For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
How could I possibly be getting on anybody's nerves? Anyway, prophecy doesn't require any skill at all, I'm just a messenger.Harbal wrote:I think getting on peoples nerves is your way of amusing yourself but it's not much of a skill, is it?bobevenson wrote: Personality defect? Crazy opinion? What on Earth could you possibly be talking about?
For what or from whom bobby?bobevenson wrote:How could I possibly be getting on anybody's nerves? Anyway, prophecy doesn't require any skill at all, I'm just a messenger.
bobevenson wrote:Theist, agnostic, atheist. As Bob the Baptist, I can tell you that the first and third are fools, and absolute fools at that.
So are you an agnostic or an absolute fool?bobevenson wrote:Anybody who isn't an agnostic is a fool.
I can assure you that you are getting on mine.bobevenson wrote: How could I possibly be getting on anybody's nerves?
Really, why?Harbal wrote:I can assure you that you are getting on mine.bobevenson wrote: How could I possibly be getting on anybody's nerves?
bobevenson wrote:How could I possibly be getting on anybody's nerves?
Harbal wrote:I can assure you that you are getting on mine.
We don't know WHY you keep doing it, we just wish you would stop. Don't you have a lot of product promotion to go do elsewhere... meaning, somewhere where people believe and CARE about what you're talking about (if there even is such a place)? This clearly isn't the right audience (considering how much your claims have been dismissed)... so it seems very foolish for you to continually harp on it here. Further proof that it has no real point or future anywhere, and you know it.bobevenson wrote:Really, why?
Stop doing what?Lacewing wrote:bobevenson wrote:How could I possibly be getting on anybody's nerves?Harbal wrote:I can assure you that you are getting on mine.We don't know WHY you keep doing it, we just wish you would stop.bobevenson wrote:Really, why?
Your supposedly "divine" insights sure seem to leave you clueless a lot. Have you thought of questioning your source? Who is that, by the way? Or do you not know who/what it is that informs you? If you can't say, I'm guessing you don't know... which means you're pulling it all out of your... imagination.bobevenson wrote:Stop doing what?
No Bob, I'm not wading through any more of your deluded and hallucinatory fiction. If you can't answer simple questions right here and right now, instead of pointing off into some black hole, then you HAVE NO ANSWER and your whole platform is BASED ON DIVERSIONS. You ought to know that's cowardly and dishonest.bobevenson wrote:Please see the thread called Last Mystical Ouzo Event.
Imagine that, a pusillanimous poster using the word "cowardly."Lacewing wrote:You ought to know that's cowardly...
Damn you use some big words for a yank.bobevenson wrote:Imagine that, a pusillanimous poster using the word "cowardly."Lacewing wrote:You ought to know that's cowardly...
Don't you mean "yanker", or something similar.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Damn you use some big words for a yank.
Because you are on a philosophy forum and refuse to answer any questions about your thoughts but insist upon repeating them ad nauseum.bobevenson wrote:Really, why?
bobevenson wrote:Theist, agnostic, atheist. As Bob the Baptist, I can tell you that the first and third are fools, and absolute fools at that.
So are you an agnostic or an absolute fool?bobevenson wrote:Anybody who isn't an agnostic is a fool.
Yorkshire pudding, a pudding made of unsweetened batter. Yeah, that sounds about right, although bitter batter would probably be better.Harbal wrote:Don't you mean "yanker", or something similar.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Damn you use some big words for a yank.