What do you think ? 💭

[Fairy]

There are at least two: One is you who is aware of what you cause and another one is the one you become aware of what she/he/it causes.

I do not know what you are seeing there, but if saying ‘two at least’ is what works for you, then good for you. It’s your experience, I have no argument with your statement.

But I only see one, not two. There’s only one of us here, in my opinion, that’s how this one here sees it.

In fact the whole of everything that is without beginning or end, must be a solipsistic infinity where division is impossible in all actuality.
However, within imagination, division is very much a thing, and apparent, albeit illusory.

[Fairy]

Q: What do you think?
A: Thoughts



ahaha

The I or seperate self is only present when thoughts about it appear. ahaha

[Walker]

Q: What do you think?
A: Thoughts



ahaha

The I or seperate self is only present when thoughts about it appear. ahaha

The question is about you, not I.

[bahman]

There are at least two: One is you who is aware of what you cause and another one is the one you become aware of what she/he/it causes.

I do not know what you are seeing there, but if saying ‘two at least’ is what works for you, then good for you. It’s your experience, I have no argument with your statement.

But I only see one, not two. There’s only one of us here, in my opinion, that’s how this one here sees it.

In fact the whole of everything that is without beginning or end, must be a solipsistic infinity where division is impossible in all actuality.
However, within imagination, division is very much a thing, and apparent, albeit illusory.

I am sure these words written are not written by me!

[Fairy]

Q: What do you think?
A: Thoughts



ahaha

The I or seperate self is only present when thoughts about it appear. ahaha

The question is about you, not I.

Same difference ahaha

[Fairy]

There are at least two: One is you who is aware of what you cause and another one is the one you become aware of what she/he/it causes.

I do not know what you are seeing there, but if saying ‘two at least’ is what works for you, then good for you. It’s your experience, I have no argument with your statement.

But I only see one, not two. There’s only one of us here, in my opinion, that’s how this one here sees it.

In fact the whole of everything that is without beginning or end, must be a solipsistic infinity where division is impossible in all actuality.
However, within imagination, division is very much a thing, and apparent, albeit illusory.

I am sure these words written are not written by me!

If you say so.

[bahman]

I do not know what you are seeing there, but if saying ‘two at least’ is what works for you, then good for you. It’s your experience, I have no argument with your statement.

But I only see one, not two. There’s only one of us here, in my opinion, that’s how this one here sees it.

In fact the whole of everything that is without beginning or end, must be a solipsistic infinity where division is impossible in all actuality.
However, within imagination, division is very much a thing, and apparent, albeit illusory.

I am sure these words written are not written by me!

If you say so.

Do you think that these words written are written by you?

[Fairy]

I am sure these words written are not written by me!

If you say so.

Do you think that these words written are written by you?

Words can’t only hands write

[bahman]

If you say so.

Do you think that these words written are written by you?

Words can’t only hands write

Do you think that these written words are written by you?

[Fairy]

Do you think that these words written are written by you?

Words can’t only hands write

Do you think that these written words are written by you?

I’ve answered. Words are written by hands, when hands are available. I’m sure there are other parts of the body that could hold a pen, but hands will suffice for now.

[bahman]

Words can’t only hands write

Do you think that these written words are written by you?

I’ve answered. Words are written by hands, when hands are available. I’m sure there are other parts of the body that could hold a pen, but hands will suffice for now.

I am asking whether these written words are written by you or not.

[Fairy]

Do you think that these written words are written by you?

I’ve answered. Words are written by hands, when hands are available. I’m sure there are other parts of the body that could hold a pen, but hands will suffice for now.

I am asking whether these written words are written by you or not.

I’ve answered.

[bahman]

I’ve answered. Words are written by hands, when hands are available. I’m sure there are other parts of the body that could hold a pen, but hands will suffice for now.

I am asking whether these written words are written by you or not.

I’ve answered.

So you believe that I am a human being, not you, and I have the capacity to type?

[Fairy]

I am asking whether these written words are written by you or not.

I’ve answered.

So you believe that I am a human being, not you, and I have the capacity to type?

I know the concept that is “ human being” as an imagined thing in consciousness. And imagined things have no autonomy so they cannot type words. No more than a character in a nightly dream can type words, except in a dream of course.

[Age]

But I know who you are, already. I've met you many times, and not just here at PN. Don't you remember?

Once again, 'this one' has completely and utterly, absolutely, 'missed' and misunderstood what 'I' have said, and asked here.

And, once again, this is because 'this one' never considered to just seek out and obtain any 'clarification' at all, and instead just preferred to assume some 'thing', from which it then 'jumped to' the conclusion that it is true.

Again, what you said to me regarding my working out who you are, as if it is something that might happen in the future, is off.

Both of the assumptions that you have made here are absolutely False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect.

So, the rest of what you said and wrote here is absolutely moot.

I already know (have worked out/recognize) who you are. Don't you remember all these times we have met? I do hope you're not unaware we've met many times before and long before Philosophy Now was a spark of an idea in Rick Lewis' head.