Another example of your inability to read things other people write. Only a smattering of your arguments get so far as to be circular. By far your most common failings are simply unsound arguments wherein the premises and the conclusions are entirely untethered.Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2024 3:44 am Give me an example where I had failed in logic?
In most cases where I am accused [by PH and FDP] of failed logic is 'circularity' but this is actually due to their failed logic in the broader sense.
You never understood the basic concept of having premises which, if true, guarantee truth of the conclusion. Pete and I have both shown many times how the premises in one of your arguments could be true but the conclusion false. You just don't understand that's a problem because you have no grasp of elementary logic.