I couldn't give a flying rat's turd what 'Stanford' has to say about it. It can't even spell 'encyclopaedia'.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 8:38 pmYou don't believe in centrist positions? I do.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 8:26 pm You can't have it both ways.... If everything you don't like is 'left' then everything you do like must be 'right'.
Stanford says, "Classical liberals employ a second argument connecting liberty and private property. Rather than insisting that the freedom to obtain and employ private property is simply one aspect of people’s liberty, this second argument insists that private property effectively protects liberty, and no protection can be effective without private property."And what...is a 'classic liberal'?
Henry's pro liberty and pro private property, and perceives a key link between the latter and the former. That's a Classical Liberal basic.
If Henry's a 'classical liberal' (but, heaven forbid, never 'liberal' (because apparently the two have opposite meanings

