Page 3 of 7

Re: rome

Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 8:02 pm
by jackles
rome =bricks and morter.the humble brick should be the emblem of rome.you are livin or workin in them now.just look around you your roman.

Re: rome

Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 10:10 pm
by reasonvemotion
Catholicism follows tradition and the decrees of the Pope and church councils as religious authority.

"Did God intend that the Bible alone should be the guide to salvation?

No,

because certain things in the Bible can be misunderstood, and because the Bible does not have everything God taught" - Catechism, p. 51.


"Do we get from the Bible alone all our knowledge and certainty about what God has told us?

No,

"Council … assemblies of the rulers of the Church legally convoked, for the discussion and decision of ecclesiastical affairs … The decrees of general councils have no binding authority till confirmed by the Pope …

The infallibility of general councils so confirmed follows from that of the Church…" - Dictionary, pp. 227-230.


"Does Jesus require us to follow the Pope in matters of religion?

Yes,

because obedience and loyalty to the Pope are among the chief requirements of Our Lord's plan for unity … Can the Pope make an error when teaching religion? Not when he is speaking solemnly (ex cathedra) as head of the church. Then he has that special protection from error which God gives as a spiritual safeguard for all the members of the church" - Catechism, p. 56.

Jackles wrote:
The church had its beginings in rome........
Are you Catholic by chance Jackles?

Re: rome

Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2013 5:40 am
by Arising_uk
Hobbes' Choice wrote:I think you mean the Lex Romana?
Fair point but I think they all seek the Pax Augusta.

Re: rome

Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 11:26 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
jackles wrote:rome =bricks and morter.the humble brick should be the emblem of rome.you are livin or workin in them now.just look around you your roman.
Rome did not invent bricks.
Neither did they invent mortar.
However concrete of Roman origin, if you really want to pursue this idiotic line of argument.

Re: rome

Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 11:47 pm
by jackles
who knows who first used a piece of clay to do some construction.it is not important who first used a lump of clay.what matters is the the system that made the most use of of a bricks convienience for use in construction.that system was and still is rome.the brick is the single most important man made item.you can see the result of there use from space.

Re: rome

Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 11:54 am
by Brit Dems
ROME?

Protestantism is a Northern European IC1 Nordic Caucasoid Baltic thing.

Catholicism is a Southern European IC2 Roman Melanochroid Mediterranean Balkan thing.

Re: rome

Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 1:04 pm
by jackles
rome is a universal city.with many faults.but petty racial discrimination isnt one of them faults.it rome is universal.ninconpoops have no real lasting influence on the system.

Re: rome

Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 2:23 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
jackles wrote:who knows who first used a piece of clay to do some construction.it is not important who first used a lump of clay.what matters is the the system that made the most use of of a bricks convienience for use in construction.that system was and still is rome.the brick is the single most important man made item.you can see the result of there use from space.
Archaeologists know that bricks were invented before there was so much as a mud hut in the area known as Rome.

Rome does not represent a system that made most use. Only a fool would think so.

The British Rail system used more bricks than Rome ever did.

There are more brick in the Brighton Viaduct than exist in ANY structure in Rome.

Image

The Wall of China is the structure most quoted in "seen from Space" mentions. It is NOT Roman and it is NOT made of bricks.

You are an ignoramus.

And before you tell me "wot about the ROMAN ARCH", The Romans did not invent the arch.
Arches were common place in Mesopotamia in the 2ndC BC.

Re: rome

Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 2:28 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
jackles wrote:rome is a universal city.with many faults.but petty racial discrimination isnt one of them faults.it rome is universal.ninconpoops have no real lasting influence on the system.
As the 18thC & 19thC Pope sanctioned race based slavery I think you might be a moron.

Re: rome

Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 3:20 pm
by jackles
small side tributaries in the main flow.you seem to be stuck in a creek some place.get in the flow .

Re: rome

Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 7:52 pm
by jackles
you misunderstand the meaning of rome.all citys are rome .its the system that runs the cities of this world that is roman.roman government.government is rome.taxation

Re: rome

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2013 12:28 am
by jackles
yes i did say that .the roman system was woven in to history and is the loom on which modern citys and towns are built..rome plays a part of an average joes day in any town or city on the globe.globle is roman

Re: rome

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2013 8:28 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
jackles wrote:you misunderstand the meaning of rome.all citys are rome .its the system that runs the cities of this world that is roman.roman government.government is rome.taxation
I misunderstand nothing.
If you really think all cities are Rome you are doing two things.
1) Being an idiot.
2) reducing anything you say about Rome to meaningless bullshit.

Re: rome

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2013 8:30 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
jackles wrote:bob rome dos have electric lights i was there the other week and they were all working ok.
You said Rome was every city on earth. SO how were you there?

Re: rome

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2013 8:31 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
jackles wrote:brighton is the sea side resort to london.otherwise known as londiniam.finace capital of the world and its neo roman to the core.rome with electric lights.
SO you are saying that Brighton is Rome with lights, and London is Rome with lights and Rome is Rome with lights.

You are also saying that Rome is Brighton to the core!