Philosophy Now Forum

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Tue Dec 13, 2022 6:40 am

Age wrote: ↑Tue Dec 13, 2022 5:18 am

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Tue Dec 13, 2022 4:33 am

Bullshit. Not knowing everything there is to know about something doesn't automatically equate to 'knowing nothing' you fucking moron.

WHO are you replying here to EXACTLY?

I NEVER even 'thought' ANY thing like this, let alone 'mentioned' NOR 'said' absolutely ANY thing like this.

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Tue Dec 13, 2022 4:33 am Obviously some people have a greater level of understanding and the means to increase their understanding than others, after having spent years studying it.

OF COURSE SOME DO.

'you', human beings, can so-call 'study' absolutely ANY thing, for as long as 'you' like, like, for example, the Universe, Itself, BUT when the so-called "experts" of the 'study' can NOT even agree on what some words ACTUALLY MEAN or REFER TO, EXACTLY, then 'spending years' so-called 'studying' could end up have being for absolutely nothing more than just a complete 'waste of time'. That is; IF the so-called "experts" EVER get around on DECIDING and AGREEING UPON on what 'time', itself, ACTUALLY IS, EXACTLY, for example.

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Tue Dec 13, 2022 4:33 am Why do you have this obsessive need to argue about EVERYTHING??

LOL

I was NOT 'arguing' ANY thing.

I JUST asked 'you' an OPEN and SIMPLE question in regards HOW, or WHY, would 'you' expect to 'get your head around' some 'thing', when the so-called "experts" have NOT YET even WORKED OUT HOW to just DEFINE that 'thing', let alone got 'their heads around that 'thing'.

A question ASKED is NOT necessarily 'an argument' AT ALL.

AND, my next two comments were NOT 'arguments' AT ALL, either, and, in fact, were JUST Facts that could NOT be REFUTED.

Now, I could say, 'Why do you have this obsessive need to blow EVERYTHING out of proportion??'

But, that would be just as ABSURD and as UNTRUTHFUL as what 'you' asked me here and CLAIMED was true.

So I will NOT. But, I WILL ask, WHY do 'you' MISCONSTRUE and TAKE OUT OF CONTEXT SO MUCH as 'you' DO in what I SAY and WRITE here?

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Tue Dec 13, 2022 4:33 am My comment was to her, not you, so kindly butt your big, fat, hairy, contrary snout out of it unless you have something constructive and intelligent to say.

My question WAS TO 'you', "vegetariantaxidermy", personally. And, my two comments WERE to 'you', and "others".

So, kindly refrain from TELLING 'me' what TO DO or what NOT TO DO.

If 'you' were, and still ARE, just completely and utterly INCAPABLE to just answer a Truly OPEN and SIMPLE question, asked and posed for CLARITY, alone, then so be it.

But I WILL ask questions and make comments in a PUBLIC FORUM if, and when, I CHOOSE TO DO SO. I WILL make AS MANY as I like AS WELL.

Is this UNDERSTOOD by 'you'?

And, JUST MAYBE if 'you' read what I ACTUALLY WROTE, AGAIN, BEFORE 'you' JUMP to making ANY ASSUMPTIONS AT ALL, based on the very first three letters I USED, then JUST MAYBE 'you' WILL SEE 'things' completely DIFFERENTLY, this time.

I suppose you are an early bot. Obsolete now and too moronic and obvious to be of any use.

Age wrote: ↑Tue Dec 13, 2022 9:37 am If you say so, but this still does NOT detract away from the fact that 'you 'will' NEVER 'get 'your' head around all of this' while the so-called "experts" can NOT even agree on the terms and names used to explain ALL of 'this'.

If you say so, but this still does NOT detract away from the fact that you will NEVER get your head around all of this while the so-called "experts" can NOT even agree on the terms and names used to explain ALL of this.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Tue Dec 13, 2022 11:23 pm

Age wrote: ↑Tue Dec 13, 2022 9:37 am If you say so, but this still does NOT detract away from the fact that 'you 'will' NEVER 'get 'your' head around all of this' while the so-called "experts" can NOT even agree on the terms and names used to explain ALL of 'this'.

You're getting sloppy with your nonsensical and useless quoting.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Tue Dec 13, 2022 11:23 pm Let's count the single quotes, starting with the one before 'you':

1, 'you, which is unclosed immediately -- unusual for you, interesting choice.
2,3, 'will'
4, 'get, another rare quote that isn't immediately closed.
5,6, 'your'
7, this' -- this quote is closing either the quote that started with 'you, or the quote that started with 'get

An odd number; you've left an unclosed quote. Even if you hadn't have flubbed it, I don't know that they would have added any meaning to what you're saying.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Tue Dec 13, 2022 11:23 pm I mean really, just look at this:

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Tue Dec 13, 2022 11:23 pm

If you say so, but this still does NOT detract away from the fact that you will NEVER get your head around all of this while the so-called "experts" can NOT even agree on the terms and names used to explain ALL of this.

What's missing in this that is added by all the quotes?

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Tue Dec 13, 2022 11:23 pm Ya goof.

Age wrote: ↑Wed Dec 14, 2022 5:32 amWHAT IS MISSING IS MY ACTUAL MEANING.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Wed Dec 14, 2022 8:00 pm

Age wrote: ↑Wed Dec 14, 2022 5:32 amWHAT IS MISSING IS MY ACTUAL MEANING.

That's not true. There's not an ounce of meaning missing from my quoteless rendition of your words.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Wed Dec 14, 2022 8:00 pm If there is, articulate it please. I'm real curious what meaning was missed.

Then, out of frustration, the thinking mind cannot help saying “I don’t know” and finally quits.

Lacewing wrote: ↑Sun Dec 11, 2022 5:36 pmProbably for most people, this would sound terrifying and depressing. And the language of non-dualism often sounds like babble. I prefer the slightly gentler approach of 'Forget everything you've been told about what life is and how it works'.

Lacewing wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 7:07 pm Everything is energy...continually changing and consciously manifesting into countless forms.

The many stories that we human beings make up based on human limitation and fear, which we try to apply to the 'infinite all-that-is', make no sense! There can be peace in considering that 'god/divine' energy is the energy within and throughout all which we can never be separated from. We are part of countless manifestations of energy: conscious, flowing, circulating.

We are not limited to (nor prisoners of) the dark and dense world and stories created by men, based on divisiveness and fear and separation from a god. We can manifest light, as countless beings do regardless of their spiritual affiliations or none at all. It's a natural potential of energy. If we put our intention toward being more conscious, rather than defending our identity and stories, how/what might we manifest?

Here's a short little video (one of many) that describes how all is energy, consciously manifesting in countless ways, which human beings assign different names to.
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=g ... &FORM=VIRE

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Wed Dec 14, 2022 10:19 pm What are you talking about?

Walker wrote: ↑Thu Dec 15, 2022 11:44 pm Has the source of dattaswami's manifest energy been decided?
Considered?

- If the source is All, or God
- and because everyone has access to All, or God
- why does not everyone write like an encyclopedia?

Rational ethicist wrote: ↑Thu Dec 29, 2022 2:50 pm Could it be ... energy?

Is dattaswami plugged-in?

Walker wrote: ↑Sat Dec 24, 2022 5:59 am They say this cute little fox can catch mice when he faces North because he tunes into earth energy.

Speculation or fact?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2SoGHFM18I

Lacewing wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 7:07 pm Everything is energy...continually changing and consciously manifesting into countless forms.