For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Way to defend trash, veg.vegetariantaxidermy wrote:You would be 'fat' too if you had 8 children. She's not even fat.Dalek Prime wrote: Fuck you Bob. Octomom gets nine votes, the fat ignorant slob? People get extra votes because they consume more resources after fucking their filthy asses off? Up yours.
So by saying she's not fat, which happens to be true, is 'defending trash'? Someone is either fat or they are not.Dalek Prime wrote:Way to defend trash, veg.vegetariantaxidermy wrote:You would be 'fat' too if you had 8 children. She's not even fat.Dalek Prime wrote: Fuck you Bob. Octomom gets nine votes, the fat ignorant slob? People get extra votes because they consume more resources after fucking their filthy asses off? Up yours.
Whoopee shit. So she doesn't have an ounce on her. She's still trash.vegetariantaxidermy wrote:So by saying she's not fat, which happens to be true, is 'defending trash'? Someone is either fat or they are not.
She gets one vote and her children get one vote. You are one cut above illiterate.Dalek Prime wrote:Octomom gets nine votes...
And do they vote with crayons, fucknut? No, she votes nine times, doofus.bobevenson wrote:She gets one vote and her children get one vote. You are one cut above illiterate.Dalek Prime wrote:Octomom gets nine votes...
God, you are dumber than stupid, she votes as a surrogate for her children in their best interests. What's your fucking problem anyway, are you just plain ignorant or just playing ignorant?Dalek Prime wrote:And do they vote with crayons, fucknut? No, she votes nine times, doofus.bobevenson wrote:She gets one vote and her children get one vote. You are one cut above illiterate.Dalek Prime wrote:Octomom gets nine votes...
Children come under governmental law, and therefore have the right to participate in democratic elections, either directly or through a surrogate committed to their best interests.Dalek Prime wrote:Adult's get a vote. One vote. Children aka political retards, get none. Their interests are served by the parents ie. the family unit.
Just stop.bobevenson wrote:Children come under governmental law, and therefore have the right to participate in democratic elections, either directly or through a surrogate committed to their best interests.Dalek Prime wrote:Adult's get a vote. One vote. Children aka political retards, get none. Their interests are served by the parents ie. the family unit.
Just get off this stupid thread you created, go to The Lounge, and start another stupid thread you can discuss with Philosophy Explorer, an idiot you can relate to.Dalek Prime wrote:Just stop.bobevenson wrote:Children come under governmental law, and therefore have the right to participate in democratic elections, either directly or through a surrogate committed to their best interests.Dalek Prime wrote:Adult's get a vote. One vote. Children aka political retards, get none. Their interests are served by the parents ie. the family unit.
I didn't create this thread. You really can't get anything right, can you Bob?bobevenson wrote: Just get off this stupid thread you created, go to The Lounge, and start another stupid thread you can discuss with Philosophy Explorer, an idiot you can relate to.
I don't know what world you're talking about, Bob. Sounds like fantasy la-la-land. Voting is the LAST THING children give a crap about! They would just like to have enough food and shelter and to be protected FROM all the psychotic and predatory adults they're surrounded by. Voting does very little to ensure any of that. It seems ridiculous to focus on the voting rights of a fetus... by empowering the adults who are producing them to have even MORE SAY when so many babies are being born to very stupid and destructive people who don't know any better.bobevenson wrote:
Children come under governmental law, and therefore have the right to participate in democratic elections, either directly or through a surrogate committed to their best interests.
Boob, stop looking at that mirror (btw, it was me who created this thread stupid).bobevenson wrote:Just get off this stupid thread you created, go to The Lounge, and start another stupid thread you can discuss with Philosophy Explorer, an idiot you can relate to.
I'm sorry, I guess I got you confused with Philosophy Explorer, you're so much alike.Dalek Prime wrote:I didn't create this thread. You really can't get anything right, can you Bob?bobevenson wrote: Just get off this stupid thread you created, go to The Lounge, and start another stupid thread you can discuss with Philosophy Explorer, an idiot you can relate to.
My focus resolves everything. Why do you want to take the vote away from children whose lives are largely controlled by government laws and officials instead of their parents?Lacewing wrote:I don't know what world you're talking about, Bob. Sounds like fantasy la-la-land. Voting is the LAST THING children give a crap about! They would just like to have enough food and shelter and to be protected FROM all the psychotic and predatory adults they're surrounded by. Voting does very little to ensure any of that. It seems ridiculous to focus on the voting rights of a fetus... by empowering the adults who are producing them to have even MORE SAY when so many babies are being born to very stupid and destructive people who don't know any better. Why do you focus on the most bizarre things that really don't seem to resolve anything?bobevenson wrote:
Children come under governmental law, and therefore have the right to participate in democratic elections, either directly or through a surrogate committed to their best interests.