Page 19 of 31

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 1:15 pm
by henry quirk
Age wrote: Sat Jul 20, 2024 8:00 am
Irrelevant.

What have I stolen, age? Please, tell me.

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 1:17 pm
by Age
Flannel Jesus wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 11:25 am
Age wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 11:16 am
henry quirk wrote: Sun Jul 21, 2024 2:36 pm

Human beings are people.
No they are not.

Obviously 'human beings' are human beings. Whereas, and just as obvious, 'people' are people.

There is a reason why you human beings have created and use different words.

'People' are not 'human beings', and, 'human beings' are not 'people'. Again, for obvious reasons.
What are the obvious reasons?
Finally.

I 'knew' there was 'a way' 'to draw out' the 'curiosity' that is laying dormant within you adult human beings.

1. Because they are 'different words'.

2. The word 'people' refers to the invisible thoughts and emotions, within human bodies, only. Whereas, the word 'human' refers to human bodies, only.

Flannel Jesus wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 11:25 am Which people aren't human beings?
Each and every one of you people.
Flannel Jesus wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 11:25 am Which human beings aren't people? And why?
Again, all. Because the 'different words' refer to 'different things', obviously.

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 1:17 pm
by Age
henry quirk wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 1:14 pm
Age wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 10:23 am But, you will not correct it either, right "henry quirk"?
Not for Harbal's benefit, no.
And, not for the readers here either, correct?

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 1:30 pm
by henry quirk
Age wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 11:06 amjust answer the actual clarifying question I ask you, and do it openly and honestly
An excellent idea!

Please, just answer the actual clarifying question I ask you, and do it openly and honestly...

What have I stolen?

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 1:32 pm
by henry quirk
Age wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 11:06 amBut you humans are animals, obviously.
We're partly biological, yes, but, no, we're not animals.

BTW: what have I stolen, age?

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 1:33 pm
by henry quirk
Age wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 11:16 amNo they are not.
Yes, we are.

One more thing: what have I stolen, age?

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 1:36 pm
by henry quirk
Age wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 1:17 pmAnd, not for the readers here either, correct?
Oh, if someone with a genuine interest asks, I'd give it a shot.

What have I stolen, age?

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2024 12:01 am
by Age
henry quirk wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 1:30 pm
Age wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 11:06 amjust answer the actual clarifying question I ask you, and do it openly and honestly
An excellent idea!

Please, just answer the actual clarifying question I ask you, and do it openly and honestly...

What have I stolen?
Have you forgotten what you have stolen?

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2024 12:03 am
by Age
henry quirk wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 1:32 pm
Age wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 11:06 amBut you humans are animals, obviously.
We're partly biological, yes, but, no, we're not animals.
How do you define the word 'animal'?

And, if you believe, absolutely that humans are not animals, then what 'category' do 'humans' fit into, exactly?
henry quirk wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 1:32 pm BTW: what have I stolen, age?

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2024 12:06 am
by Age
henry quirk wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 1:33 pm
Age wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 11:16 amNo they are not.
Yes, we are.
Obviously, this one does not yet know how to define words so that they all fit perfectly together to form one unified crystal clear picture of all-there-is. Or, as some would say, to create the GUTOE.
henry quirk wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 1:33 pm One more thing: what have I stolen, age?
Again, have you forgotten? Or, are you just in complete self-denial?

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2024 12:07 am
by henry quirk
Age wrote: Tue Jul 23, 2024 12:01 amHave you forgotten what you have stolen?
Not about what I do or don't remember. It's about your claim...
Age wrote: Fri Jul 19, 2024 5:13 amyou have stolen stuff in the past
....so, what have I stolen, age?

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2024 12:08 am
by Age
henry quirk wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 1:36 pm
Age wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 1:17 pmAnd, not for the readers here either, correct?
Oh, if someone with a genuine interest asks, I'd give it a shot.
What does someone have to do to prove, to you, that they have a so-called 'genuine interest'?
henry quirk wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 1:36 pm What have I stolen, age?
Are you, still, unaware?

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2024 12:09 am
by Age
henry quirk wrote: Tue Jul 23, 2024 12:07 am
Age wrote: Tue Jul 23, 2024 12:01 amHave you forgotten what you have stolen?
Not about what I do or don't remember. It's about your claim...
Age wrote: Fri Jul 19, 2024 5:13 amyou have stolen stuff in the past
....so, what have I stolen, age?
Do 'I' really need to inform 'you' of what 'you' have done, and/or not done?

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2024 12:09 am
by henry quirk
Age wrote: Tue Jul 23, 2024 12:03 amHow do you define the word 'animal'?
In context: nuthin' but meat.
And, if you believe, absolutely that humans are not animals, then what 'category' do 'humans' fit into, exactly?
Person.

What did I steal, age?

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2024 12:11 am
by henry quirk
Age wrote: Tue Jul 23, 2024 12:08 amWhat does someone have to do to prove, to you, that they have a so-called 'genuine interest'?
You? Nuthin', cuz you don't.

What have I stolen, age?