For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
The inmate speaks. Time for your meds now.Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 25, 2021 12:43 amAnd I have read quite a lot of you, here in this forum, say the same thing.
It is like you all BELIEVE it is the "others" who are insane.
Which, by the way, is quite humorous to observe and watch unfold.
To show how 'that', and what you were talking about, were NOT an issue here.
WHY do so many people in philosophy forums spend so much time looking at, judging, and talking about, "others", like above, instead of just questioning, clarifying, and/or backing up and supporting their claims?RCSaunders wrote: ↑Sat Sep 25, 2021 2:22 amThe inmate speaks. Time for you meds now.
Antimatter is composed of antiparticles and I believe that they repel each other (they do not clump together like matter)… Antimatter (antiparticles) is then perhaps dissolved in a certain "natural" concentration in physical space…Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 25, 2021 12:21 amDefine what 'antimatter' refers to exactly, then, 'how things are around antimatter' is self-explanatory.Cerveny wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:02 pmAs far as the universal attraction of matter is concerned, it is perhaps the least interesting problem in physics for me. Matter deforms (relaxes?) the structure of physical space (aether) around it, which causes their mutual attraction - such as bubbles or fragments on the surface of water or as conductors carrying current in parallel (towards the future:) The question is how things are around antimatter…Sculptor wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 9:44 am
When it comes to the fundemental structure of the universe there are no answers to those questions simply bacause there are no reasons.
Why is every body in the universe attracted to every other body in the universe, which leads to the phenomenon of gravity??
WHilst science is the only discipline of knowledge capable of attempting that questions, and it has been asked by science despite your comments that it only addresses "comfortable" questions, scientists are smart enough to know that there are no reasons for that.
Why don't you be brave and try to answer some of those questions here on the Forum? Or are you content in your own comfort to avoid them?
What you will need to understand about science is that it's job is to intricately DESCRIBE the universe. It really has not interest in questions as to WHY.
If you want to know why, ask a priest. You can have a rainbow of all sorts of contradictory answers from different priests, immans and gurus that will be gushing with responses
Can you see, feel, smell, taste, or hear 'antiparticles' or 'antimatter'?Cerveny wrote: ↑Sat Sep 25, 2021 7:31 amAntimatter is composed of antiparticles and I believe that they repel each other (they do not clump together like matter)… Antimatter (antiparticles) is then perhaps dissolved in a certain "natural" concentration in physical space…Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 25, 2021 12:21 amDefine what 'antimatter' refers to exactly, then, 'how things are around antimatter' is self-explanatory.Cerveny wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:02 pm
As far as the universal attraction of matter is concerned, it is perhaps the least interesting problem in physics for me. Matter deforms (relaxes?) the structure of physical space (aether) around it, which causes their mutual attraction - such as bubbles or fragments on the surface of water or as conductors carrying current in parallel (towards the future:) The question is how things are around antimatter…
Physical space = aether and antiparticles are structural defects in its regular structure, complementary to structural defects manifesting as elementary particles ... (the simplest examples such couple are eg interstitial and a vacantion), but I have written it many times, if you are interested, you can find it …Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 25, 2021 10:24 amCan you see, feel, smell, taste, or hear 'antiparticles' or 'antimatter'?
Also, matter is just composed of (particles of) matter. So, to say that 'matter' is composed of matter particles or 'antimatter' is composed of antiparticles is completely unnecessary, or redundant.
Furthermore, what you 'believe' is not necessarily true, right, not correct anyway. Do you have any actual proof for your belief?
Now, what exactly is 'antimatter'?
When you explain this, then we might be able to see and understand how it might be possible how this 'thing' or 'antithing' could dissolve, in anyway.
By the way what is 'physical space', to you? And is there such a 'thing' as 'nonphysical space'? If yes, then could this type of space be referred to as 'antispace', or would that not work?
Teehee.Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 25, 2021 12:41 amLOL Name one person in this forum, or on this planet, that thinks they know the answer to EVERY thing. When, and if, you do, then we can ask them if this is correct or not.Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri Sep 24, 2021 8:23 pmIndeed. Thanks for the support.RCSaunders wrote: ↑Fri Sep 24, 2021 3:33 pm
I'm sorry I missed this discussion earlier. I have to say, I am in total agreement with every one of your responses on this thread. Perhaps best summed up by, "It does not change the fact that there are no explanations, there are just more intricate descriptions. My own view is that science has no interest, as science, in why anything is what it is or does what it does (as if reality were contingent on something else (sky daddy?)--as the mystics on this thread like IC contend), science only seeks to identify what things actually are and what they actually do, NOT WHY.
Since we're both instructed the only place to find the truth is in some journal, I guess we'll both be sent to our rooms to read some.
Sometimes I think I'm in a nuthouse.
There are so many people here who think they know the answer to everything, and completely lack humility.
What you assume "others" are thinking is NOT necessarily the same as what they are actually thinking."immanuel can" OBVIOUSLY believes in things, which OBVIOUSLY could NOT even be close to being true, but "immanuel can" also does not think that they know the answer to EVERY thing.
Finding and knowing the answer to what, to you, is likely to be a meaningless question in the first place, is an extremely simple and easy process, by the way.Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri Sep 24, 2021 8:23 pm It seems obvious that in a world where everyone that thinks they know the answer to life the universe and everything, can never find clear agreement with everyone else who thinks they know the answer to life the universe and everything, it is doubtful than anyone could ever have an answer to what is likely to be a meaningless question in the first place.
But this can only be proven true when, and if, you provide what 'that' question is exactly.Do you express your beliefs here?
If yes, then could they be false beliefs and self made delusions? Or, are your beliefs irrefutably true, right, and correct?
What is 'aether', to you?Cerveny wrote: ↑Sat Sep 25, 2021 10:45 amPhysical space = aether and antiparticles are structural defects in its regular structure, complementary to structural defects manifesting as elementary particles ... (the simplest examples such couple are eg interstitial and a vacantion), but I have written it many times, if you are interested, you can find it …Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 25, 2021 10:24 amCan you see, feel, smell, taste, or hear 'antiparticles' or 'antimatter'?
Also, matter is just composed of (particles of) matter. So, to say that 'matter' is composed of matter particles or 'antimatter' is composed of antiparticles is completely unnecessary, or redundant.
Furthermore, what you 'believe' is not necessarily true, right, not correct anyway. Do you have any actual proof for your belief?
Now, what exactly is 'antimatter'?
When you explain this, then we might be able to see and understand how it might be possible how this 'thing' or 'antithing' could dissolve, in anyway.
By the way what is 'physical space', to you? And is there such a 'thing' as 'nonphysical space'? If yes, then could this type of space be referred to as 'antispace', or would that not work?
And here we have ANOTHER one who uses the ignore button, but can NOT help "themselves".Sculptor wrote: ↑Sat Sep 25, 2021 11:04 amTeehee.Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 25, 2021 12:41 amLOL Name one person in this forum, or on this planet, that thinks they know the answer to EVERY thing. When, and if, you do, then we can ask them if this is correct or not.
What you assume "others" are thinking is NOT necessarily the same as what they are actually thinking."immanuel can" OBVIOUSLY believes in things, which OBVIOUSLY could NOT even be close to being true, but "immanuel can" also does not think that they know the answer to EVERY thing.
Finding and knowing the answer to what, to you, is likely to be a meaningless question in the first place, is an extremely simple and easy process, by the way.Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri Sep 24, 2021 8:23 pm It seems obvious that in a world where everyone that thinks they know the answer to life the universe and everything, can never find clear agreement with everyone else who thinks they know the answer to life the universe and everything, it is doubtful than anyone could ever have an answer to what is likely to be a meaningless question in the first place.
But this can only be proven true when, and if, you provide what 'that' question is exactly.Do you express your beliefs here?
If yes, then could they be false beliefs and self made delusions? Or, are your beliefs irrefutably true, right, and correct?
I love to take a look at people I've already put on Ignore from time to time to remind myself why.
Here we have a list of strawmen, misdirections and misunderstandings from a person desperate to look relevant.
Oh Um.
WHY do some people in philosophy forums spend so much time looking at, judging, and talking about what, "others", do on the forum?Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 25, 2021 4:03 amWHY do so many people in philosophy forums spend so much time looking at, judging, and talking about, "others", like above, instead of just questioning, clarifying, and/or backing up and supporting their claims?
In regard to the surprising number of mentally-imbalanced people that come across this forum, is it a sign that a large percentage of humankind is mentally-imbalanced -– or does this forum attract those who either, 1) cannot get interaction or be heard elsewhere, and/or 2) seek a loosely-moderated platform they won’t get kicked off of no matter how manic and distorted their interactions may be?
And they seem to lack enough self-awareness or self-honesty to be embarrassed by (or awakened to) the obvious transparency of their self-serving, supremely-knowing identity, no matter how many people point out the absurdity of it to them. It is as if they are spinning endlessly in an imaginary protective cocoon, chanting la-la-la to drown out all but their own thoughts.Sculptor to RCSaunders wrote: ↑Fri Sep 24, 2021 8:23 pm There are so many people here who think they know the answer to everything, and completely lack humility.
Apparently the glory of a delusion-of-uniqueness blinds some from noticing/considering all the others who are also claiming unique supreme knowing too. Observing human behavior can offer a lot of insight into philosophy.Sculptor to RCSaunders wrote: ↑Fri Sep 24, 2021 8:23 pm It seems obvious that in a world where everyone that thinks they know the answer to life the universe and everything, can never find clear agreement with everyone else who thinks they know the answer to life the universe and everything...
YES!!! Personal agendas are clearly too intoxicating to be deterred by truth. And some people take up positions under banners (such as philosophy) to pretend that's what they're doing... while their actions show otherwise to nearly everyone else (as shown by a broad spectrum of feedback).Sculptor to RCSaunders wrote: ↑Fri Sep 24, 2021 8:23 pm They then go on to misuse and abuse philosophy as if it were a portal for them to express their false beliefs rather than a methodology to unpack those self same delusions.
Because they might be asking clarifying questions, which if "others" were Truly OPEN, then would just answer Honestly while taking a good hard LOOK at "them self".RCSaunders wrote: ↑Sat Sep 25, 2021 2:28 pmWHY do some people in philosophy forums spend so much time looking at, judging, and talking about what, "others", do on the forum?
While looking at and judging "others", in forums, some people seem to forget that they are doing the EXACT SAME thing/s, for the EXAXT SAME reason/s.Lacewing wrote: ↑Sat Sep 25, 2021 10:11 pmIn regard to the surprising number of mentally-imbalanced people that come across this forum, is it a sign that a large percentage of humankind is mentally-imbalanced -– or does this forum attract those who either, 1) cannot get interaction or be heard elsewhere, and/or 2) seek a loosely-moderated platform they won’t get kicked off of no matter how manic and distorted their interactions may be?
But yet NONE, like the one here who wrote the above quote, can answer, properly and correctly, the question, 'Who am 'I'?'Lacewing wrote: ↑Sat Sep 25, 2021 10:11 pmAnd they seem to lack enough self-awareness or self-honesty to be embarrassed by (or awakened to) the obvious transparency of their self-serving, supremely-knowing identity, no matter how many people point out the absurdity of it to them.Sculptor to RCSaunders wrote: ↑Fri Sep 24, 2021 8:23 pm There are so many people here who think they know the answer to everything, and completely lack humility.
Which is EXACTLY what the writer if the above quite does.
And yet the writer if the above quote here is COMPLETELY BLINDED to the FACT that but is that one who BELIEVES it has the supreme and only one true knowledge of things.Lacewing wrote: ↑Sat Sep 25, 2021 10:11 pmApparently the glory of a delusion-of-uniqueness blinds some from noticing/considering all the others who are also claiming unique supreme knowing too.Sculptor to RCSaunders wrote: ↑Fri Sep 24, 2021 8:23 pm It seems obvious that in a world where everyone that thinks they know the answer to life the universe and everything, can never find clear agreement with everyone else who thinks they know the answer to life the universe and everything...
AND, it has been YOUR BEHAVIOR, which I have been POINTING OUT, but which you have REFUSED to LOOK AT nor even to consider.
LOLLacewing wrote: ↑Sat Sep 25, 2021 10:11 pmYES!!! Personal agendas are clearly too intoxicating to be deterred by truth.Sculptor to RCSaunders wrote: ↑Fri Sep 24, 2021 8:23 pm They then go on to misuse and abuse philosophy as if it were a portal for them to express their false beliefs rather than a methodology to unpack those self same delusions.
WHY do so many people come into philosophy forums to just LOOK AT, JUDGE, and TALK ABOUT "others", especially considering that this is the EXACT OPPOSITE of what was meant to take place in philosophical discussions?
Or why can't anything run faster than light? … Do we need such science at all?