For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
No thanks,Hobbes' Choice wrote:You are just wrong.Philosophy Explorer wrote:The internet is no help. I can say the doctor who did the surgery said it was the alcohol that was applied (presumably to an open wound) during the surgery that brought on the pain.
PhilX
Cutting your cock with a sharp knife is painful. Alcohol has nothing to do with it.
Give it a try.
Cutting is not required. Have you ever pinched it with your zipper. Ouch. Many ouches.Hobbes' Choice wrote:You are just wrong.Philosophy Explorer wrote:The internet is no help. I can say the doctor who did the surgery said it was the alcohol that was applied (presumably to an open wound) during the surgery that brought on the pain.
PhilX
Cutting your cock with a sharp knife is painful. Alcohol has nothing to do with it.
Give it a try.
A classical Catch 22 situation. In the absence of alcohol how could such a bizarre idea ever cross your mind?Hobbes' Choice wrote:You are just wrong.Philosophy Explorer wrote:The internet is no help. I can say the doctor who did the surgery said it was the alcohol that was applied (presumably to an open wound) during the surgery that brought on the pain.
PhilX
Cutting your cock with a sharp knife is painful. Alcohol has nothing to do with it.
Give it a try.
The only tortured participant is you Boob.bobevenson wrote:I don't think torturing a baby is ever justified, but torturing most participants in this forum is definitely justified.
Yes, I do understand that, and I believe it constitutes cruel and unusual punishment not permitted by the government under the U.S. Constitution,Hobbes' Choice wrote:The only tortured participant is you Boob.bobevenson wrote:I don't think torturing a baby is ever justified, but torturing most participants in this forum is definitely justified.
Quite right, mate. You should be taken to an offshore island first where you cannot be protected by this inconvenient clause.bobevenson wrote:Yes, I do understand that, and I believe it constitutes cruel and unusual punishment not permitted by the government under the U.S. Constitution,
Constitutions are mere formalities easily informalized whenever deemed necessary. All countries depend on this informal rule regarding the temporary suspension of formalities...the unspoken first law of geopolitics.bobevenson wrote:Yes, I do understand that, and I believe it constitutes cruel and unusual punishment not permitted by the government under the U.S. Constitution,Hobbes' Choice wrote:The only tortured participant is you Boob.bobevenson wrote:I don't think torturing a baby is ever justified, but torturing most participants in this forum is definitely justified.
You can always walk away.bobevenson wrote:Yes, I do understand that, and I believe it constitutes cruel and unusual punishment not permitted by the government under the U.S. Constitution,Hobbes' Choice wrote:The only tortured participant is you Boob.bobevenson wrote:I don't think torturing a baby is ever justified, but torturing most participants in this forum is definitely justified.
Children can't give consent to being born and coming into existence. Hence procreation is unethical. Why in one case and not the other?Obvious Leo wrote:I'll be happy to provide complimentary alcohol in vast quantities to all patients who present for circumcision surgery at my chainsaw clinic. However all such applicants must provide proof of age because performing such procedures on children who are unable to give informed consent is unethical conduct in the world according to Dr Leo.Philosophy Explorer wrote:Just to let you know, it's not the circumcision that makes the baby cry, it's the alcohol (don't know which type).vegetariantaxidermy wrote:People who have their babies circumcised obviously think torturing babies is justified.
PhilX
Giving life is not considered harmful, mutilating a baby's penis is.Dalek Prime wrote:Children can't give consent to being born and coming into existence. Hence procreation is unethical. Why in one case and not the other?Obvious Leo wrote:I'll be happy to provide complimentary alcohol in vast quantities to all patients who present for circumcision surgery at my chainsaw clinic. However all such applicants must provide proof of age because performing such procedures on children who are unable to give informed consent is unethical conduct in the world according to Dr Leo.Philosophy Explorer wrote: Just to let you know, it's not the circumcision that makes the baby cry, it's the alcohol (don't know which type).
PhilX
Birth is not considered a harm by some, true, but not by all. Just as circumcision is considered mutilation by some, but not all. I'm not buying your generalized pronouncement as fact.Hobbes' Choice wrote:
Giving life is not considered harmful, mutilating a baby's penis is.
Hobbes' Choice wrote:You are just wrong.Philosophy Explorer wrote:The internet is no help. I can say the doctor who did the surgery said it was the alcohol that was applied (presumably to an open wound) during the surgery that brought on the pain.
PhilX
Cutting your cock with a sharp knife is painful. Alcohol has nothing to do with it.
Give it a try.
I can't try it but I imagine it would hurt...a lot. What a bloody idiot that doctor must be to say something so moronic. I suppose having your leg sawn off wouldn't hurt either--it would only be the alcohol that you poured on the gaping wound that would hurt.It is highly unlikely that alcohol has any part of a circumscision, in any event.vegetariantaxidermy wrote:Hobbes' Choice wrote:You are just wrong.Philosophy Explorer wrote:The internet is no help. I can say the doctor who did the surgery said it was the alcohol that was applied (presumably to an open wound) during the surgery that brought on the pain.
PhilX
Cutting your cock with a sharp knife is painful. Alcohol has nothing to do with it.
Give it a try.