Philosophy Now Forum

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 2:11 pm

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 2:09 pm

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 1:58 pm You wouldn't understand the satirical and self-deprecating style of humour the English have. You aren't one of us.

Look, I'm gonna do you a favour and cut off all the other pertinent stuff that doesn't assist your latest post.

Likewise

But you're not wise_like

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 2:11 pm

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 2:11 pm

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 2:09 pm

Look, I'm gonna do you a favour and cut off all the other pertinent stuff that doesn't assist your latest post.

Likewise

But you're not wise_like

You're drunk again.

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 2:14 pm

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 2:11 pm

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 2:11 pm
Likewise

But you're not wise_like

You're drunk again.

It doesn't take a wise man to be drunk to know when a man is not wise like.

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 2:21 pm

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 2:14 pm

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 2:11 pm

But you're not wise_like

You're drunk again.

It doesn't take a wise man to be drunk to know when a man is not wise like.

When you are drunk you seem to write unwise things that you will regret when you sober up. Such as this Londonastan thing you are doing right now, which runs contrary to the several days you spent making it obvious how difficult you find it to write without race baiting and the whole point of this thread which is seemingly supposed to express contrition in so far as you are capable of expressing something like that.

So perhaps it would be wise on your part to go to bed and sleep it off. You weren't doing very well with your other stuff anyway.

What makes U assume I am drunk.

I've noticed, that when you're being irrational and plain daft - you resort to insisting I am either drunk or having a psychotic episode.

Perhaps just analyse the fact that you are intellectually feeble instead of looking for excuses in those that point out the fact that U R indeed, intellectually feeble?

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 3:15 pm What makes U assume I am drunk.

It's when you are drunk that you write stuff lke this..

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 1:21 pm you clearly are one of their finest breeds ---> a total KUNT.

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 1:50 pm I am only being a c'nt because you treat me like 1)

And your idea of sober reflection is stuff like this...

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 9:47 pm grovelling..no, Rick simply banned me for a week - due to my dropping the C bomb on Will (he annoyed me re a graph while I drank too many expresso martinis n beers)

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 3:35 pm

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 3:15 pm What makes U assume I am drunk.

It's when you are drunk that you write stuff lke this..

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 1:21 pm you clearly are one of their finest breeds ---> a total KUNT.

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 1:50 pm I am only being a c'nt because you treat me like 1)

And your idea of sober reflection is stuff like this...

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 9:47 pm grovelling..no, Rick simply banned me for a week - due to my dropping the C bomb on Will (he annoyed me re a graph while I drank too many expresso martinis n beers)

HEY EVERYONE - CHECK OUT WHAT EDITING AND PLACING THINGS ENTIRELY OUT OF CONTEXT ACHEIVES ----- FLASH-GOEBBELS FOR THE WIN OF DECEIT.....be careful of what you say - Flash will report everything to the top of the pyramid --- soon that will be Keir STALIN

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 3:45 pm

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 3:35 pm

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 3:15 pm What makes U assume I am drunk.

It's when you are drunk that you write stuff lke this..

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 1:21 pm you clearly are one of their finest breeds ---> a total KUNT.

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 1:50 pm I am only being a c'nt because you treat me like 1)

And your idea of sober reflection is stuff like this...

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 9:47 pm grovelling..no, Rick simply banned me for a week - due to my dropping the C bomb on Will (he annoyed me re a graph while I drank too many expresso martinis n beers)

HEY EVERYONE - CHECK OUT WHAT EDITING AND PLACING THINGS ENTIRELY OUT OF CONTEXT ACHEIVES ----- FLASH-GOEBBELS FOR THE WIN OF DECEIT.....be careful of what you say - Flash will report everything to the top of the pyramid --- soon that will be Keir STALIN

I've never bothered reporting you for naughty words. I haven't misrepresented you here either.

LMAO - you are as deluded as when u think men can be women simply by their own declaration.

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 3:55 pm LMAO - you are as deluded as when u think men can be women simply by their own declaration.

You keep caling yourself English so you can't possibly care about things like that.

..I'm starting to get the feeling that you are wanting a drivel conversation so that eventually the page flips to the next, and people dont get to see your ineptitude.

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 4:01 pm ..I'm starting to get the feeling that you are wanting a drivel conversation so that eventually the page flips to the next, and people dont get to see your ineptitude.

I think you might be telling on yourself there. You'll write equally poor stuff on the next page though so I see little reason to care.

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 4:06 pm

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 4:01 pm ..I'm starting to get the feeling that you are wanting a drivel conversation so that eventually the page flips to the next, and people dont get to see your ineptitude.

I think you might be telling on yourself there. You'll write equally poor stuff on the next page though so I see little reason to care.

The BIT that saddens me, is that I consider you intelligent enough to engage upon deeper topics and someone I'd like to delve the depths worthy of fathoming out.

..but U still must balance out..to be a shipmate. That is to say, there is no point in attempting to demean each other...if we can delve into fathoming the fathoms.

Do you agree - that we at least stop wasting effort in derailing each other?

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 5:44 pm

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 4:06 pm

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 4:01 pm ..I'm starting to get the feeling that you are wanting a drivel conversation so that eventually the page flips to the next, and people dont get to see your ineptitude.

I think you might be telling on yourself there. You'll write equally poor stuff on the next page though so I see little reason to care.

The BIT that saddens me, is that I consider you intelligent enough to engage upon deeper topics

I have already demonstrated many times that I have an adequate grasp of philosophical methods to engage usefully in many philosophical topics, there is really no need for you to affirm the obvious.

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 5:44 pm and someone I'd like to delve the depths worthy of fathoming out.

The problem here is that the same cannot be said for you. But perhaps I am wrong, maybe I have overlooked your capabilities... So ok, let's see what you can do...

Here's Chapter 1, Ch 2 and Ch 3 of my magnum opus masterwork on the foundations of morality leading to the thrilling conclusion (somewhere around Ch 11) that promises for once and for all to settle matters between some form of moral quasi-realism, or perhaps hermeneutic moral fictionalism, or who knows, perhaps we will end up with some brand new theory?

I ask this of you, do you have any interesting thoughts to offer? Counterarguments are cool, suggestions for where to go with Ch4 are good also. Your own Ch 1 as you begin to flesh out some magnum dong of your own would be even better. Sensible requests for an explanation of some point that was glossed over are excellent. What would be absolutely worthless garbage would be your usual drunken spiel about atheists, that would be boring and make you look stupid again.

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 5:44 pm ..but U still must balance out..to be a shipmate. That is to say, there is no point in attempting to demean each other...if we can delve into fathoming the fathoms.

Do you agree - that we at least stop wasting effort in derailing each other?

Unless you have quite magnificently risen to the challenge I laid out above, the best thing that is on offer is that just as soon as you abandon your silly race-baiting attempts to interfere in UK politics, I will go back to just having no interest in you at all. As I told you a couple of months ago, you used to be a harmless madman who I felt no desire to pick on before you started spamming all the nazi stuff.

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 6:57 pm

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 5:44 pm

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 4:06 pm
I think you might be telling on yourself there. You'll write equally poor stuff on the next page though so I see little reason to care.

The BIT that saddens me, is that I consider you intelligent enough to engage upon deeper topics

I have already demonstrated many times that I have an adequate grasp of philosophical methods to engage usefully in many philosophical topics, there is really no need for you to affirm the obvious.

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 5:44 pm and someone I'd like to delve the depths worthy of fathoming out.

The problem here is that the same cannot be said for you. But perhaps I am wrong, maybe I have overlooked your capabilities... So ok, let's see what you can do...

Here's Chapter 1, Ch 2 and Ch 3 of my magnum opus masterwork on the foundations of morality leading to the thrilling conclusion (somewhere around Ch 11) that promises for once and for all to settle matters between some form of moral quasi-realism, or perhaps hermeneutic moral fictionalism, or who knows, perhaps we will end up with some brand new theory?

I ask this of you, do you have any interesting thoughts to offer? Counterarguments are cool, suggestions for where to go with Ch4 are good also. Your own Ch 1 as you begin to flesh out some magnum dong of your own would be even better. Sensible requests for an explanation of some point that was glossed over are excellent. What would be absolutely worthless garbage would be your usual drunken spiel about atheists, that would be boring and make you look stupid again.

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2024 5:44 pm ..but U still must balance out..to be a shipmate. That is to say, there is no point in attempting to demean each other...if we can delve into fathoming the fathoms.

Do you agree - that we at least stop wasting effort in derailing each other?

Unless you have quite magnificently risen to the challenge I laid out above, the best thing that is on offer is that just as soon as you abandon your silly race-baiting attempts to interfere in UK politics, I will go back to just having no interest in you at all. As I told you a couple of months ago, you used to be a harmless madman who I felt no desire to pick on before you started spamming all the nazi stuff.

I read the entirety of your post, and as I read I thought (since its rather late here) I'll read that Ch 1/2/3 but you just fucked it right up didn't ya?

The red bit. I've never "spammed" anything relating to NAZI stuff - in fact, my forbears that I am proud of - FOUGHT THE NAZIS and FASCISTS you fucking IDIOT.

Seriously - you just fucked up (because of your biased bigoted idiotic FAR left idiocy - ya fly the Palestinian flag and yer cool, accepted. Fly the Union\St George flag and AUTOMATICALLY you are FASCIST\NAZI
<---- IRONY BEING IT'S THOSE THAT FLEW THE UNION\ST GEORGE FLAGS THAT FOUGHT FACISM\NAZISM '

further IRONY...LGBT+ aligning with MUSLIMS <----need I point out the IRONY?