Re: Impossibility of time travel
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 11:35 am
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Since this is an advice column for you, learn to not assert assumptions based on your ignorance concerning another's knowlege, Einstein.attofishpi wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 11:35 amLearn and understand some science b4 you assert nothing is impossible.![]()
Wot?
Wot? What has that got to do with you asserting that EVERYTHING\ANYTHING is possible? Please, do provide YOUR knowledge that EVERYTHING\ANYTHING is possible - that is not implied by your Einstein quote. Idiot.
Oh, have a little giggle for yourself - fantastic concept of an emoti to have on a "philosophy" forum.
Are you drunk or merely dim?
Possibly. But even in stasis, you will still be travelling forwards in time. This is a much talked about phenomenon in Sci-fi - but like FTL travel it is highly likely that it will never be achieved. Human biochemistry is massively complex. What might be more likley to succeed is storing the inforamation genetic and cerebral of the moment. A sort of brain download, and then in the far future rebuild the body using the DNA as a blueprint and then upload the "mind" into the new body.attofishpi wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 8:14 amOne can also leap time - s_leep. - when we sleep sometimes when we wake fills like a minute or two (hours later).Sculptor wrote: ↑Mon Feb 07, 2022 10:27 pmYes, you cannot go back.Jori wrote: ↑Sun Feb 06, 2022 3:32 am Time travel is science fiction. You cannot travel to the past because the past no longer exists. It's gone. Also you cannot travel to the future because it doesn't exist yet. One cannot go somewhere that does not exist.
The grandfather paradox can be solved by the creation of an alternative reality when the grandfather is killed. However another solution is simply that one cannot go back to the past to kill the grandfather in the first place.
But we are all travellers in time. We are all going forwards in time, and if you really want you can go much faster in time if you simply go very very fast.
The closer you get to the speed of light the faster your subjective time. This means if you travel near the speed of light then return to earth you will be in the future.
"Stasis" - is a plausible concept I think one day - to keep the body from ageing in a sleep like state to travel vast distances in space and time.
Yes, accoding to Einstein, (and I do not think this part of his theory of Relativity has been challenged) when you reach the speed of light you mass becomes infinite, and so would require an infinite power to ge to that speed.
If one could travel faster than the speed of light, with the right equipment such as a huge radio receiver dish - one could plausibly (under those conditions) receive TV transmissions of Earth from eras such as the 60s etc. Yes, I believe that is nonsense in reality.
But ya, no past time travel, unless the Panetheistic God unraveled causality to a point in time. Or simulated what had been recorded (not time travel).
The laugh is, you with limited knowledge, and supreme assumptions, have no knowledge of the conditions required for the, not even.
Why don't you just fuck off and take a walk in the surface of the sun, since nothing is impossible. Let's see you do it!!
That's right, I forgot. You're a coward who insults as a last resort.Sculptor wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 12:44 pmWhy don't you just fuck off and take a walk in the surface of the sun, since nothing is impossible. Let's see you do it!!
Until then jog on!
Don’t forget, this is a philosophy forum, and just to illustrate a magnitude of Dickness, I won’t call you Einstein again because after all, credulity only stretches so far.attofishpi wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 11:51 am I could drink > 2 bottles of whiskey and out logic U. You talk shite. Where is YOUR knowledge that ANYTHING\EVERYTHING is possible?
This simple sentence tidily disposes of any bleating (past present or future,) that demands proof other than rationality and logic, that passes for discussion.Walker wrote:Nothing is impossible, although ignorance of conditions and elements that comprise a condition, abounds.
Stick to the thread, dickhead. I am a poet, and ya, I know it.Walker wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 1:02 pmDon’t forget, this is a philosophy forum, and just to illustrate a magnitude of Dickness, I won’t call you Einstein again because after all, credulity only stretches so far.attofishpi wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 11:51 am I could drink > 2 bottles of whiskey and out logic U. You talk shite. Where is YOUR knowledge that ANYTHING\EVERYTHING is possible?
Nobody outlasts everyone let alone the last one, son. Drunks have been known to call any particular insight a moment of clarity, which is a moment notable for it’s transience and worth as compared to a cup or two of hot chocolate after shoveling snow.
It's probably too late for you.
Consider the fragmenting of human identity, especially these days with attention being pulled here and there by the lies being told. Oh, the lies those politicians and gubberment folks tell.