Philosophy Now Forum

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 9:01 am So if a man talks with a higher pitch, then he is effectively a woman.
And if a woman talks with a lower pitch, then she is effectively a man.

You are more stupid than I realised.

Harbal wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 9:06 amYou are more stupid than I realised.

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 8:47 am

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 8:35 amFor the same reason we have 'women'

Why have women?

To enjoy the absurdism of conceptualising 'the non-conceptual'

Look, if nobody on this forum can give a straight answer about difference between men and women, then this forum is way more 'woke' than originally suspected...

We may have a full loss here.

I have given you a straight answer.

If you are not satisfied with that answer, then you can always substitute the answer with your own answer. I'm fairly sure your own answer would be more satisfying for you. If you are looking for the answer in someone else, that will in your opinion, guarantee a satisfactory answer of your personal approval, then you'll just be playing the mind game that is 'approval'. You'll be giving the green light for your defining models to exist in your personal mental sphere of knowledge, a little keeper that you can store away in your treasured little archive.. You'll co-invent a concept of something you are seeking to understand in both yourself and others, so to speak.

Let's see if we can work out what's going on with this dim wit, Wizard.

It seems to me that he wants to have a rant about biological males participating in women's sport. He obviously thinks it's wrong, but he also wants to think that a certain group of people here, who he has arbitrarily labelled as "woke" support the principle, so that he can shout "WOKIE" at them. He hasn't bothered to find out what anybody actually does think, because it might turn out that they don't support the idea of men participating in women's sport, which would leave him with no one to shout "WOKIE" at.

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 9:40 amI have given you a straight answer.

If you are not satisfied with that answer, then you can always substitute the answer with your own answer. I'm fairly sure your own answer would be more satisfying for you. If you are looking for the answer in someone else, that will in your opinion, guarantee a satisfactory answer of your personal approval, then you'll just be playing the mind game that is 'approval'. You'll be giving the green light for your defining models to exist in your personal mental sphere of knowledge, a little keeper that you can store away in your treasured little archive.. You'll co-invent a concept of something you are seeking to understand in both yourself and others, so to speak.

Harbal wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 9:44 amLet's see if we can work out what's going on with this dim wit, Wizard.

It seems to me that he wants to have a rant about biological males participating in women's sport. He obviously thinks it's wrong, but he also wants to think that a certain group of people here, who he has arbitrarily labelled as "woke" support the principle, so that he can shout "WOKIE" at them. He hasn't bothered to find out what anybody actually does think, because it might turn out that they don't support the idea of men participating in women's sport, which would leave him with no one to shout "WOKIE" at.

This is literally projection, because, I asked and both of you balked.

This is called intellectual dishonesty. Something Hairball's never concerned himself with in his entire life, apparently.

To answer the question, there are a very large number of differences between men and women, ranging from very minor ones to extremely important ones.

It is therefore unfair to have men competing in women's sports, and nor should men be allowed into women's private spaces, such as bathrooms, changing rooms, and so on. This exact issue has cropped up at my place of work, and I, along with most other members of staff, have been strongly opposed to the idea.

Maia wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 9:59 amTo answer the question, there are a very large number of differences between men and women, ranging from very minor ones to extremely important ones.

It is therefore unfair to have men competing in women's sports, and nor should men be allowed into women's private spaces, such as bathrooms, changing rooms, and so on. This exact issue has cropped up at my place of work, and I, along with most other members of staff, have been strongly opposed to the idea.

I appreciate you mopping the floor with these clowns, Maia.

What would you say is the largest, most important difference?

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 9:49 am

Harbal wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 9:44 amLet's see if we can work out what's going on with this dim wit, Wizard.

It seems to me that he wants to have a rant about biological males participating in women's sport. He obviously thinks it's wrong, but he also wants to think that a certain group of people here, who he has arbitrarily labelled as "woke" support the principle, so that he can shout "WOKIE" at them. He hasn't bothered to find out what anybody actually does think, because it might turn out that they don't support the idea of men participating in women's sport, which would leave him with no one to shout "WOKIE" at.

This is literally projection, because, I asked and both of you balked.

This is called intellectual dishonesty. Something Hairball's never concerned himself with in his entire life, apparently.

You asked about the difference between men and women. Well there are lots of differences between them, so unless you narrow it down, I have no idea what you expect me to say. You didn't ask me my opinion of men participating in women's sport. If you had asked, I would have told you that I don't think it should be allowed.

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 10:02 am

Maia wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 9:59 amTo answer the question, there are a very large number of differences between men and women, ranging from very minor ones to extremely important ones.

It is therefore unfair to have men competing in women's sports, and nor should men be allowed into women's private spaces, such as bathrooms, changing rooms, and so on. This exact issue has cropped up at my place of work, and I, along with most other members of staff, have been strongly opposed to the idea.

I appreciate you mopping the floor with these clowns, Maia.

What would you say is the largest, most important difference?

If I had to pick one, probably their different roles in reproduction.

Maia wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 9:59 am To answer the question, there are a very large number of differences between men and women, ranging from very minor ones to extremely important ones.

It is therefore unfair to have men competing in women's sports, and nor should men be allowed into women's private spaces, such as bathrooms, changing rooms, and so on. This exact issue has cropped up at my place of work, and I, along with most other members of staff, have been strongly opposed to the idea.

For the record, I completely agree with this.

Maia wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 10:03 am

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 10:02 am

Maia wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 9:59 amTo answer the question, there are a very large number of differences between men and women, ranging from very minor ones to extremely important ones.

It is therefore unfair to have men competing in women's sports, and nor should men be allowed into women's private spaces, such as bathrooms, changing rooms, and so on. This exact issue has cropped up at my place of work, and I, along with most other members of staff, have been strongly opposed to the idea.

I appreciate you mopping the floor with these clowns, Maia.

What would you say is the largest, most important difference?

If I had to pick one, probably their different roles in reproduction.

And what would you say is the largest, most important difference between Wizard and someone with a normally functioning brain? And do you, for instance, think he should be allowed out in public unaccompanied?

Harbal wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 10:10 am

Maia wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 10:03 am

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 10:02 am
I appreciate you mopping the floor with these clowns, Maia.

What would you say is the largest, most important difference?

If I had to pick one, probably their different roles in reproduction.

And what would you say is the largest, most important difference between Wizard and someone with a normally functioning brain? And do you, for instance, think he should be allowed out in public unaccompanied?

I didn't realise he was allowed out!

Maia wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 10:13 am

Harbal wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 10:10 am

Maia wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 10:03 am

If I had to pick one, probably their different roles in reproduction.

And what would you say is the largest, most important difference between Wizard and someone with a normally functioning brain? And do you, for instance, think he should be allowed out in public unaccompanied?

I didn't realise he was allowed out!

Well I can see why you would assume that he wasn't.

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 9:49 am This is literally projection, because, I asked and both of you balked.

This is called intellectual dishonesty.

Balk: to hesitate or be unwilling to accept an idea or undertaking.

Exactly what ''idea'' are you propositioning here, that to you, is seen as intellectual dishonesty?

Harbal wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 10:19 am

Maia wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 10:13 am

Harbal wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 10:10 am

And what would you say is the largest, most important difference between Wizard and someone with a normally functioning brain? And do you, for instance, think he should be allowed out in public unaccompanied?

I didn't realise he was allowed out!

Well I can see why you would assume that he wasn't.

I think he may have been assuming that everyone here would support what I believe is called gender ideology, simply because they oppose his views on most other matters.