For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Then show me 'what you said' and 'how I misrepresented what was said' because I do not understand your reply. Did you not argue along the lines [imply] that my unwitnessed alternate experience could have been an hallucination?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:30 pmOf course. But you misrepresented what I had said, so I corrected that. You can't expect me not to.
Okay.
A twist.VVilliam wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 6:39 pm
Yet you make accusation that all other 'typical persons' who do not have supporting witnesses are therefore hallucinating.
Again, what I said was that 12 men do not simultaneously hallucinate the same event. I also said that a person who has an "alternate reality" that nobody else sees (when others should be able to, if it was real) is most probably hallucinating.
And anybody should agree with both claims.
You are just a time waster when it comes to being challenged re your beliefs.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 5:11 amOkay.A twist.VVilliam wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 6:39 pm
Yet you make accusation that all other 'typical persons' who do not have supporting witnesses are therefore hallucinating.
Again, what I said was that 12 men do not simultaneously hallucinate the same event. I also said that a person who has an "alternate reality" that nobody else sees (when others should be able to, if it was real) is most probably hallucinating.
And anybody should agree with both claims.
Amen to that brother.