aphilosophy
-
chaz wyman
- Posts: 5304
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm
Re: aphilosophy
Arising, I congratulate you for your patience and clarity.
But.. I can't help thinking that Typist thrives on the attention.
There is not doubt that he epitomises a confused and troubled person; one not suited to the aims and interests of many on the forum; the very definition of a troll.
An infinite number of typists, with an infinite number of typewriters; would, in an infinite amount of time produce a text that looks like this:"[lkasdf[lhNVMSJFJDJ[sosjruvjzksdf[ljzdv soisv sd soihvos d woi v w [oeih sodjbvkjsroiw ifjfgie we g ioasrkjhnbvbjawr ase dvisdifhsdfhs vsdfaphislsofpghrts da[d a pfhieoldihfi apjhildode a[hilsophyr a aa[=d aphislosphye a ds a spheilodthe then sospher s not sna qhooppsso na wha h shaarghgha shaieh ought ax cpha beh crumsbs somoreonf sos amorons filly diullr filly sshhmoromnrnr sai reldioufnsfreligious hfan ahf ededebunks bdediesndbede- dedbunk fhedih sishskdead bunkers djhdkfhsaaphilsoperjsjja ia reaknow what aiu asma talking about shnsdsasd skfohe yeash."
The question is when will he stop and read what other people write and understand it?
But.. I can't help thinking that Typist thrives on the attention.
There is not doubt that he epitomises a confused and troubled person; one not suited to the aims and interests of many on the forum; the very definition of a troll.
An infinite number of typists, with an infinite number of typewriters; would, in an infinite amount of time produce a text that looks like this:"[lkasdf[lhNVMSJFJDJ[sosjruvjzksdf[ljzdv soisv sd soihvos d woi v w [oeih sodjbvkjsroiw ifjfgie we g ioasrkjhnbvbjawr ase dvisdifhsdfhs vsdfaphislsofpghrts da[d a pfhieoldihfi apjhildode a[hilsophyr a aa[=d aphislosphye a ds a spheilodthe then sospher s not sna qhooppsso na wha h shaarghgha shaieh ought ax cpha beh crumsbs somoreonf sos amorons filly diullr filly sshhmoromnrnr sai reldioufnsfreligious hfan ahf ededebunks bdediesndbede- dedbunk fhedih sishskdead bunkers djhdkfhsaaphilsoperjsjja ia reaknow what aiu asma talking about shnsdsasd skfohe yeash."
The question is when will he stop and read what other people write and understand it?
Re: aphilosophy
If you reply to this post with a "Yes, but..." this will be evidence that you haven't yet seen the irrelevance of the intellectual part of aphilosophy, and still think you can get to aphilosophy through philosophy.
If you are interested in aphilosophy find a way, your way, to take a break from typing and thinking.
Everything else is just a way to put that exploration off.
If you are interested in aphilosophy find a way, your way, to take a break from typing and thinking.
Everything else is just a way to put that exploration off.
-
chaz wyman
- Posts: 5304
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm
Re: aphilosophy
If I didn't know you better I would think you needed a break from thinking. However there is very little evidence that you do any thinking at all.Typist wrote:If you reply to this post with a "Yes, but..." this will be evidence that you haven't yet seen the irrelevance of the intellectual part of aphilosophy, and still think you can get to aphilosophy through philosophy.
If you are interested in aphilosophy find a way, your way, to take a break from typing and thinking.
Everything else is just a way to put that exploration off.
But if it is such a good idea why don't you just leave the Forum and put your money where your mouth is?
Do us all a favour!
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: aphilosophy
You can't even see the irony in your reply. I give up, you are an gnu idiot!Typist wrote:If you reply to this post with a "Yes, but..." this will be evidence that you haven't yet seen the irrelevance of the intellectual part of aphilosophy, and still think you can get to aphilosophy through philosophy.
If you are interested in aphilosophy find a way, your way, to take a break from typing and thinking.
Everything else is just a way to put that exploration off.
Although I'll give you that you are an honest one and all you wish to do is type for your own ego and to beat your breast and to show your penis size.
Re: aphilosophy
Ok, this is good.You can't even see the irony in your reply. I give up, you are an gnu idiot!
My reply is full of irony, contradiction, bogus logic, faulty thinking, and I am a gnu idiot who is ripe for dismissal etc etc. aPhilosophy is a ridiculous pile of nonsense, and not worth a moment of your time. I agree with all this.
So, you claim you are giving up. I agree that this is a wise plan.
But is it really true. Are you really going to give up?
Or do you feel an overwhelmingly uncontrollable urge to hit the reply button, and say something, anything? Do you find it's simply beyond your ability to drop this subject and let me have the last word? Do you realize that as much as you'd like to give up on this topic, you are unable to let it go?
If you type one more word on this topic, one more word, you will reveal yourself to be a compulsive thinking addict, who wants to give up this topic, but can't. You will be demonstrating why you're so engaged in this discussion, you're in need of aphilosophy.
One more word on this topic.
Just one more word from you on the topic of aphilosophy, and you're admitting that you can't control your own brain.
You want to be the big challenge debunker guy? Ok Mr. Big Challenge Guy, here's my challenge to you.
I challenge you to never type one more word in reply to any of my posts.
Let's see if you can do it.
Or will you prove that you are a slave to your keyboard, and that you simply have no choice but to type replies to what I write?
We've arrived at put up or shut up time Arising.
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: aphilosophy
As if I'd give you the satisfaction of you posting your waffle unopposed, idiot!
It was not me who used the ignore button and then ignored using it.
I'll be putting my questions to your gnu arse every time you make a stupid statement and that'll be often given your record.
When I said "give-up" twat, it was that I give-up trying to give you the chance to prove that you had anything concrete to say.
Not once have you addressed one of the questions that anyone has put to you. Instead you parrot the same old gumph, just like your last post.
Its you who says that typing and thinking and talking is a waste, irrelevant, etc, but here you are again with the big 'I am' challenge in the hope that you can parrot your nonsense with impunity.
Well guess what! I like thinking and typing, I like questions and answers, although theres a shortage where you're concerned. I have no psychological hang-ups about thought and thinking, I have no need for your non-thought, because its exactly what it is. I like philosophy and guess where you are!? So not happening, as I like to feed the troll. It makes me happy.
Keep on squawking parrot.
p.s.
Although in the interests of the other members of the board I will attempt to keep schtum until your idiocy just becomes unbearable.
It was not me who used the ignore button and then ignored using it.
I'll be putting my questions to your gnu arse every time you make a stupid statement and that'll be often given your record.
When I said "give-up" twat, it was that I give-up trying to give you the chance to prove that you had anything concrete to say.
Not once have you addressed one of the questions that anyone has put to you. Instead you parrot the same old gumph, just like your last post.
Its you who says that typing and thinking and talking is a waste, irrelevant, etc, but here you are again with the big 'I am' challenge in the hope that you can parrot your nonsense with impunity.
Well guess what! I like thinking and typing, I like questions and answers, although theres a shortage where you're concerned. I have no psychological hang-ups about thought and thinking, I have no need for your non-thought, because its exactly what it is. I like philosophy and guess where you are!? So not happening, as I like to feed the troll. It makes me happy.
Keep on squawking parrot.
p.s.
Although in the interests of the other members of the board I will attempt to keep schtum until your idiocy just becomes unbearable.
-
chaz wyman
- Posts: 5304
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm
Re: aphilosophy
Typist wrote:Ok, this is good.You can't even see the irony in your reply. I give up, you are an gnu idiot!
My reply is full of irony, contradiction, bogus logic, faulty thinking, and I am a gnu idiot who is ripe for dismissal etc etc. aPhilosophy is a ridiculous pile of nonsense, and not worth a moment of your time. I agree with all this.
So, you claim you are giving up. I agree that this is a wise plan.
But is it really true. Are you really going to give up?
Dear sweetie, no one is ever going to give up on you. You are just toooooo easy to bait. We have so much fun with it.
You are like the geek in the playground that everyone sniggers at.
You are the priceless fool. You are just too much entertainment. Never give up - you are keeping us all so amused.
Or do you feel an overwhelmingly uncontrollable urge to hit the reply button, and say something, anything? Do you find it's simply beyond your ability to drop this subject and let me have the last word? Do you realize that as much as you'd like to give up on this topic, you are unable to let it go?
It's never gonna happen. Every post is going to be mercilessly attacked. Every forum needs a village idiot and you are he.
If you go then it would have to be someone else, and lets face it every the most ignorant is way better than you, so we'd have to use them as our aunt Sally and that would not be fair.
But you typie, you deserve everything you get. And what is really funny is that you brought it all on yourself.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
If you type one more word on this topic, one more word, you will reveal yourself to be a compulsive thinking addict, who wants to give up this topic, but can't. You will be demonstrating why you're so engaged in this discussion, you're in need of aphilosophy.
That is pure. It's amazing. What a wonder! You can't bring yourself to stop can you!!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
One more word on this topic.
Here's a word. SUCKER. typist is a sucker.
Just one more word from you on the topic of aphilosophy, and you're admitting that you can't control your own brain.
MY BRAIN HURTS!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIlKiRPSNGA
You want to be the big challenge debunker guy? Ok Mr. Big Challenge Guy, here's my challenge to you.
I challenge you to never type one more word in reply to any of my posts.
Let's see if you can do it.
ROTFFLMFHO!!!!
THis comes from the moron that banished me to the world of the ignored but can't resist sniping his childish bullshit on just about every fucking post I type.
Well get this - is anyone going to accept your childish challenge until you shut the fuck up and REALLY ignore us? I don't think so.
If we are pissing you off then so be it.
Or will you prove that you are a slave to your keyboard, and that you simply have no choice but to type replies to what I write?
I think we have proved that you can't take what you give out you little pussy.
We've arrived at put up or shut up time Arising.
Yeah - you can shut up!
Re: aphilosophy
That didn't take long.Arising_uk wrote:As if I'd give you the satisfaction of you posting your waffle unopposed, idiot!
Re: aphilosophy
Chaz, perhaps you could explain to us why we should listen to those who can't master the quote function?
Chaz, you have declared my posts to be utter nonsense etc. So Mr. Laser Logic, why are you still reading them?
What's logical about that?
Chaz, you have declared my posts to be utter nonsense etc. So Mr. Laser Logic, why are you still reading them?
What's logical about that?
Re: aphilosophy
YOU ARE THE GREAT DEBUNKER!!chaz wyman wrote:It's never gonna happen. Every post is going to be mercilessly attacked.
Where did I say I could? Please observe how you are so compulsively addicted to debunking you are now attempting to debunk claims that have never been made.That is pure. It's amazing. What a wonder! You can't bring yourself to stop can you!!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
The only difference between me, and you and Arising, is that I have the intellectual honesty to admit I can't stop, whereas you two are a couple of chicken shits, who are puffing yourselves up to hide your fear from yourself.
Want to debunk that? Ok, good!
Then prove it Mr. Big Man, stop typing, stop replying, prove me wrong. If you can. But you can't because...
I know that you can't stop replying to my posts, you know you that can't stop replying to my posts, and everybody reading this knows that you can't stop replying to my posts.
You are a hopeless prisoner inside your own mind, and too afraid to face it. This is the part of the very real human condition that aphilosophy attempts to address.
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: aphilosophy
How many times do I have to tell you? Your thought processing capacity is no reflection upon others.Typist wrote:That didn't take long.
Do you think you'll ever be applying your pet psychological theories to youself? As I note that this reply too did not take long.
The difference is that it has no implication for me as I don't hold to your theories, whereas I assume you do? Does this not bother you?
Last edited by Arising_uk on Wed Aug 24, 2011 1:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: aphilosophy
You can't stop, and with every new post, you are further proving my point.
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: aphilosophy
But I don't hold to your theory of others motivations?Typist wrote:... Where did I say I could? Please observe how you are so compulsively addicted to debunking you are now attempting to debunk claims that have never been made.
The only difference between me, and you and Arising, is that I have the intellectual honesty to admit I can't stop, whereas you two are a couple of chicken shits, who are puffing yourselves up to hide your fear from yourself.![]()
I also don't advocate an 'aphilosophy' that says I should not be replying nor do I say that the sign of an 'aphilosopher' is one who has learnt not to do such behavior, whereas you do? So what value this 'aphilosophy' that you advocate for others but appear incapable of doing oneself?
I also thought you said that the intellect is of no import and divisive but now you appear to say that it concerns honesty?
Re: aphilosophy
You can't stop, and with every new post, you are further proving my point.
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: aphilosophy
No, you are confirming that your belief system is immune to reality.Typist wrote:You can't stop, and with every new post, you are further proving my point.
But in philosophy you have proposed a double-blind and as a snake-oil salesman you should know this. Its the equivalent of "When did you stop beating your wife?".
The problem you have is you propose an 'aphilosophy' that says teaches you not to be doing this. So with your every word you are destroying your own position.
Now what I could point out is that you have a tendency to only answer those portions of a post that confirm your beliefs, and if anyone wished to confirm this they can re-check your posts and see it is a fact.