For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Atla wrote: ↑Fri Feb 18, 2022 8:17 pmI once tried to do that with a 230 terawatt laser and it didn't work, you'll have to use a stronger one?trokanmariel wrote: ↑Mon Oct 25, 2021 4:54 pm Can the words "poor" and "homeless" be eradicated from the dictionary, and from all public speech?
You are asking if Bernie should mention out thread?trokanmariel wrote: ↑Fri Feb 18, 2022 7:45 pmI'll rephrase:Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri Feb 18, 2022 4:59 pmIs English a second langauge?trokanmariel wrote: ↑Fri Feb 18, 2022 4:45 pm
The 17%, that is referenced: should Bernie Sanders publicly say that they contain within them our discussion.
should Bernie Sanders say, in public, that the 17% of children living in poverty in the United States contain within them the contents of our discussion, on this thread?
You hit it with a laser, what about it?trokanmariel wrote: ↑Fri Feb 18, 2022 10:41 pmAtla wrote: ↑Fri Feb 18, 2022 8:17 pmI once tried to do that with a 230 terawatt laser and it didn't work, you'll have to use a stronger one?trokanmariel wrote: ↑Mon Oct 25, 2021 4:54 pm Can the words "poor" and "homeless" be eradicated from the dictionary, and from all public speech?
What about the public speech part?
Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri Feb 18, 2022 10:56 pmYou are asking if Bernie should mention out thread?trokanmariel wrote: ↑Fri Feb 18, 2022 7:45 pmI'll rephrase:
should Bernie Sanders say, in public, that the 17% of children living in poverty in the United States contain within them the contents of our discussion, on this thread?
Are you serious?
I think it will be a cold day in hell before Bernie has the time to notice this petty little Forum.trokanmariel wrote: ↑Sat Feb 19, 2022 5:11 pmSculptor wrote: ↑Fri Feb 18, 2022 10:56 pmYou are asking if Bernie should mention out thread?trokanmariel wrote: ↑Fri Feb 18, 2022 7:45 pm
I'll rephrase:
should Bernie Sanders say, in public, that the 17% of children living in poverty in the United States contain within them the contents of our discussion, on this thread?
Are you serious?
The thread is politics, and Bernie represents politics; it can be seen as politics for politics, so yes, Bernie should mention our thread.
In addition, there is the component of giving words to people over giving statistics to people. The topic in question is about taking away words, thus, it can be about giving words.
I'll clarify:
The thread should be mentioned, because it represents the dichotomy, of giving statistics (the inhumane) versus taking away words (the humane), an ironic dichotomy that "could perhaps" deserve a public mention, on the basis of the proof of the opposite.
The opposite = taking away statistics versus giving words
Confirmation of two, as a versus proof: confirmation of two, i.e. politicians and members of public espousing statistics, and then versus proof, which is the giving statistics confrontation, supported by the confirmation of two, thus, Bernie should mention the thread
Sculptor wrote: ↑Sun Feb 20, 2022 12:09 amI think it will be a cold day in hell before Bernie has the time to notice this petty little Forum.trokanmariel wrote: ↑Sat Feb 19, 2022 5:11 pm
The thread is politics, and Bernie represents politics; it can be seen as politics for politics, so yes, Bernie should mention our thread.
In addition, there is the component of giving words to people over giving statistics to people. The topic in question is about taking away words, thus, it can be about giving words.
I'll clarify:
The thread should be mentioned, because it represents the dichotomy, of giving statistics (the inhumane) versus taking away words (the humane), an ironic dichotomy that "could perhaps" deserve a public mention, on the basis of the proof of the opposite.
The opposite = taking away statistics versus giving words
Confirmation of two, as a versus proof: confirmation of two, i.e. politicians and members of public espousing statistics, and then versus proof, which is the giving statistics confrontation, supported by the confirmation of two, thus, Bernie should mention the thread
But maybe on a different planet or a different reality?
Why don't you drop him a line?trokanmariel wrote: ↑Sun Feb 20, 2022 1:24 amSculptor wrote: ↑Sun Feb 20, 2022 12:09 amI think it will be a cold day in hell before Bernie has the time to notice this petty little Forum.trokanmariel wrote: ↑Sat Feb 19, 2022 5:11 pm
The thread is politics, and Bernie represents politics; it can be seen as politics for politics, so yes, Bernie should mention our thread.
In addition, there is the component of giving words to people over giving statistics to people. The topic in question is about taking away words, thus, it can be about giving words.
I'll clarify:
The thread should be mentioned, because it represents the dichotomy, of giving statistics (the inhumane) versus taking away words (the humane), an ironic dichotomy that "could perhaps" deserve a public mention, on the basis of the proof of the opposite.
The opposite = taking away statistics versus giving words
Confirmation of two, as a versus proof: confirmation of two, i.e. politicians and members of public espousing statistics, and then versus proof, which is the giving statistics confrontation, supported by the confirmation of two, thus, Bernie should mention the thread
But maybe on a different planet or a different reality?
From the perspective, that Sanders has perhaps up to about 2,000 days to live (including over that amount), he likely would be able to visit the forum, read the thread, and then air it.
Sculptor wrote: ↑Sun Feb 20, 2022 10:57 amWhy don't you drop him a line?trokanmariel wrote: ↑Sun Feb 20, 2022 1:24 am
From the perspective, that Sanders has perhaps up to about 2,000 days to live (including over that amount), he likely would be able to visit the forum, read the thread, and then air it.