Philosophy Now Forum

Imagine what the world is descending into when it takes several convoluted paragraphs to try to say what a woman (a word that needs no defining) is in order to hopefully stop up every loophole, nook and cranny that men and troons will be going over with a magnifying glass and gaggle of lawyers to find. Utterly pitiful.

accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Apr 06, 2025 8:00 am Imagine what the world is descending into when it takes several convoluted paragraphs to try to say what a woman (a word that needs no defining) is in order to hopefully stop up every loophole, nook and cranny that men and troons will be going over with a magnifying glass and gaggle of lawyers to find. Utterly pitiful.

I'm straight, but there are so many men called ladyboys, that are far more attractive than an average Australian/English/NZ/USA woman here...that do happen to have something akin to what i have dangling between my legs. Doesn't mean I am on team Dangerpants...just a point. I do find many of them physically attractive.

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Apr 06, 2025 8:07 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Apr 06, 2025 8:00 am Imagine what the world is descending into when it takes several convoluted paragraphs to try to say what a woman (a word that needs no defining) is in order to hopefully stop up every loophole, nook and cranny that men and troons will be going over with a magnifying glass and gaggle of lawyers to find. Utterly pitiful.

I'm straight, but there are so many men called ladyboys, that are far more attractive than an average Australian/English/NZ/USA woman here...that do happen to have something akin to what i have dangling between my legs. Doesn't mean I am on team Dangerpants...just a point. I do find many of them physically attractive.

You aren't straight then. I've seen them and I was shocked because they were so obviously male, after hearing how men 'can't tell'. You are all so bloody dumb (or pretend to be). Besides, what the f does that have to do with anything? I'm not talking about sexual orientation. A woman doesn't have to look like anything. They just 'are'. I could never be attracted to those weird mickey-mouse voiced 'transmen' who think they look like men with their tiny little hands and feet and squeaky voices. Still, they can think what they like. They will never be men.

accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Apr 06, 2025 8:35 am

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Apr 06, 2025 8:07 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Apr 06, 2025 8:00 am Imagine what the world is descending into when it takes several convoluted paragraphs to try to say what a woman (a word that needs no defining) is in order to hopefully stop up every loophole, nook and cranny that men and troons will be going over with a magnifying glass and gaggle of lawyers to find. Utterly pitiful.

I'm straight, but there are so many men called ladyboys, that are far more attractive than an average Australian/English/NZ/USA woman here...that do happen to have something akin to what i have dangling between my legs. Doesn't mean I am on team Dangerpants...just a point. I do find many of them physically attractive.

You aren't straight then. I've seen them and I was shocked because they were so obviously male, after hearing how men 'can't tell'. You are all so bloody dumb (or pretend to be).

U got no idea. Last night while my buddy was busy talking to an expat mate...this "girl" on all accounts to my VERY discerning eye finally admitted to me, since I saw others in the group that were OBVIOUS wearers of dick, that oui, this very attractive sheboy did in fact have an appendage between "her" legs.

SE ASIA, the lines of discerning the differences becomes EXTREMELY difficult ...trust me, I like VERY FEMININE ladies, and some of these have got me questioning that boundary..

*atto waits for the super anti MAN to have her say of my "" nonsense"" - i must be stuck in some Narnia Closet full of straight men that are blinded by cock*

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Apr 06, 2025 8:44 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Apr 06, 2025 8:35 am

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Apr 06, 2025 8:07 am

I'm straight, but there are so many men called ladyboys, that are far more attractive than an average Australian/English/NZ/USA woman here...that do happen to have something akin to what i have dangling between my legs. Doesn't mean I am on team Dangerpants...just a point. I do find many of them physically attractive.

You aren't straight then. I've seen them and I was shocked because they were so obviously male, after hearing how men 'can't tell'. You are all so bloody dumb (or pretend to be).

U got no idea. Last night while my buddy was busy talking to an expat mate...this "girl" on all accounts to my VERY discerning eye finally admitted to me, since I saw others in the group that were OBVIOUS wearers of dick, that oui, this very attractive sheboy did in fact have an appendage between "her" legs.

SE ASIA, the lines of discerning the differences becomes EXTREMELY difficult ...trust me, I like VERY FEMININE ladies, and some of these have got me questioning that boundary..

*atto waits for the super anti MAN to have her say of my "" nonsense"" - i must be stuck in some Narnia Closet full of straight men that are blinded by cock*

Oh whatever. Delude yourself then. You are obviously gay.

Not much point in talking to me. I can only make two comments at the most then get violently thrust out of here by 'cloudflare' or whatever the f it's called. Thanks for the 'help' IT expert

...UR hilarious, but honestly, since u prefer female tech support, I will change genders lata, after someone teaches me the nuances of USA version of playing pool..

U did say you rebooted your PC tho?

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Apr 06, 2025 8:44 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Apr 06, 2025 8:35 am

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Apr 06, 2025 8:07 am

I'm straight, but there are so many men called ladyboys, that are far more attractive than an average Australian/English/NZ/USA woman here...that do happen to have something akin to what i have dangling between my legs. Doesn't mean I am on team Dangerpants...just a point. I do find many of them physically attractive.

You aren't straight then. I've seen them and I was shocked because they were so obviously male, after hearing how men 'can't tell'. You are all so bloody dumb (or pretend to be).

U got no idea. Last night while my buddy was busy talking to an expat mate...this "girl" on all accounts to my VERY discerning eye finally admitted to me, since I saw others in the group that were OBVIOUS wearers of dick, that oui, this very attractive sheboy did in fact have an appendage between "her" legs.

SE ASIA, the lines of discerning the differences becomes EXTREMELY difficult ...trust me, I like VERY FEMININE ladies, and some of these have got me questioning that boundary..

*atto waits for the super anti MAN to have her say of my "" nonsense"" - i must be stuck in some Narnia Closet full of straight men that are blinded by cock*

Interesting that you mentioned the 'ladyboys'. There's a youtube video of one of them being 'interviewed' by some sleazy white American man who kept referring to the charming ladyboy as 'she' and calling him a lady. The ladyboy repeatedly insisted (in a distinct male voice) 'I'm not a lady, I'm a ladyBOY'. They know exactly who they are and that they aren't women. It's the same with the Samoan fa'afafine. They would never dream of claiming to be women, or demand special pronouns, or encroach on women's rights. That's the domain of entitled, (pretty much all white as far as I can tell) Western men, and the rabid misogyny and fetishism that's at the core of it is 'Western' too. This claptrap that they are 'actual' women, and which they have managed to bring into law, is something they've cooked up recently and are now taking full advantage of. We see it in sports, in changing rooms---anywhere that was previously for women only. A woman in Australia has had her life turned upside-down because she started an app for lesbians and (of course) was inundated with creepy men claiming to be 'lesbians', and is now embroiled in a lengthy and costly court case with one of these vile men. It's too bizarre and twisted to even think about really. Google 'Tickle versus Giggle'.
The vast majority of these men aren't even what you would call 'effeminate'. They are simply opportunistic perverts who most likely spend the majority of their time as bog standard men, with all the privileges and advantages that go with being men.

''Two men will face each other for a women's championship title at the Ultimate Pool Women's Pro Series Event 2 tonight in Wigan, UK.

Harriet Haynes and Lucy Smith, both men, beat all female competitors to take the spots in the women's final event.''

It beggars belief. Do men have no shame or capacity for embarrassment? WTF is wrong with you? It's akin to 'competing' with children (and yes, they do THAT too!).

Men have more strength, longer reach and faster-twitch muscles that make it easier to execute many shots (especially power shots like the break and power draw) with more accuracy, control, and consistency.

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Fri Apr 04, 2025 10:38 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Apr 04, 2025 10:04 pm

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Fri Apr 04, 2025 9:53 pm
I only gave the video a quick glance to make sure it set the right thing the right way and I woulddn't get shouted at. It seemed fine.

I've seen you have weird problems with other sites. You insisted to me once that it was quite impossible for you to open an article on Rolling Stone without subscribing, and you were absolutely 100% wrong, all you needed to do was click an X. And I've seen you and only you have a similar problem at tiktok for a video that works absolutely fine and all you have to do to access it is a simple image dragging game to show the site you aren't a bot.

Nobody is going to spend actual engineering time to pick on you, but a VPN might well sort out whatever your routing problem is. Speaking of which... Nobody has put parental controls on your computer have they?

You just can't help yourself. I changed the DNS server to what you said and followed the video so I don't know why you're bringing up other old stuff. I have no interest in TikTok and I'm not familiar with how it works. And that 'x' was NOT obvious on that Rolling Stone article. There are many sites where you have to subscribe in order to read articles. Why are men such know-it-alls, especially when it comes to computers? Patronising gits. I can fix most things without help. Not everyone's a nerd. Some people like to stretch their limbs and do other stuff

I'm merely correcting the untrue assertion that this is a one-off thing. You are the person who most often claims internet things don't work when nobody else has a problem with them.

It wasn't an idle question to mock you for being geriatric. Does anybody else have control of your computer and might they have set parental controls on it?

If you open up a powershell window (just go start and type "powershell") Paste these lookup commands into it...

Test-NetConnection forum.philosophynow.org
curl forum.philosophynow.org
Get-DnsClientCache | where entry -like "*philosophynow*"
Get-NetIPConfiguration

You can safely paste the output here, none of them will return anything that can be used to hack you.
edit: maybe take out the wifi network name from the netIpConfig - somebody weird could try something silly with that.

The forum will completely mangle the responses if you paste them in the raw, but it should be fine if you place them inside the </> code blocks.

Returns should look like something like this

Code: Select all

Get-DnsClientCache | where entry -like "*philosophynow*"

Entry                     RecordName                Record Status    Section TimeTo Data   Data
                                                    Type                     Live   Length
-----                     ----------                ------ ------    ------- ------ ------ ----
forum.philosophynow.org   forum.philosophynow.org   AAAA   Success   Answer     292     16 2606:4700:20::ac43:44c6
forum.philosophynow.org   forum.philosophynow.org   AAAA   Success   Answer     292     16 2606:4700:20::681a:368
forum.philosophynow.org   forum.philosophynow.org   AAAA   Success   Answer     292     16 2606:4700:20::681a:268
forum.philosophynow.org   forum.philosophynow.org   A      Success   Answer     292      4 172.67.68.198
forum.philosophynow.org   forum.philosophynow.org   A      Success   Answer     292      4 104.26.3.104
forum.philosophynow.org   forum.philosophynow.org   A      Success   Answer     292      4 104.26.2.104
forum.philosophynow.org   forum.philosophynow.org   A      Success   Answer     292      4 172.67.68.198
forum.philosophynow.org   forum.philosophynow.org   A      Success   Answer     292      4 104.26.3.104
forum.philosophynow.org   forum.philosophynow.org   A      Success   Answer     292      4 104.26.2.104

The curl command is supposed to fail, it should give an error code of 403.

Code: Select all

curl forum.philosophynow.org
curl : The remote server returned an error: (403) Forbidden.
At line:1 char:1
+ curl forum.philosophynow.org
+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    + CategoryInfo          : InvalidOperation: (System.Net.HttpWebRequest:HttpWebRequest) [Invoke-WebRequest], WebException
    + FullyQualifiedErrorId : WebCmdletWebResponseException,Microsoft.PowerShell.Commands.InvokeWebRequestCommand

Then what? And what do you mean by 'take out the wifi network name? There doesn't seem to be any way to do that.

accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Apr 07, 2025 2:19 am Then what? And what do you mean by 'take out the wifi network name? There doesn't seem to be any way to do that.

Just paste the output from the commands in your reply. Using [ code ] blocks so that it doesn't get mangled up.
Don't worry bout the wifi name it's harmless. But feel free to edit that bit with ****** because it's also meaningless in this context.

If the Don goes full retard and starts coming down like an autocrat claiming a national emergency or some nonsense, it'll be the 18th century new world proletariat's fault.

Had they stopped the wealthy proto-industrial capitalist beaurocrats from making the constitution supreme law, the Don wouldn't be able to take advantage of problems created by capitalism to issue a capitalist takeover of the country to save it.

See what i mean? You're gonna hear that the things Don's drastic authoritarian presidential orders are saving us from are radical leftist things. But this can't possibly be true because problems created by marxism can't arise in a capitalist society.

So you have a capitalist system that is creating all kinds of social and economic monstrosities that capitalism will call leftist - securing the support of the brainwashed voters (all working class) - and then apply capitalism even harder in an effort to get out of the mess capitalism created.

Trump's the best.
He's acceleration America's decline.

He was right about the LGBTJEWMNOP+ madness...but this crap is slightly less insane.
America is an insane asylum inmate who stops cross dressing, to put on a uniform and pretend he's Napoleon.