Philosophy Now Forum

Arising_uk wrote:

HexHammer wrote:Aren't we just lucky, a tiiiny bit of philosophy has relevance!!! ..congratulations!

Not a tiny bit hex, the core of it but then you'd not know this as you have a limited view of Philosophy, if any view at all other than internet forums. There's also Philosophy of Politics which has had a tiny bit of relevance too.

I honestly never seen the effect of it. So I consider it invalid.

HexHammer wrote:I honestly never seen the effect of it. So I consider it invalid.

That's because you know bugger all about this subject as well.

Arising_uk wrote:

HexHammer wrote:I honestly never seen the effect of it. So I consider it invalid.

That's because you know bugger all about this subject as well.

Then please spell it out for me!

HexHammer wrote:Then please spell it out for me!

Paine, Bentham, Mills, Marx, Plato, Seneca, Engels, Smith, Rand, etc, etc and et al. But you've probably never read any of them either.

Or were you talking about how you don't understand how Logic underpins this medium?

HexHammer wrote:Then please spell it out for me!

Y O U A R E I G N O R A N T A B O U T P H I L O S O P H Y.

A N D ARE STUPID ENOUGH TO THINK THAT IS A VIRTUE.

is that clear?

Hobbes' Choice wrote:

HexHammer wrote:Then please spell it out for me!

Y O U A R E I G N O R A N T A B O U T P H I L O S O P H Y.

A N D ARE STUPID ENOUGH TO THINK THAT IS A VIRTUE.

is that clear?

Not to a dog, a small child, or Hex.

Dalek Prime wrote:Not to a dog, a small child, or Hex.

How dare you. I have a dog and small grandchildren and they take umbrage at your insinuation.

Obvious Leo wrote:

Dalek Prime wrote:Not to a dog, a small child, or Hex.

How dare you. I have a dog and small grandchildren and they take umbrage at your insinuation.

I'm glad you don't, Leo.

I was not placed into the same category of imbecile as Hex, as were my family. Presumably I have a category of my own, which suits me better.

Arising_uk wrote:

HexHammer wrote:Then please spell it out for me!

Paine, Bentham, Mills, Marx, Plato, Seneca, Engels, Smith, Rand, etc, etc and et al. But you've probably never read any of them either.

Or were you talking about how you don't understand how Logic underpins this medium?

I do know Marx and Plato ..not the others, but I do know logic are used in computers and some maths tasks, but still there's more to philosphy than just mere logic.

Obvious Leo wrote:I was not placed into the same category of imbecile as Hex, as were my family. Presumably I have a category of my own, which suits me better.

You couldn't give a simple answer, but immediately resorted to name calling and such, you are pathetic!

HexHammer wrote:... but I do know logic are used in computers and some maths tasks, but still there's more to philosphy than just mere logic.

Such as?

If you mean the study of academic philosophy then I think the 'more' is the honing of one's skills in thinking, thoughting and communicating, otherwise I think there very little in Philosophy other than the application of Logic.

Arising_uk wrote:

HexHammer wrote:... but I do know logic are used in computers and some maths tasks, but still there's more to philosphy than just mere logic.

Such as?

If you mean the study of academic philosophy then I think the 'more' is the honing of one's skills in thinking, thoughting and communicating, otherwise I think there very little in Philosophy other than the application of Logic.

Reasoning skills are an important skill, there has been many philosophers that did much more than mere logic.

Are Plato's Cave this math based logic? ..nope! Socratic method?
..dear A_uk ..u don't know what you are talking about!