Philosophy Now Forum

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 8:30 am Is Genesis History?

I personally believe that The Bible is historically, scientifically, and geologically correct.

The proof and evidence of creator God is already within you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UM82qxx ... R&index=16

The Bible, the greatest story ever told. His story.

C now we are back to square 1.

I believe ALMOST fuk all about the buy bull - (or maybe it is just what we get told from interpretations of it)

Eg. Geologically correct?
- WHAT is mentioned regarding the nature of geo matter that I might not be aware of?

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 11:39 amSo there is never anything wrong with how source returns to it's own source, there is no wrong path to take here, for all paths lead to the same destination, which is back to the Godhead.

The source is also known as the fountainhead. There’s a philosophy that says in all cases, Godhead in man expresses as ego fulfillment, and even altruistic acts are acts to fulfill the ego. Some take this to mean trampling on the rights of others, but that's not true, for such an action creates disharmony that jeopardizes the ego’s self-interest. Thus in view of this philosophy, back to the Godhead is back to the self-interest of ego, for within the natural boundaries of one's own existence, by truly following self-interest one can benefit all of creation.

Of course many don't see it that way.

Walker wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 12:24 pm

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 11:39 amSo there is never anything wrong with how source returns to it's own source, there is no wrong path to take here, for all paths lead to the same destination, which is back to the Godhead.

The source is also known as the fountainhead. There’s a philosophy that says in all cases, Godhead in man expresses as ego fulfillment, and even altruistic acts are acts to fulfill the ego. Some take this to mean trampling on the rights of others, but that's not true, for such an action creates disharmony that jeopardizes the ego’s self-interest. Thus in view of this philosophy, back to the Godhead is back to the self-interest of ego, for within the natural boundaries of one's own existence, by truly following self-interest one can benefit all of creation.

Of course many don't see it that way.

State the source of this story of "GODHEAD" --- b.cause? I am a tad sick of hearing it on this forum over the years.

Yes master.

You poor sick thing. You’ve heard of this but never tracked it down?
You must have only the faintest idea, yet from mists strong opinions take shape.

Keywords: Ayn Rand, Objectivism, Egoism.

Walker wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 12:54 pm Yes master.

You poor sick thing. You’ve heard of this but never tracked it down?
You must have only the faintest idea, yet from mists strong opinions take shape.

Keywords: Ayn Rand, Objectivism, Egoism.

..well then, mere skerrick of intelligence, now is your great chance to impress your master.

Do 'enlighten' me.

Walker wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 12:24 pm

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 11:39 amSo there is never anything wrong with how source returns to it's own source, there is no wrong path to take here, for all paths lead to the same destination, which is back to the Godhead.

The source is also known as the fountainhead. There’s a philosophy that says in all cases, Godhead in man expresses as ego fulfillment, and even altruistic acts are acts to fulfill the ego. Some take this to mean trampling on the rights of others, but that's not true, for such an action creates disharmony that jeopardizes the ego’s self-interest. Thus in view of this philosophy, back to the Godhead is back to the self-interest of ego, for within the natural boundaries of one's own existence, by truly following self-interest one can benefit all of creation.

Of course many don't see it that way.

The Book of Proverbs.

“Don’t seek wisdom to please others. That isn’t a right or sufficient motivation. You are the one who will most benefit from the wisdom you seek after, so let the motivation come from you and not from another.”

ii. “This is perhaps the strongest expression of individualism in the Bible. Such statements (cf. Ezekiel 18; Galatians 6:4-5) are not meant to deny that people benefit or suffer from each other’s characters (cf. Proverbs 10:1), but to emphasize that the ultimate gainer or loser is the man himself.”

If you are wise, you are wise for yourself: Solomon explained how wisdom and folly directly affect the individual. Sometimes we seek wisdom more for others than ourselves; Solomon reminded us that wisdom is for yourself; the scoffer will not gain from the wisdom of others. When he is foolish he will bear it alone.

Wisdom brings her benefits to those who receive her. Finding wisdom’s start through the fear of the Lord will always be rewarded.

_____

Woman shows man God's heaven. Through woman, man has to pass through the gates of hell to reach heaven. She is love, she will show man the way to heaven.

attofishpi wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 12:58 pm
..well then, mere skerrick of intelligence, now is your great chance to impress your master.

Do 'enlighten' me.

Certainly.

You're not my master, and I'm not your monkey.

Three key words, gratis.
A rudimentary framework for those three words, gratis.
Unnamed available resources to go further.
Feedback indicates that the boat launch for further discussion was already missed.


Does it all now make sense?
If not then gosh, that's too bad.

Walker wrote: ↑Tue Feb 02, 2021 7:24 pm

attofishpi wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 12:58 pm
..well then, mere skerrick of intelligence, now is your great chance to impress your master.

Do 'enlighten' me.

Certainly.

You're not my master, and I'm not your monkey.

Three key words, gratis.
A rudimentary framework for those three words, gratis.
Unnamed available resources to go further.
Feedback indicates that the boat launch for further discussion was already missed.


Does it all now make sense?
If not then gosh, that's too bad.

Y DONT U EXPLAIN THE TERM ""GODHEAD"" THAT U BROUGHT INTO THE DISCUSSION? (and cite you source(s))

attofishpi wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 11:15 am

Walker wrote: ↑Tue Feb 02, 2021 7:24 pm

attofishpi wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 12:58 pm
..well then, mere skerrick of intelligence, now is your great chance to impress your master.

Do 'enlighten' me.

Certainly.

You're not my master, and I'm not your monkey.

Three key words, gratis.
A rudimentary framework for those three words, gratis.
Unnamed available resources to go further.
Feedback indicates that the boat launch for further discussion was already missed.


Does it all now make sense?
If not then gosh, that's too bad.

Y DONT U EXPLAIN THE TERM ""GODHEAD"" THAT U BROUGHT INTO THE DISCUSSION? (and cite you source(s))

What language is that. Loud Dog? You’re rather slow on the uptake, wot? I ain’t givin’ you nuttin’, honey. Just don’t feel the need, for whatever reason. If you want it, you get it the old-fashioned way, without a spoon, and if that leaves you still wandering, begin your search with one of the key words, from a source you find reputable.

That clears away some of the crap.

When you have something to say other than your need, something on topic to the thread, something that reflects a modicum of intelligence and thought, well you come on back down and we'll have a good old discussion, ya hear?

Always glad to help … those who help themselves.

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 1:04 pm

Walker wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 12:24 pm

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 11:39 amSo there is never anything wrong with how source returns to it's own source, there is no wrong path to take here, for all paths lead to the same destination, which is back to the Godhead.

The source is also known as the fountainhead. There’s a philosophy that says in all cases, Godhead in man expresses as ego fulfillment, and even altruistic acts are acts to fulfill the ego. Some take this to mean trampling on the rights of others, but that's not true, for such an action creates disharmony that jeopardizes the ego’s self-interest. Thus in view of this philosophy, back to the Godhead is back to the self-interest of ego, for within the natural boundaries of one's own existence, by truly following self-interest one can benefit all of creation.

Of course many don't see it that way.

The Book of Proverbs.

“Don’t seek wisdom to please others. That isn’t a right or sufficient motivation. You are the one who will most benefit from the wisdom you seek after, so let the motivation come from you and not from another.”

ii. “This is perhaps the strongest expression of individualism in the Bible. Such statements (cf. Ezekiel 18; Galatians 6:4-5) are not meant to deny that people benefit or suffer from each other’s characters (cf. Proverbs 10:1), but to emphasize that the ultimate gainer or loser is the man himself.”

If you are wise, you are wise for yourself: Solomon explained how wisdom and folly directly affect the individual. Sometimes we seek wisdom more for others than ourselves; Solomon reminded us that wisdom is for yourself; the scoffer will not gain from the wisdom of others. When he is foolish he will bear it alone.

Wisdom brings her benefits to those who receive her. Finding wisdom’s start through the fear of the Lord will always be rewarded.

_____

Woman shows man God's heaven. Through woman, man has to pass through the gates of hell to reach heaven. She is love, she will show man the way to heaven.

I find it interesting how principles actualize from infinite potentiality, according to circumstance. That's one of the things that makes the principles in the bible interesting, and relevant to the Now.

Walker wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 11:26 am

attofishpi wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 11:15 am

Walker wrote: ↑Tue Feb 02, 2021 7:24 pm
Certainly.

You're not my master, and I'm not your monkey.

Three key words, gratis.
A rudimentary framework for those three words, gratis.
Unnamed available resources to go further.
Feedback indicates that the boat launch for further discussion was already missed.


Does it all now make sense?
If not then gosh, that's too bad.

Y DONT U EXPLAIN THE TERM ""GODHEAD"" THAT U BROUGHT INTO THE DISCUSSION? (and cite you source(s))

What language is that. Loud Dog? You’re rather slow on the uptake, wot? I ain’t givin’ you nuttin’, honey. Just don’t feel the need, for whatever reason. If you want it, you get it the old-fashioned way, without a spoon, and if that leaves you still wandering, begin your search with one of the key words, from a source you find reputable.

The 'old fashioned way' dickhead on a philosophy forum is to back up what one is insisting - in your case 'GODHEAD' - like a typical American without bollocks or intelligence, you are extremely lacking in both faculties.
A philosophy forum is not a place where people tell others to go searching the internet for ridiculous statements that idiots like you make. THEY BACK UP WHAT THEY STATE WITHIN THE TOPIC AT HAND - PUSSY..

You'll get over it.

Walker wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 8:48 pm You'll get over it.

..get over wot? People that haven't earnt their stripes to be on a forum that requires debating about what ONE states.

Certainly, I don't think I ever will, until the likes of your sort piss off.

attofishpi wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:32 am

Walker wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 8:48 pm You'll get over it.

..get over wot? People that haven't earnt their stripes to be on a forum that requires debating about what ONE states.

Certainly, I don't think I ever will, until the likes of your sort piss off.

The truth is no human being alive today has the knowledge to answer the question 'who am I' or how do I exist at all, and why.

Humans are story tellers, they use their made-up languages to build ideas about anything they can possibly imagine to exist, and then call those ideas their knowledge. They then add 'belief' to their imagined structures, and then share their beliefs with other humans. Then they get all offended when other peoples beliefs and stories don't match with their own.

The most popular believed story humans make-up, is the idea and belief there is an infinite God or Spirit who is our supreme creator.
Another popular belief is the idea of there being a heaven or hell waiting for us according to our personal dedication and belief in this Creator God. And not just belief in a God, but belief in Jesus and the Bible, or the Koran, and all things spiritual and devil and angel like.

That's all humans are doing on this forum is talking about their theories and philosophies about their own self made created ideas, beliefs about what makes us feel safe, secure, nice and comforted.

I am included in this human activity aswell. I talk about God as if God is my creator. I talk about how we can make our life a heaven or a hell. I talk about how I think there maybe a God who wants us to have eternal life in paradise, because it's a lovely idea, and so I run with the idea.

But in reality, I know it's all just ideas that I have heard other people talk about, or I have read about it somewhere in a holy text book or I have seen it in a film. It's all just second hand knowledge that I have just taken on as my own knowledge and believed and wanted it all to be true, because it sounds nice, and gives hope, purpose and security to my life.

In reality, I know people are just making it all up, and that I am also making it all up, and that I have no exact or real answers as to how I exist at all, or why, I have none whatsoever, except what I wishfully think and believe.

.

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 9:42 am

Keyword: nihilism.

(end of dissertation)