Page 3 of 7
Re: Taxation Policy of Evensonomics
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 3:02 pm
by bobevenson
Arising_uk wrote:I think I'll leave the "worship" to you godbotherers thanks.
I don't care how many times you use your made-up word "godbotherers," but they're still not going to put it in the dictionary.
Re: Taxation Policy of Evensonomics
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 3:03 pm
by Arising_uk
Who cares?
Re: Taxation Policy of Evensonomics
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 3:08 pm
by bobevenson
Arising_uk wrote:Who cares?
I'm sure you do since you use your little made-up word all the time. Why don't you ask the Merriam-Webster Company why your continuous use of the word doesn't qualify it for a new entry in their dictionary?
Re: Taxation Policy of Evensonomics
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:19 pm
by mickthinks
- Is there anybody else out there that wants to take me on?
Re: Taxation Policy of Evensonomics
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:36 pm
by bobevenson
mickthinks wrote:Is there anybody else out there that wants to take me on?
All I can say is that your posts get dumber and dumber.
Re: Taxation Policy of Evensonomics
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:47 pm
by Arising_uk
Says the boob who's just misquoted and insulted himself!
Re: Taxation Policy of Evensonomics
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:50 pm
by Arising_uk
bobevenson wrote:... Why don't you ask the Merriam-Webster Company why your continuous use of the word doesn't qualify it for a new entry in their dictionary?
You want to be French!? Since when have dictionaries been the arbitrators of the English language?
Re: Taxation Policy of Evensonomics
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 9:38 pm
by bobevenson
Arising_uk wrote:bobevenson wrote:... Why don't you ask the Merriam-Webster Company why your continuous use of the word doesn't qualify it for a new entry in their dictionary?
You want to be French!? Since when have dictionaries been the arbitrators of the English language?
I believe you meant arbitors, not arbitrators, but that's OK since you know so little about the English language.
Re: Taxation Policy of Evensonomics
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 10:57 pm
by Arising_uk
The thing I like about you boob is the consistency with which you avoid philosophical points.
Either can be used in English. English is at base two languages, French and 'English' Saxon, although with the history of Britain and its empire its quite a polyglot, so theres pretty much always two words meaning the same thing in English. Its also why other nations have accepted it as a trade language between their emigres.
Re: Taxation Policy of Evensonomics
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:59 pm
by bobevenson
I believe that the entire world uses American English for official airline communications.
Re: Taxation Policy of Evensonomics
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 10:19 pm
by Arising_uk
And that has what to do with you answering previous questions about your taxation 'policy'?
Re: Taxation Policy of Evensonomics
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:05 pm
by bobevenson
Arising_uk wrote:And that has what to do with you answering previous questions about your taxation 'policy'?
a) I was merely responding to your stupid post on language.
b) You keep referring to previous questions on taxation under Evensonomics, but you never say what those questions are. Good God, spit it out!!!
Re: Taxation Policy of Evensonomics
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 4:58 am
by Arising_uk
Fackin' 'ell!!
How dense are you!?
I've learnt from experience, as obviously have others. So no, I won't. Not until you go back and check your posts and give a considered reply to the more sensible of the questions there.
Re: Taxation Policy of Evensonomics
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 2:46 pm
by Felasco
A 3 page long thread about whether to have a thread. He he....
And now all you god bothering boobs and anti-boobs, answer my question, or ask my question, or question whether I am questioning your question about questioning the role of questioning on a philosophy forum. I demand a response to this challenge, and I mean
NOW!!!
Ok, your turn...
Re: Taxation Policy of Evensonomics
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 9:06 pm
by Impenitent
I don't know is on third
-Imp