Philosophy Now Forum

Arising_uk wrote:Do you take an oath in civil jobs?

Fuck your oaths, oaths don't mean shit in a free society, my friend!

bobevenson wrote:Fuck your oaths, oaths don't mean shit in a free society, my friend!

I'd have thought keeping ones oath or word is a prerequisite in a free society?

Arising_uk wrote:

bobevenson wrote:Fuck your oaths, oaths don't mean shit in a free society, my friend!

I'd have thought keeping ones oath or word is a prerequisite in a free society?

As an inhabitant of England and Europe, you know nothing about a free society or what it's based on.

bobevenson wrote:As an inhabitant of England and Europe, you know nothing about a free society or what it's based on.

We have 800 years experience of what its based on.

You Yanks should now that as you inherited it.

That your word is worth nothing is of no surprise to me.

Arising_uk wrote:We have 800 years experience of what its based on.

You have 800 years of using the Magna Carta for toilet paper.

bobevenson wrote:You have 800 years of using the Magna Carta for toilet paper.

Of course we do boob.

Arising_uk wrote:

bobevenson wrote:You have 800 years of using the Magna Carta for toilet paper.

Of course we do boob.

Well, I'm glad we agree on something.

Nice to see the confirmation and selective reading bias is unaffected by the meds, amazing the power of the delusional mind.

Oh, now you want to change your story again, like you always do when you're in an untenable position!

bobevenson wrote:Oh, now you want to change your story again, like you always do when you're in an untenable position!

You mean like how you change subject to insults whenever asked about what you actually mean?

Didn't you see the in the post that you edited in your reply? If not, this is what I mean by your selective and confirmational delusions.

Arising_uk wrote:

bobevenson wrote:Oh, now you want to change your story again, like you always do when you're in an untenable position!

You mean like how you change subject to insults whenever asked about what you actually mean?

Didn't you see the in the post that you edited in your reply? If not, this is what I mean by your selective and confirmational delusions.

People who use multiple emoticons as a substitute for logic don't deserve a reply.

bobevenson wrote:

Arising_uk wrote:

bobevenson wrote:Oh, now you want to change your story again, like you always do when you're in an untenable position!

You mean like how you change subject to insults whenever asked about what you actually mean?

Didn't you see the in the post that you edited in your reply? If not, this is what I mean by your selective and confirmational delusions.

People who use multiple emoticons as a substitute for logic don't deserve a reply.

See the logical problem above?

Arising_uk wrote:See the logical problem above?

The logical problem is that you substitute emoticons for thinking.

bobevenson wrote:The logical problem is that you substitute emoticons for thinking.

So thats a no then. No surprise there.

No, I use them to indicate the emotion I'm having at the time, the clue is in the name.

Arising_uk wrote:

bobevenson wrote:The logical problem is that you substitute emoticons for thinking.

So thats a no then. No surprise there.

No, I use them to indicate the emotion I'm having at the time, the clue is in the name.

Then you must be a woman, transsexual or gay, which explains why you refuse to state your gender. Do you also have hot flashes? And anyway, who the hell cares what emotion you're feeling at the time. Why do you have to tell us about it? Tell it to your shrink!