For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Are you unable or simply unwilling to answer my question?Lacewing wrote:Yep, he clearly doesn't know how to do anything other than continually flapping his pie hole like a big baby wanting attention.Hobbes' Choice about Blob wrote:Yet he continues to make a complete ass of himself.
Continually flapping your pie hole about the same old stuff. Like a big dumb baby wanting ALL the attention on itself. You deserve the same responses over and over.bobevenson wrote:Are you unable or simply unwilling to answer my question?
I guess this means you agree that you are a big dumb baby flapping your pie hole with the same stupid stuff over and over.bobevenson wrote:I guess I'll just chalk you up as being unable and unwilling even if you were able.
Can't answer a simple question, can you, honey.Lacewing wrote:I guess this means you agree that you are a big dumb baby flapping your pie hole with the same stupid stuff over and over.bobevenson wrote:I guess I'll just chalk you up as being unable and unwilling even if you were able.
I hope somebody has an example of a simple question Bob is having difficulty answering.bobevenson wrote:Can't answer a simple question, can you, honey.
It always has to be about you, doesn't it, pie hole baby?bobevenson wrote:Can't answer a simple question, can you, honey.
FlashDangerpants wrote:I hope somebody has an example of a simple question Bob is having difficulty answering.
Ooo! Ooo! Me sir!!
bobevenson wrote:Theist, agnostic, atheist. As Bob the Baptist, I can tell you that the first and third are fools, and absolute fools at that.
So tell us bob, are you an agnostic or an absolute fool?bobevenson wrote:Anybody who isn't an agnostic is a fool.
Just to be clear, I think you should know that I think everyone else here, already questions your perspective, and just everything else about you. You very probably are on the outside looking in.bobevenson wrote:Wait a minute, are all of you saying that the two letters I mentioned are not mystical in nature, that they are both reasonable letters written with clear minds, and not in any way unusual? If you are, I have to seriously question your perspective.
So Bob isn't even a fool or an absolute fool, he's down a few rungs on that ladder.Arising_uk wrote:FlashDangerpants wrote:I hope somebody has an example of a simple question Bob is having difficulty answering.bobevenson wrote:Theist, agnostic, atheist. As Bob the Baptist, I can tell you that the first and third are fools, and absolute fools at that.
I guess you can't answer the question either, huh?thedoc wrote:Just to be clear, I think you should know that I think everyone else here, already questions your perspective, and just everything else about you. You very probably are on the outside looking in.bobevenson wrote:Wait a minute, are all of you saying that the two letters I mentioned are not mystical in nature, that they are both reasonable letters written with clear minds, and not in any way unusual? If you are, I have to seriously question your perspective.
Always has to be all about you.bobevenson to doc wrote:I guess you can't answer the question either, huh?
Here's a question I know you will never give a straightforward answer to. Do you come to this website to preach?bobevenson wrote:I guess you can't answer the question either, huh?thedoc wrote:Just to be clear, I think you should know that I think everyone else here, already questions your perspective, and just everything else about you. You very probably are on the outside looking in.bobevenson wrote:Wait a minute, are all of you saying that the two letters I mentioned are not mystical in nature, that they are both reasonable letters written with clear minds, and not in any way unusual? If you are, I have to seriously question your perspective.
And you don't understand the answer.bobevenson wrote:I guess you can't answer the question either, huh?thedoc wrote:Just to be clear, I think you should know that I think everyone else here, already questions your perspective, and just everything else about you. You very probably are on the outside looking in.bobevenson wrote:Wait a minute, are all of you saying that the two letters I mentioned are not mystical in nature, that they are both reasonable letters written with clear minds, and not in any way unusual? If you are, I have to seriously question your perspective.
On Bills behalf, Yes.Philosophy Explorer wrote:Here's a question I know you will never give a straightforward answer to. Do you come to this website to preach?bobevenson wrote:I guess you can't answer the question either, huh?thedoc wrote:
Just to be clear, I think you should know that I think everyone else here, already questions your perspective, and just everything else about you. You very probably are on the outside looking in.
PhilX