Re: Racism
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2023 1:10 pm
She's got a point, Scalpy.
But I fear you get intellectually bested by women quite often...?
But I fear you get intellectually bested by women quite often...?
How childish of you.Wizard22 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 1:04 pmAll this sounds like typical liberal projection to me.Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 11:50 amRacists like you only see criminals when you see a black person.
Racists like you tend not to give jobs out; buy things from; or provide collage places (though you yourself would never be in such a position of power).
Racist like you make black people use different bar, water fountains, and make them sit at the back of the bus.
Embrace your history.
Why are you such a Racist, Scalpy?
So, we can colour in your first premise there as red for false, Asian women are top of that heap by a wide margin, white men second, white women get joint 5th with everyone else after latino women in 3rd and black men in 4th.Wizard22 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 13, 2023 9:05 am Facts
White males and females are the highest desirability on average for miscegenation.
This is because of the prominence of Western Civilization in political & economic power.
Beauty standards revolve around Western (White) women.
Miscegenation is not generally practiced around the world, except in Cosmopolitan areas.
Miscegenation coincides directly with Liberalism/Zionism/Marxism (your worldview).
Miscegenation also coincides with pro-Immigration policies and Desegregation (Liberalism).
IQ and Intelligence have scientifically measured degrees of genetic heritability.
Genetic heritability reflects dating, and therefore mating-patterns.
The weekend? So not American then. Unsurprising. Americans ironically don't tend to present as cocky and arrogant--just LOUD. I'm guessing Australian. There aren't that many countries to choose from in that time zone.
I don't think so. A 'serial killer' is a particular kind of criminal. The term was first coined in the US for a particular kind of American murderer. Not every country has serial killers. I think we've had one here, but Australia has had many, and still all white.promethean75 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 1:50 pm in fact the number of serial killers in third world countries would actually far surpass the numbers in first world countries if we wanted to split hairs. that's to say there are more people killing numbers of people exceeding three and not at one time, in third world countries (or far less developed than western liberal pseudo-democrazys if not third world).
but i know what u meant. the mythological serial killer of modern society. the white guys. no it's totally crazy; somehow it just feels more perverse when a white guy does it. like when i read about a UK serial killer and hear and see him in an interview I'm just baffled. but if some indian or african guy does the same shit, I'm like meh.
there's a certain criteria that seems to exist for our conception of the serial killer in western societies. we want him to be extra intelligent or an imbecile, but not in between.
7sk4f1.jpg
Yes Ted I was getting to that relax please
we need him to have had a horrible upbringing or a perfect childhood (in the latter it's that anomaly that intrigues us; how did this happen). he has to represent and be symbolic of either the aristocratic hannibal lector Leopold and Loeb type above society or the middle class white man who is finally made crazy by the effects of life in western society. that's the point media always wants to drive home; see.... see what's happening to white men in amercia?! omg why do we have more serial killers?!
We had to do our Quid Pro Quo first. Debate is a give-and-take, not a one-way street.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 2:47 pmWhy are you avoiding all the questions your list raises?
According to this black woman, you're a "white supremacist" if you don't date and marry black women. Interesting. I bet you'll agree with her.According to the research presented in The Dating Divide, which includes interviews with online daters as well as an analysis of anonymized internal data provided by a mainstream U.S. dating site, Asian, Latino/a, and white straight men and gay women are all unwilling to message Black women on dating apps. Additionally, Asian, Latina, and white straight women all refute messages from Black men, while Asian, Latino, and white gay men are also unlikely to message Black men. Does this collective anti-Blackness simply come down to an unintentional, harmless preference or is it a product of modern-day digital sexual racism derived from historical white supremacist roots?
How do you account for this? Whites in the West have the highest in-group preference while Blacks have the highest out-group preference. It must be Racism, right dummy? What else could it possibly be?UC Berkeley researchers analyzed the racial preferences and online activity of people from the United States who subscribed between 2009 and 2010 to a major Internet dating service. In their profiles, the online daters stated a racial preference. Some said they preferred to date only within their race, others preferred someone outside their race, and yet others said they were open to dating someone of any race.
Researchers were then able to compare the online daters’ stated preferences with whom they actually contacted for a date, and they found profound differences between blacks and whites.
“Those who said they were indifferent to the race of a partner were most likely to be young, male and black,” said Gerald Mendelsohn, a UC Berkeley psychologist, professor of graduate studies and lead author of the study, which will soon be submitted for publication.
Overall, he said, “Whites more than blacks, women more than men and old more than young participants stated a preference for a partner of the same race,”
The reluctance of whites to contact blacks was true even for those who claimed they were indifferent to race. More than 80 percent of the whites contacted whites and fewer than 5 percent of them contacted blacks, a disparity that held for young as well as for older participants.
“Were they hypocritical? Alert to the realities of the social world? Striving for political correctness? Attempting an optimizing strategy of self-presentation? Our data do not permit us to choose among those alternatives,” the study authors wrote.
The study’s coauthors are Lindsay Shaw Taylor, a postdoctoral researcher at UC Berkeley; Andrew T. Fiore, a graduate of the UC Berkeley School of Information who is currently a visiting assistant professor at Michigan State University and Coye Cheshire, an assistant professor in the School of Information.
An estimated one in five Americans has used an online dating service such as eHarmony or Match.com, and a growing number of urbanites are finding romance via Facebook and other social networking sites. The percentage of couples who have met online is now nearly equal to that of pairs who met through friends or family, according to the researchers.
If I were bested so easily by a woman, then I'd ignore her too...
And this is your utopia, Scalpy:Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 2:18 pmHere's Wizard's parents.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMzjCCPPWhg
https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2015/ ... er-groups/FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 2:47 pmSo, we can colour in your first premise there as red for false, Asian women are top of that heap by a wide margin, white men second, white women get joint 5th with everyone else after latino women in 3rd and black men in 4th.
Prominence of western culture is a bit of a nothingburger. This thing about beauty standards and white women is contingent so there's no point even bothering to address whether it can be a natural truth. We'll make them purple for pointlessness.
Your next plausible candidate for a factual claim would be that "Miscegenation is not generally practiced around the world, except in Cosmopolitan areas." It doesn't really make any sense though, metropolitan areas are the ones where racial mixing is expected to occur, no? What was the point of this claim please?
It seems to matter for this Jewish miscegenation conspiracy theory that we are about to have to wade into...
Oh darn, Schitzy, wrong again..."Researchers have long documented the existence of a racial hierarchy within the U.S. dating world, with White women and men the most preferred partners, Blacks the least preferred, and Asians and Latinos falling somewhere in between."
Celeste Vaughan Curington – University of Massachusetts-Amherst
Celeste Vaughan Curington is a doctoral student in the Sociology Department at the University of Massachusetts- Amherst. Her research interests include race and ethnicity, labor migration, and qualitative and quantitative methods. She is currently exploring African gendered migration and subsequent entrance into care economies in Portugal. Her other projects center on U.S. multiracial identity formation and the locational attainment of interracial households in Los Angeles County. Her recent work on multiracial identity has appeared in the journals American Sociological Review and Sociology of Race and Ethnicity.
Is that so?? Well, you're wrong! And it's hard not to be arrogant and cocky while manhandling British "intellectuals"!vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 2:49 pmThe weekend? So not American then. Unsurprising. Americans ironically don't tend to present as cocky and arrogant--just LOUD. I'm guessing Australian. There aren't that many countries to choose from in that time zone.