Philosophy Now Forum

Atla wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 8:50 am More importantly, what is a "real woman"? There are some females here who don't qualify.

Atla wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 8:50 am More importantly, what is a "real woman"? There are some females here who don't qualify.

Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 7:40 am

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Fri Apr 04, 2025 8:10 pm

Fairy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 04, 2025 8:01 pm
Okay.

So instead of climbing on your high horse and accusing Flannel Jebus of delivering a "ridiculous argument" way back on page 2 of this thread, you should probably have given it an extra mulling over because he's quite smart, the argument he presented was a valid criticism, and it would be useful for you to realise that.

I’m not terribly afraid of being ridiculous or systemically ridiculed by ridiculously ignorant folks like you. My god, next you’ll be trying to ban me from ever daring to think for myself ffs.

I wasn’t even thinking past the age bearing capacity for women to get pregnant at the time when I was simply agreeing with Trump’s point that seemed like a fairly reasonable definition of what is a woman. I understand posting this stuff triggers some people to become highly critical. Because how dare anyone express their opinions about anything. It’s just unacceptable that we can just say whatever we like without being ripped to shreds for even daring to open our mouths. I mean the tolerance could even reach such a level that intelligent people will be banned from ever thinking again so as not to offend the imbeciles.

It seemed ridiculous to me to take my agreement any further, by turning my agreement into a full blown argument about who’s going to be seen as right or wrong on the matter, as at the time I wasn’t going to change my mind one iota. I don’t understand why it had to turn into such a big ordeal, and why you just can’t accept my opinion and leave it at that, rather than leave it, it seemed like you just wanted to shame me into someone who is dense, dull, a psycho and all the other negativity you projected onto to me, even being so mean and spiteful as to drag Harbal into the conversation for fucks sake, what the hell is wrong with you?


And it’s also perfectly okay to make ridiculous definitions, I have no problem with the ridiculous nature of human reasoning. Especially when it involves personal opinions, assumptions, or beliefs.

I’m just not that hung up on perfecting what I can only make a personal interpretation of, due to my own unique mental capacity to understand my reality and of how I perceive it to be. And I’m sure others feel the same way about how they perceive their points of view.


Just as you thought the FJ rebuttal against my agreement was valid, and you took it upon yourself to okay and validate the FJ rebuttal….I okayed and validated Trump’s comment.Why can’t you just accept my agreement. And accept that I had no thoughts or intentions to take it any further. So I don’t need your validation or approval as to what I choose to agree with when I’m making my own mind up about what I agree with. I am the one who gets to decide what I want to agree with, not you, okay!

Atla wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 10:18 amIncorrect.

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 10:34 am

Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 7:40 am

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Fri Apr 04, 2025 8:10 pm
So instead of climbing on your high horse and accusing Flannel Jebus of delivering a "ridiculous argument" way back on page 2 of this thread, you should probably have given it an extra mulling over because he's quite smart, the argument he presented was a valid criticism, and it would be useful for you to realise that.

I’m not terribly afraid of being ridiculous or systemically ridiculed by ridiculously ignorant folks like you. My god, next you’ll be trying to ban me from ever daring to think for myself ffs.

I wasn’t even thinking past the age bearing capacity for women to get pregnant at the time when I was simply agreeing with Trump’s point that seemed like a fairly reasonable definition of what is a woman. I understand posting this stuff triggers some people to become highly critical. Because how dare anyone express their opinions about anything. It’s just unacceptable that we can just say whatever we like without being ripped to shreds for even daring to open our mouths. I mean the tolerance could even reach such a level that intelligent people will be banned from ever thinking again so as not to offend the imbeciles.

It seemed ridiculous to me to take my agreement any further, by turning my agreement into a full blown argument about who’s going to be seen as right or wrong on the matter, as at the time I wasn’t going to change my mind one iota. I don’t understand why it had to turn into such a big ordeal, and why you just can’t accept my opinion and leave it at that, rather than leave it, it seemed like you just wanted to shame me into someone who is dense, dull, a psycho and all the other negativity you projected onto to me, even being so mean and spiteful as to drag Harbal into the conversation for fucks sake, what the hell is wrong with you?


And it’s also perfectly okay to make ridiculous definitions, I have no problem with the ridiculous nature of human reasoning. Especially when it involves personal opinions, assumptions, or beliefs.

I’m just not that hung up on perfecting what I can only make a personal interpretation of, due to my own unique mental capacity to understand my reality and of how I perceive it to be. And I’m sure others feel the same way about how they perceive their points of view.


Just as you thought the FJ rebuttal against my agreement was valid, and you took it upon yourself to okay and validate the FJ rebuttal….I okayed and validated Trump’s comment.Why can’t you just accept my agreement. And accept that I had no thoughts or intentions to take it any further. So I don’t need your validation or approval as to what I choose to agree with when I’m making my own mind up about what I agree with. I am the one who gets to decide what I want to agree with, not you, okay!

So now you are back to holding the definition so that you can say other people are wrong? Or are you back to nobody being right and nobody being wrong? It's just a question of in which way you are disagreeing yourself.

You certainly do feel sorry for yourself no matter what though.

Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 11:35 am

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 10:34 am

Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 7:40 am

I’m not terribly afraid of being ridiculous or systemically ridiculed by ridiculously ignorant folks like you. My god, next you’ll be trying to ban me from ever daring to think for myself ffs.

I wasn’t even thinking past the age bearing capacity for women to get pregnant at the time when I was simply agreeing with Trump’s point that seemed like a fairly reasonable definition of what is a woman. I understand posting this stuff triggers some people to become highly critical. Because how dare anyone express their opinions about anything. It’s just unacceptable that we can just say whatever we like without being ripped to shreds for even daring to open our mouths. I mean the tolerance could even reach such a level that intelligent people will be banned from ever thinking again so as not to offend the imbeciles.

It seemed ridiculous to me to take my agreement any further, by turning my agreement into a full blown argument about who’s going to be seen as right or wrong on the matter, as at the time I wasn’t going to change my mind one iota. I don’t understand why it had to turn into such a big ordeal, and why you just can’t accept my opinion and leave it at that, rather than leave it, it seemed like you just wanted to shame me into someone who is dense, dull, a psycho and all the other negativity you projected onto to me, even being so mean and spiteful as to drag Harbal into the conversation for fucks sake, what the hell is wrong with you?


And it’s also perfectly okay to make ridiculous definitions, I have no problem with the ridiculous nature of human reasoning. Especially when it involves personal opinions, assumptions, or beliefs.

I’m just not that hung up on perfecting what I can only make a personal interpretation of, due to my own unique mental capacity to understand my reality and of how I perceive it to be. And I’m sure others feel the same way about how they perceive their points of view.


Just as you thought the FJ rebuttal against my agreement was valid, and you took it upon yourself to okay and validate the FJ rebuttal….I okayed and validated Trump’s comment.Why can’t you just accept my agreement. And accept that I had no thoughts or intentions to take it any further. So I don’t need your validation or approval as to what I choose to agree with when I’m making my own mind up about what I agree with. I am the one who gets to decide what I want to agree with, not you, okay!

So now you are back to holding the definition so that you can say other people are wrong? Or are you back to nobody being right and nobody being wrong? It's just a question of in which way you are disagreeing yourself.

You certainly do feel sorry for yourself no matter what though.

Dude, I don’t care whether my agreement is wrong or right. This entire thread topic has turned into is a semantic debacle. Gosh I should’ve known better than to create a thread like this.

Winning or losing arguments is not something on the top of my list of priorities when creating threads. I simply be myself, say stuff honestly in the moment. I simply agreed with Trump’s assessment when defining what is a woman. There’s nothing complicated about that. I’m not going to backpedal on my agreement. I don’t even care if my agreement was right, wrong, or whatnot.

Dude, if you want to be right, be right, I don’t give a shite, I’ll happily be delighted for you to be right. Life’s too short to care.

Gosh, now I’m even feeling sorry for myself just because a little big alpha egoistical man arguing for his entitled right to be right said so. I just can’t !!

Just be right then. It’s not difficult or complicated. Just own your right. If that’s what you want.

I couldn’t care less. My agreement still stands, what else can I say. FJ had a fantastic rebuttal on my agreement. It was valid and amazing, wow, I’m happy for him. You agreed with FJ, wow, I’m happy for you too. There, are we all satisfied now.

If not, then tough, it’s not going to create a massive shift in perception for me.Nothing has changed. I still agree with the comments made on the video I posted.

So I guess I’ll See you on the next thrilling instalment of this rather odd “what is a woman” according to a man episode…

It’s not like you are ever going to shut up about it, so do carry on in vain.

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 10:48 am

Atla wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 10:18 amIncorrect.

So tell us what make a woman 'unreal' then? Or a man for that matter?

promethean75 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 06, 2025 12:11 am No, that was her talking in her sleep about the guy she was dreaming about. You were just half asleep yourself and thought she was talking to you.

promethean75 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 06, 2025 3:18 am Oh well damn. I thought it was a clever sex joke or allusion to sex. You're constantly dropping them about. I gotta take back the star I gave you for that one, then.