Page 3 of 3
Re: no moving things in heaven
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 9:10 pm
by uwot
Like I said:
uwot wrote:I meant to ask, Poor Bill: what do you mean by 'dimension'?
Your wikipedia link doesn't address the issue, Poor Bill; you don't appear to understand your own context:
Bill Wiltrack wrote:Wisdom cannot be linked to. It doesn't matter how many links I share with you - you are limited as far as your capacity for understanding. Each of us are. That is what is known as living in a multidimensional continuum.
Our limited capacity for understanding is not related to our mathematical environment.
Re: no moving things in heaven
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 10:30 pm
by Blaggard
Time is the next dimension time is one of 4, get over it.
Re: no moving things in heaven
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 11:14 pm
by uwot
Blaggard wrote:Time is the next dimension time is one of 4, get over it.
Who's that to, Blaggard?
Re: no moving things in heaven
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 11:23 pm
by Bill Wiltrack
.
Look, I DON'T CARE if you understand or accept the fact that time is considered to be the fourth dimension.
That's your rough sea...not mine.
..................................................................
Good day.
.
Re: no moving things in heaven
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 11:47 pm
by uwot
I'm still trying to untangle this, Poor Bill.
Bill Wiltrack wrote:All things exist; ALL possibilities, exist at the same time.
We are approaching infinity when we try to understand another dimension, which is time.
We cannot conceive it.
As I said, conceiving time is not difficult.
Re: no moving things in heaven
Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2014 3:08 am
by Bill Wiltrack
.
.................................................Alright...
.................................................
............................................................................Then my work here is done.
.
Re: no moving things in heaven
Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2014 8:24 am
by uwot
Bill Wiltrack wrote:Then my work here is done.
Poor Bill, if it was your intention to make meaningless statements about concepts, of which you wish to demonstrate your lack of understanding, job done. Do you not think you should aim higher?
Re: no moving things in heaven
Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2014 8:36 am
by Ginkgo
uwot wrote:Bill Wiltrack wrote:Then my work here is done.
Poor Bill, if it was your intention to make meaningless statements about concepts, of which you wish to demonstrate your lack of understanding, job done. Do you not think you should aim higher?
Bill's example of a recondite representation of a 4 D object is based on the principles of 3 D geometry.
What Bill doesn't realize is that time as a 4th dimension is a different concept altogether.