Philosophy Now Forum

Bill Wiltrack wrote:.What?...I try an be nice.

So what use the thousand words.Thats the trouble with pictures, as the artists have found, they never quite say what you want them to say. Unlike words of course.

You want to be nice? Try discussing your posts when others raise questions.

A person can impress by subtle things. By the absence of ... certain elements which make you feel weary.

duszek wrote:A person can impress by subtle things. By the absence of ... certain elements which make you feel weary.

You tired and want to be manipulated? Be my guest.

Philosophically Bill is outright barking. If he's not then he's outright manipulative, if not then it's back to barking. Me, I just think him another in a long-line of gnus.

Have you ever tried to manipulate me, Arising ?
I haven´t noticed so far.

Do you work for the secret service ?
That would explain your (secret) credentials ...
And your invisible skills.

"Arising_uk"

Philosophically Bill is outright barking. If he's not then he's outright manipulative, if not then it's back to barking. Me, I just think him another in a long-line of gnus

You seem to have accused Bill Wiltrack of not being philosophical in terms of his Eastern
mysticism. Can you tell me at what juncture Philosophy became a science ?

duszek wrote:Have you ever tried to manipulate me, Arising ?
I haven´t noticed so far.

Do you work for the secret service ?
That would explain your (secret) credentials ...
And your invisible skills.

He works for the chicken service .

.











................................................













.

Lakin wrote:You seem to have accused Bill Wiltrack of not being philosophical in terms of his Eastern
mysticism. ...

Nope, I accuse Bill of not following the Eastern tradition whilst cobbling together his own pseudo version. I accuse Bill of being antithetical towards the Western tradition in his support for illiteracy and his anti-reason stance. And last but not least for a stance based upon, by his own admittance, no reading of the subject itself.

Can you tell me at what juncture Philosophy became a science ?

Where do I imply it is?

Lakin wrote:He works for the chicken service .

Worthy of a DPhil in English.

.








.........................Come here you.....................









.

Stock footage from you.

As I've told you before, post this stuff in a psych forum as the Freudians would just love the messages your subconscious is sending you.

"Arising_uk"

Nope, I accuse Bill of not following the Eastern tradition whilst cobbling together his own pseudo version. I accuse Bill of being antithetical towards the Western tradition in his support for illiteracy and his anti-reason stance. And last but not least for a stance based upon, by his own admittance, no reading of the subject itself.

I will ask you again since you don't get it : Can you tell me at what juncture Philosophy became a science.

Arising_uk wrote:

Lakin wrote:He works for the chicken service .

Worthy of a DPhil in English.

And you are worthy of DipShit in Philosophy.

And I'll reply once again, where do I imply it is?

Tell you what, because I appear to be slow, why don't you tell me the implication you are trying to raise.

Lakin wrote:And you are worthy of DipShit in Philosophy.

Nah! BA(Hons) is all I managed with respect to Philososhit.