Philosophy Now Forum

ok then we start with a neutral that has never happened.we split the neutral and get a negative and positive differentual which gives a happening locality inside the never happened neutral or nonlocal.time is abstracted from the neutral to give a space effect to the now happening event.the consciousness of an observer takes on this position of neutrality when measuring c. as a part pf the neutral mover .

jackles wrote:ha .yyou cleverly avoid issues you cant explain or understand with your basic knowledged. ...

But I just explained my understanding? I think you mean you can't understand or accept a simple explanation because you are always looking elsewhere for an explanation of the obvious and in the main have a metaphysical explanation that you think explains all but pretty much says nothing.

you would make a great soliciter arising .ha.

Why? What am I asking for?

thats it arising .i am trying to explain nothing.which you seem to think is a blank nothing.what it comes down to my nothings not the same as your nothing.my nothings alive.you cant understand how nothing can be alive.life is more than something its nothing as well.something and nothing are both alive states of the same existance.one moves one dosnt.

jackles wrote:thats it arising .i am trying to explain nothing.which you seem to think is a blank nothing.what it comes down to my nothings not the same as your nothing.my nothings alive.you cant understand how nothing can be alive.life is more than something its nothing as well.something and nothing are both alive states of the same existance.one moves one dosnt.

No, I think 'nothing' doesn't exist. I also think life is exactly 'something' and not more or less than it. Unlike you I'm a nihilist when it comes to the universe and have little need for metaphysical explanations of consciousness, I also think that whilst reductionism has its place in explanation it should stop at the least lowest place where it makes sense. So with respect to consciousness and self-consciousness the body and its senses is and will be enough to explain them, not least because we'll be building neural-net computers that will challenge our definitions of life, consciousness and self-consciousness. No need for the physicists 'quantum tubules', etc.

well each to there own arising.either way we end up nonmoving.ha

jackles wrote:well each to there own arising.either way we end up nonmoving.ha

Well we all end-up dead I'll agree with that.