Page 3 of 3

Re: Issue 118 - Human Rights

Posted: Sat Oct 25, 2025 1:17 pm
by Belinda
Age wrote: Sat Oct 25, 2025 12:02 pm
Belinda wrote: Thu Oct 23, 2025 6:58 pm
Age wrote: Wed Oct 22, 2025 3:02 pm

And who are 'these ones' who make actual 'objective observations' and who thus do not make 'subjective observations', at all?


Is there any thing wrong with just giving all animals the exact same 'rights' as you human animals?

It would make living so much easier and simple if all animals were given the 'same rights', equally.
Problem is that people think they have either a God-given right or a natural right to eat other animals. In fact eating other animals is an example of might makes right.
So, do you know why you think this?

If yes, then why do you think this?

But, if no, then why have you not yet worked out why you think the way you do, here?
The source of my personal motivation is irrelevant.

Re: Issue 118 - Human Rights

Posted: Sat Oct 25, 2025 4:19 pm
by Age
Belinda wrote: Sat Oct 25, 2025 1:17 pm
Age wrote: Sat Oct 25, 2025 12:02 pm
Belinda wrote: Thu Oct 23, 2025 6:58 pm

Problem is that people think they have either a God-given right or a natural right to eat other animals. In fact eating other animals is an example of might makes right.
So, do you know why you think this?

If yes, then why do you think this?

But, if no, then why have you not yet worked out why you think the way you do, here?
The source of my personal motivation is irrelevant.
Okay. So, "belinda" thinks it has either a God-given right or a natural right to eat other animals, but also claims that the reason for this motivation is irrelevant, here, in a philosophy forum.

Thee is no wonder why they took so long to 'catch up' and understand.