You will hear of wars and rumours of wars.

[Dontaskme]

But why did you say you can’t be respectful?

Because you implied I wasn't by saying I SHOULD.

So, why did you inform I SHOULD ?

.

[Dontaskme]

I love informing myself about fake news...I mean what else is there to read ?

..you might not get that joke...sigh!

Informing oneself about it may be funny, spreading it is not it just makes you a klutz.

But did you catch the spread ? if so, then now who's the klutz....free advice, just be more careful next time.

[commonsense]

But why did you say you can’t be respectful?

Because you implied I wasn't by saying I SHOULD.

So, why did you inform I SHOULD ?

I thought you can but didn’t. I was inquiring about the lack of ability since you said cannot. I can see the miscommunication now.

[Dontaskme]

But why did you say you can’t be respectful?

Because you implied I wasn't by saying I SHOULD.

So, why did you inform I SHOULD ?

I thought you can but didn’t. I was inquiring about the lack of ability since you said cannot. I can see the miscommunication now.

Just don't SHOULD on peoples opinions to be different from yours. Life doesn't work like that, no matter how much you try to shove a should onto it.





.

[Arising_uk]

But did you catch the spread ? if so, then now who's the klutz....free advice, just be more careful next time.

But unlike you I don't spread it.

[Dontaskme]

But did you catch the spread ? if so, then now who's the klutz....free advice, just be more careful next time.

But unlike you I don't spread it.

But did you catch it?

[Dontaskme]

But did you catch the spread ? if so, then now who's the klutz....free advice, just be more careful next time.

But unlike you I don't spread it.

But did you catch it?

Nah, you probably dropped the ball, unlike you I'm a good catcher. I can detect fake news from 3 zillion miles away...

[commonsense]

Because you implied I wasn't by saying I SHOULD.

So, why did you inform I SHOULD ?

I thought you can but didn’t. I was inquiring about the lack of ability since you said cannot. I can see the miscommunication now.

Just don't SHOULD on peoples opinions to be different from yours. Life doesn't work like that, no matter how much you try to shove a should onto it.

Again, it wasn’t anyone’s opinion I was referrencing.

[Dontaskme]

I thought you can but didn’t. I was inquiring about the lack of ability since you said cannot. I can see the miscommunication now.

Just don't SHOULD on peoples opinions to be different from yours. Life doesn't work like that, no matter how much you try to shove a should onto it.

Again, it wasn’t anyone’s opinion I was referrencing.

I know what you mean. Now we on the same page.

[Arising_uk]

But did you catch it?

Nah, you probably dropped the ball, unlike you I'm a good catcher. I can detect fake news from 3 zillion miles away...

And then proceed to spread it.

[Dontaskme]

But did you catch it?

Nah, you probably dropped the ball, unlike you I'm a good catcher. I can detect fake news from 3 zillion miles away...

And then proceed to spread it.

But did you catch it?

[Arising_uk]

Catch what? That your 'classified' Chinese document was bullshit, sure. That you now claim that you spread what you know is fake news for fun is more the issue, although personally given muct of what you've posted on this forum I find your claim hard to believe.

[Dontaskme]

Catch what? That your 'classified' Chinese document was bullshit, sure.

I've already stated that I love informing myself about fake news...I mean what else is there to read ?

I guess you understand my reply to you now ... you too caught on that the news was fake, because it was appearing within the same one reader...so congratulations.


Now here's the weird science part....

Reading any story is identifying with what is always of past tense, which does not have any substance or reality within realtime AWARENESS...aka the one reading/READER

The reader in me is the same reader in you, this one reader can only identify with what is dead, believed to be real now in realtime. . which gives continuity to the idea that the characters in the story are alive, when in reality they only exist within a dead memory.
IN REALTIME REALITY THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO ONE LIVING OR DYING.
Shocking to some, but a blessed relief to others.

That you now claim that you spread what you know is fake news for fun is more the issue, although personally given muct of what you've posted on this forum I find your claim hard to believe.

But I never mentioned the word SPREAD in any of my report. That word came from your lips not mine.

When you used the word SPREAD ... that implied to the AWARENESS here....that here was something to catch, and is why I then asked you ''...did you catch the spread?.
And then you go on to make things even more muddled and confusing by stating that it was me here that used the word SPREAD when I clearly DID NOT even mention the word at all, not once. Not in the time this conversation was written.

You really do like taking my ideas completely out of their context in which they were meant and then twisting the discussion around to fit with your own model of understanding of what you are trying to understand from my point of view. And then you do this obsessively to the point of the discussion becoming totally incoherent like it is doing now.

You are a master class act at doing this every time you talk to me. But know you are only tripping over your own feet, not mine, my mission is to straighten out the crooked, and I will continue to do so, and will enjoy watching you trip over your own feet, because it is very amusing.

Do continue.

[Gary Childress]

Classified Chinese report warns Beijing faces Tiananmen-like global backlash over coronavirus that could lead to 'armed confrontation' with the US, sources reveal.

Any excuse for a good old bang gang war eh! ....Here be dragons.

Geez. Let's hope not. BTW what sources are revealing this? What is your source?

[Gary Childress]

Hmm. Well, I found this article. It seems to be the only source that came up in the top search results on it:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... urces.html

Is that where you got this info? I hear they aren't a very reliable or reputable news source, though. More like a tabloid.