Philosophy Now Forum

Kayla wrote:So, the magic-user with Int 18 and Wis 3 is basically a high functioning (or maybe not so high) autistic

what is int 3 and wis 18 cleric like?

Here's where thestats system breaks down; the two characteristics need to be linked with a minimum difference between the two.
I'd go so far as to say that INT would always have to exceed WIS; with WIS being a function of XP and INT.
Wisdom is a thing that intelligent people gain with time and experience; until it all starts to decline in later life.

Dubious wrote:

Dalek Prime wrote:Fucked if I know, and I recently broke up with my ladyfriend. Ergo, I'm not getting fucked.

...which means it's the ideal time to become a philosopher.

Lots of reading this winter.

Dalek Prime wrote:

Dubious wrote:

Dalek Prime wrote:Fucked if I know, and I recently broke up with my ladyfriend. Ergo, I'm not getting fucked.

...which means it's the ideal time to become a philosopher.

Lots of reading this winter.

Don't forget your wrist support to avoid repetitive strain injury.

It's all in the technique.

If wisdom is the best of all possible synonymns, then it must have the best of all possible effects.

Is it possible that it has no negative effects?

Jaded Sage wrote:If wisdom is the best of all possible synonymns, then it must have the best of all possible effects.

Is it possible that it has no negative effects?

Dude, you ask completely retarded questions, like you have never been outside, and has been sheltered all your life.

What kind of brain damage plagues you?

HexHammer wrote:

Jaded Sage wrote:If wisdom is the best of all possible synonymns, then it must have the best of all possible effects.

Is it possible that it has no negative effects?

Dude, you ask completely retarded questions, like you have never been outside, and has been sheltered all your life.

What kind of brain damage plagues you?

Still looking at that mirror retard? Here's something to help you out at the library loser:

http://www.businessinsider.com/video-ga ... its-2015-9

PhilX

Jaded Sage wrote:If wisdom is the best of all possible synonymns, then it must have the best of all possible effects.

Is it possible that it has no negative effects?

There is no such thing as a best possible synonym unless you say what "wisdom" is synonymous with.
The rest of what you say is thus meaningless.

Philosophy Explorer wrote:

HexHammer wrote:

Jaded Sage wrote:If wisdom is the best of all possible synonymns, then it must have the best of all possible effects.

Is it possible that it has no negative effects?

Dude, you ask completely retarded questions, like you have never been outside, and has been sheltered all your life.

What kind of brain damage plagues you?

Still looking at that mirror retard? Here's something to help you out at the library loser:

http://www.businessinsider.com/video-ga ... its-2015-9

PhilX

No, I'm looking at a tard like you and Jaded, just that Jaded is a bit more intelligent as he can actually pose a question and actually answer some questions, which you can't!

HexHammer wrote:No, I'm looking at a tard like you and Jaded, just that Jaded is a bit more intelligent as he can actually pose a question and actually answer some questions, which you can't!

Jaded Sage is smarter than you. And stop throwing around the horseshit, tard of tards.

PhilX

Jaded Sage wrote:What is wisdom?

Wisdom is how one uses what he possesses. It is basically about the intent.

Intelligence is how much one can know/gather. Knowlege is how huch one has been learned/gathered so far. Wisdom is how one uses his intelligence and acquired knowledge ( or whatever he has in his possession ).

Thus, it is not necessary that a very intelligent and knowledgeable person must be very wise by default. Hackers are generally more intelligent and knowledgeable that original programmers, but they are not wise because they fault intent-wise and misuse their qualities. An ordinary guard is more wise than a very intelligent hacker.

with love,
sanjay

Philosophy Explorer wrote:

HexHammer wrote:No, I'm looking at a tard like you and Jaded, just that Jaded is a bit more intelligent as he can actually pose a question and actually answer some questions, which you can't!

Jaded Sage is smarter than you. And stop throwing around the horseshit, tard of tards.

PhilX

Prove that Jaded is more intelligent that me, because you can't!

HexHammer wrote:

Philosophy Explorer wrote:

HexHammer wrote:No, I'm looking at a tard like you and Jaded, just that Jaded is a bit more intelligent as he can actually pose a question and actually answer some questions, which you can't!

Jaded Sage is smarter than you. And stop throwing around the horseshit, tard of tards.

PhilX

Prove that Jaded is more intelligent that me, because you can't!

Why would I have to prove it to you? It's evident he is.

PhilX

Philosophy Explorer wrote:Why would I have to prove it to you? It's evident he is.

PhilX

You are too stupid, making a claim doesn't make anything true, you have to argue why it's true ..complete tard!!!

HexHammer wrote:

Philosophy Explorer wrote:Why would I have to prove it to you? It's evident he is.

PhilX

You are too stupid, making a claim doesn't make anything true, you have to argue why it's true ..complete tard!!!

You're too stupid to understand an argument loser.

PhilX