majority 50.2% voted against Trump.

He won. That's all that matters. So why do you 'stand with Ukraine'? Is that just being woke, or do you genuinely understand what's going on there?

Age wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 12:16 am

Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 2:22 pm

Gary Childress wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2025 11:31 pm Are we sure Trump isn't working for our enemies?

It's the people who keep clamouring to stop the investigations that are the ones who are doing the fraud. That's obvious.

Correct me if I am WRONG, here...

We've tried. You're apparently not bright enough to be corrigible.

attofishpi wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 1:58 am My God u r a wanka.

If this is what you want to BELIEVE IS TRUE, then this is PERFECTLY FINE and OKAY, WITH me.

But, 'who' are you even referring to, EXACTLY?

And, MORE IMPORTANTLY, what are your, EXACT, REASONS for you BELIEVING that 'that' IS TRUE?

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 2:25 am

Age wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 12:43 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 12:36 am

Thanks

I made a typo. I'm so SORRY darling. I stand by what I SAID. When I put on my suspenders, stockings, high heels and 2 dollar shop wig, it doesn't make me a woman, it makes me an over-sexed, perverted male fetishist.

No worries

So, the ABSOLUTE IMMATURITY, LYING, and ATTEMPTS AT DECEIVING from 'this one' CONTINUE.

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 2:36 am

phyllo wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 2:32 am

Trump represents the majority of Americans: Americans. He won the Popular Vote and has a clear, wide consensus. Only Fascists are trying to obstruct him at this point.

Well no.

The majority of Americans did not vote for Trump.

Trump got 49.8% of the popular vote, Harris got 48.3% and the rest went to other candidates. So, the majority 50.2% voted against Trump.

He won. That's all that matters.

So, ONCE AGAIN, someone just CORRECTS another's Falsehood or Incorrect statement or claim and "accelafine" HAS TO RESPOND BY 'TRYING TO' RIDICULE what IS ESSENTIALLY JUST A CORRECTION.

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 2:36 am So why do you 'stand with Ukraine'? Is that just being woke, or do you genuinely understand what's going on there?

LOL "accelafine" STANDS BY ""sraelis" and them KILLING and MURDERING TENS of THOUSANDS of ABSOLUTELY INNOCENT BABIES, CHILDREN, WOMEN, and HUMAN BEINGS.

Is "accelafine" just being, so-called, WOKE, or does "accelafine" genuinely NOT understand what has been going on there?

Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 2:22 pm

Gary Childress wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2025 11:31 pm Are we sure Trump isn't working for our enemies?

It's the people who keep clamouring to stop the investigations that are the ones who are doing the fraud. That's obvious.

What do you mean by "stop the investigations"? Who is trying to stop investigations and what "investigations" are you referring to?

Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 2:53 am

Age wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 12:16 am

Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 2:22 pm
It's the people who keep clamouring to stop the investigations that are the ones who are doing the fraud. That's obvious.

Correct me if I am WRONG, here...

We've tried. You're apparently not bright enough to be corrigible.

For those who are ACTUALLY OPEN ENOUGH TO SEE MORE than JUST what they BELIEVE ONLY, here is the WHOLE SENTENCE:
Correct me if I am WRONG, here, but was it NOT some so-called "donald trump" who was CLAMORING to STOP the investigations into its OWN business dealings and tax debits or credits?

And, TO ONCE AGAIN SHOW and PROVE that 'these people', here, WOULD NOT JUST back up and support 'their CLAIMS and BELIEFS', I will ASK 'this one' to SHOW, EXACTLY, WHO, EXACTLY, has APPARENTLY TRIED TO CORRECT 'me', WHERE I HAVE BEEN WRONG, and WHAT was APPARENTLY INCORRECT, which NEEDED CORRECTION, and which I AM apparently not bright enough to be corrigible?

What WILL BE SHOWN, and SEEN, here, is that 'this one' is NOT ABLE TO back up and support its OWN CLAIM, and BELIEF, AT ALL.

So, what 'we' have, here, is ANOTHER one who just KEEPS ON PROVING 'me' ABSOLUTELY True, Right, Accurate, AND Correct.

And, the very reason WHY 'these people' KEEP PROVING 'me' Correct, here, IS, EXACTLY, what I have been SAYING ABOUT HOW the Mind, and the brain, ACTUALLY WORK.

Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 5:06 am

Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 2:22 pm

Gary Childress wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2025 11:31 pm Are we sure Trump isn't working for our enemies?

It's the people who keep clamouring to stop the investigations that are the ones who are doing the fraud. That's obvious.

What do you mean by "stop the investigations"? Who is trying to stop investigations and what "investigations" are you referring to?

GREAT CLARIFYING QUESTIONS "garry childress". Now, let 'us' SEE what, if ANY thing, FOLLOWS.

Age wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 4:53 am

attofishpi wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 1:58 am My God u r a wanka.

If this is what you want to BELIEVE IS TRUE, then this is PERFECTLY FINE and OKAY, WITH me.

But, 'who' are you even referring to, EXACTLY?

And, MORE IMPORTANTLY, what are your, EXACT, REASONS for you BELIEVING that 'that' IS TRUE?

My God, you are just making my statement more obvious.