Philosophy Now Forum

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 9:05 am**

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:36 amSlippery slope.

Soon it will be "Get off my lawn!"

Bit late. Already tried Foxtrot Oscar. Loada good that did.

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 10:11 am**

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:50 am
Age wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:40 am Most people usually do ignore me when I POINT OUT the Truth to them in regards to what they do NOT like to LOOK AT and/or SEE.
No. Most people ignore you because you are a bore.

Is that a fact, or a story?

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:50 amA bore is someone who deprives you of solitude without providing you with company. --Oscar Wilde

You seem to NOT want solitude, as you keep replying and thus depriving me of same.

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 10:18 am**

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:54 am
Age wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:49 am WHY does a self-reporting "computer scientist" say that the term 'infinite Universe' is describing a BOUNDED universe? Thanks

Some might say that that is a totally illogical thing to say, especially for some one with such credentials as a "computer scientist".
"SOME" are not here to say anything. Only Age is here, saying things.

Age should choose an answer.

A. ∞ + 1 = ∞
B. ∞ + 1 > ∞

Till then. Age can fuck off

So, I answer the question posted earlier. You do NOT like that answer so possessions the same question in a slightly different way.

All you ever seem to want to do here, in this forum, is find some one to CHOOSE a true/false, yes/no, or one/other answer, and then do whatever it is that you want to SHOW.

By the way what is it that you want to SHOW in this forum?

Also, WHY does a self-reporting "computer scientist" say that the term 'infinite Universe' is describing a BOUNDED universe?

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 10:34 am**

Age wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 10:11 am Is that a fact, or a story?

What's the difference?

Age wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 10:11 am You seem to NOT want solitude, as you keep replying and thus depriving me of same.

I never said I want solitude. Why did you assume that?

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 10:38 am**

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 10:34 am I never said I want solitude. Why did you assume that?

For the same reason you assumed Age was a bore that bores you to the point that you feel the need to tell him to fuck off. Why don't you just fuck off instead? problem solved.

You really are a silly one aren't you?

.

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 10:46 am**

Age wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 10:18 am By the way what is it that you want to SHOW in this forum?

What I am showing is that choice is more fundamental than "truth".

You are searching for a "Truth that stands on its own".
That's called an axiom.

All axioms are arbitrary choices.

Age wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 10:18 am Also, WHY does a self-reporting "computer scientist" say that the term 'infinite Universe' is describing a BOUNDED universe?

Because there is a choice between two axioms:

A. ∞ + 1 > ∞
B ∞ + 1 = ∞

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 10:48 am**

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 10:38 am For the same reason you assumed Age was a bore that bores you to the point that you feel the need to tell him to fuck off. Why don't you just fuck off instead? problem solved.

You really are a silly one aren't you?

And what's it to you?

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 12:02 pm**

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 10:48 am
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 10:38 am For the same reason you assumed Age was a bore that bores you to the point that you feel the need to tell him to fuck off. Why don't you just fuck off instead? problem solved.

You really are a silly one aren't you?
And what's it to you?

Showing you something you might not have thought about, that's what it is to me.

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 12:15 pm**

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 12:02 pm Showing you something you might not have thought about, that's what it is to me.

I have thought about it. Thanks.

Guess you jumped to a wrong conclusion then. Wonder why?

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 12:15 pm**

Right. Before we go off into another shouty match, here's a reminder of what this thread is about: https://willybouwman.blogspot.com

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 1:23 pm**

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 12:15 pm
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 12:02 pm Showing you something you might not have thought about, that's what it is to me.
I have thought about it. Thanks.

Actions speak louder than words.

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 12:15 pmGuess you jumped to a wrong conclusion then. Wonder why?

No conclusion was announced. I said you might not have thought about it not that you had.

.

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 1:41 pm**

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 1:23 pm No conclusion was announced. I said you might not have thought about it not that you had.

Perhaps not in words... but.....

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 1:23 pm Actions speak louder than words.

You had at least two hypotheses, did you not?

Hypothesis A. I have thought about it.
Hypothesis B. I haven't thought about it.

You concluded: Probability(B) > Probability(A) which is why you said what you said.
The ACTION of you saying "perhaps you hadn't thought about it" speaks louder than the words themselves.

You incorrectly inferred P(B) > P(A) when the correct hypothesis was, in fact A.
This is called a Type II error. A false negative.

So I ask you again: Guess you jumped to a wrong conclusion then. Wonder why?

Absence of evidence (for me having thought about it) is not evidence of absence of me having thought about it.

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 1:46 pm**

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 10:34 am
Age wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 10:11 am Is that a fact, or a story?
What's the difference?

Age wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 10:11 am You seem to NOT want solitude, as you keep replying and thus depriving me of same.
I never said I want solitude. Why did you assume that?

I NEVER said you wanted solitude, and I NEVER assumed you did want solitude.

I just expressed what APPEARED to me, which obviously could be WRONG. As I say, it is just my VIEW, which could be WRONG.

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 1:48 pm**

Age wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 1:46 pm I just expressed what APPEARED to me, which obviously could be WRONG. As I say, it is just my VIEW, which could be WRONG.

What is the difference between "wrong" and "not-wrong"?

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 1:48 pm**

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 1:41 pm
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 1:23 pm No conclusion was announced. I said you might not have thought about it not that you had.
Perhaps not in words... but.....

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 1:23 pm Actions speak louder than words.
You had at least two hypotheses, did you not?

Hypothesis A. I have thought about it.
Hypothesis B. I haven't thought about it.

You concluded: Probability(B) > Probability(A) which is why you said what you said.
The ACTION of you saying "perhaps you hadn't thought about it" speaks louder than the words themselves.

You incorrectly inferred P(B) > P(A) when the correct hypothesis was, in fact A.
This is called a Type II error. A false negative.

So I ask you again: Guess you jumped to a wrong conclusion then. Wonder why?

Absence of evidence (for me having thought about it) is not evidence of absence of me having thought about it.

You think too much.

Philosophy Now Forum

Einstein on the train

Re: Goodbye Age.

Re: Goodbye Age.

Re: Einstein on the train-Introduction

Re: Goodbye Age.

Re: Goodbye Age.

Re: Einstein on the train-Introduction

Re: Goodbye Age.

Re: Goodbye Age.

Re: Goodbye Age.

It's called Einstein on the train

Re: Hello Age.

Re: Hello Age.

Re: Goodbye Age.

Re: Goodbye Age.

Re: Hello Age.