Page 19 of 46

Re: Trump Derangement Syndrome

Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2022 4:55 pm
by commonsense
Immanuel Can wrote: Tue Sep 13, 2022 4:18 pm
…Socialism and Democrat administrations are utterly hopeless with economies, militaries, health care initiatives, agriculture, infrastructure, education, and everything else the public looks to them to do.
An honest question, IC: why do you say this? Maybe there’s background I’m unaware of. Maybe there are specifics I don’t understand. I realize that Democrats are poor stewards of the military, but the other areas I thought are their strengths.

Educate me, please.

Re: Trump Derangement Syndrome

Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2022 5:07 pm
by Immanuel Can
commonsense wrote: Tue Sep 13, 2022 4:55 pm
Immanuel Can wrote: Tue Sep 13, 2022 4:18 pm
…Socialism and Democrat administrations are utterly hopeless with economies, militaries, health care initiatives, agriculture, infrastructure, education, and everything else the public looks to them to do.
An honest question, IC: why do you say this?
An honest answer, commonsense.

Because it's so obviously true. Socialism is so focused on the goal of "redistribution," (formerly called "covetousness" in the Big 10) that it takes no reckoning at all of the fact that wealth can be generated. Socialism doesn't allow for free enterprise, so it doesn't allow for profit or wealth-creation...so its people do not create new wealth, and the government becomes focused on nothing but redistribution of dwindling funds...which, because the government itself doesn't produce the money...they spend with reckless abandon.

You see this, for instance, in China. Unti "Red Capitalism" came along as a strategy, the Chinese were grinding their way into poverty and misery even greater than they are inflicting on their own minority populations today. But once they opened the "free trade" zones, suddenly the national economy was not only viable again, but thriving and taking on the world. What they know, but will never admit, is that free markets produce entrepreneurial ventures, invention, industry, economic discipline and so on, and so produce new wealth that Socialist economics can never produce.

I could give you many more such examples.

I'm intimately familiar with public education. And I can tell you that the sheer waste in a government-run educational progam is absolutely breathtaking. From outside, one could not possibly imagine it, or imagine what money is being spent on, or what teachers are spending their time on. Not only that, but not being reliant themselves for funds on running efficiently or making dollars count, the education administrators allow millions to leech off in every foolish project and every direction. Meanwhile, standards continually fall; because all Socialist educators think about is serving their "revolution." They don't care if kids are unable to read, write and think -- because those skills would only make them successful within the status quo, and make the status quo itself more productive -- so they focus instead on inducing "critical consciousness" (their word) which means Socialist-construed grievances against everything, so the status quo may be smashed. And believe me, if that ends up hurting your kids, they don't care. They're Socialists. "The Movement" is everything, to them. Individuals mean nothing.

So there are some specifics.

Re: Trump Derangement Syndrome

Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2022 7:05 pm
by commonsense
Immanuel Can wrote: Tue Sep 13, 2022 4:18 pm By being a person of questionable integrity himself, Trump may well have played into their game. No doubt, he has. But it was never about that, because they don't care about the evils done by Democrats. They use moral language...and a lot of it...but for them, it was never about morality at all, nor about women, nor even about racism, sexism, homophobia, transism...nor about the whole country. It was about themselves, their ambitions, projects and values. And it was about power...by any means necessary.
As you said, Trump is the bogeyman for the Democrats to exploit.

I don’t think that Reagan filled that role. I doubt that John McCain would have filled the role so readily had he ever been president.

There must be something to it involving Trump’s morals or personality.

Re: Trump Derangement Syndrome

Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2022 7:08 pm
by commonsense
Immanuel Can wrote: Tue Sep 13, 2022 5:07 pm
commonsense wrote: Tue Sep 13, 2022 4:55 pm
Immanuel Can wrote: Tue Sep 13, 2022 4:18 pm
…Socialism and Democrat administrations are utterly hopeless with economies, militaries, health care initiatives, agriculture, infrastructure, education, and everything else the public looks to them to do.
An honest question, IC: why do you say this?
An honest answer, commonsense.

Because it's so obviously true. Socialism is so focused on the goal of "redistribution," (formerly called "covetousness" in the Big 10) that it takes no reckoning at all of the fact that wealth can be generated. Socialism doesn't allow for free enterprise, so it doesn't allow for profit or wealth-creation...so its people do not create new wealth, and the government becomes focused on nothing but redistribution of dwindling funds...which, because the government itself doesn't produce the money...they spend with reckless abandon.

You see this, for instance, in China. Unti "Red Capitalism" came along as a strategy, the Chinese were grinding their way into poverty and misery even greater than they are inflicting on their own minority populations today. But once they opened the "free trade" zones, suddenly the national economy was not only viable again, but thriving and taking on the world. What they know, but will never admit, is that free markets produce entrepreneurial ventures, invention, industry, economic discipline and so on, and so produce new wealth that Socialist economics can never produce.

I could give you many more such examples.

I'm intimately familiar with public education. And I can tell you that the sheer waste in a government-run educational progam is absolutely breathtaking. From outside, one could not possibly imagine it, or imagine what money is being spent on, or what teachers are spending their time on. Not only that, but not being reliant themselves for funds on running efficiently or making dollars count, the education administrators allow millions to leech off in every foolish project and every direction. Meanwhile, standards continually fall; because all Socialist educators think about is serving their "revolution." They don't care if kids are unable to read, write and think -- because those skills would only make them successful within the status quo, and make the status quo itself more productive -- so they focus instead on inducing "critical consciousness" (their word) which means Socialist-construed grievances against everything, so the status quo may be smashed. And believe me, if that ends up hurting your kids, they don't care. They're Socialists. "The Movement" is everything, to them. Individuals mean nothing.

So there are some specifics.
Thanks, IC.

Re: Trump Derangement Syndrome

Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2022 9:20 pm
by Immanuel Can
commonsense wrote: Tue Sep 13, 2022 7:05 pm
Immanuel Can wrote: Tue Sep 13, 2022 4:18 pm By being a person of questionable integrity himself, Trump may well have played into their game. No doubt, he has. But it was never about that, because they don't care about the evils done by Democrats. They use moral language...and a lot of it...but for them, it was never about morality at all, nor about women, nor even about racism, sexism, homophobia, transism...nor about the whole country. It was about themselves, their ambitions, projects and values. And it was about power...by any means necessary.
As you said, Trump is the bogeyman for the Democrats to exploit.

I don’t think that Reagan filled that role. I doubt that John McCain would have filled the role so readily had he ever been president.
It's hard to say. Of course, that's a "what if." I wonder if the Dems would have gone easier on McCain, or would have been just as extreme...I suppose it would depend on what they thought they could get out of doing that.
There must be something to it involving Trump’s morals or personality.
Well, as I say, I've never been inclined to defend Trump. But I am inclined to point out the hypocrisy of those who may pillory him for speaking crudely, but have no concern about Clinton or Biden doing much worse. That simply does not make sense.

So we musts conclude: either their concern is the morality of candidates, or that is not their real concern. They don't seem to have any concern about Clinton or Biden, therefore they have no actual moral concern about Trump; so what they have instead is a strategem, a ruse used to get themselves ahead, rather than some sort of high-minded defense of purity, truth or justice. And we ought not to be fooled by so transparent a ruse, nor fail to mark the extremity of their hypocrisy. We ought to mock, then dismiss them with a wave, actually. But we do not.

Let me just add this: the moral state of our major politicians today is absolutely deplorable. We could look back on the last five presidents in the States, and say that, for sure. But America's not unique in this. We could look at Germany, England, Canada, Australia, France...and we would see them electing morally-reprehensible, ideologically-driven and personally corrupt people. We would also see people lining up for parties, not for leaders of integrity, and excusing the ineptitude and corruption of their elected officials as if it were unimportant.

Perhaps they think, so what if a woman hates men or dissolves her country's borders in the name of Wokeness, or gets her own troops killed and hides evidence? So what if a man locks everybody up and then runs dinner parties during an alleged pandemic? So what if he covers for his coke-head, prostitute-patronizing son and takes handouts from foreign governments, even when we have the evidence in hand? So what if he wears blackface and fires all the competent people in his cabinet, and shields corrupt multinationals against prosecution? So what if a man chases skirt, or speaks like a trucker. So what if he is even a serial predator?

We don't care, it seems: so long as the party in power is ours, we'll ask nothing from the moral character of our leaders.

And maybe we get the leaders we deserve for having such low standards.

Re: Trump Derangement Syndrome

Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2022 9:21 pm
by Immanuel Can
commonsense wrote: Tue Sep 13, 2022 7:08 pm Thanks, IC.
You're welcome. I'd say "my pleasure," except there's no pleasure in it. :(

Re: Trump Derangement Syndrome

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 10:26 am
by tillingborn
Immanuel Can wrote: Tue Sep 13, 2022 3:53 pm
commonsense wrote: Tue Sep 13, 2022 3:47 pmYour question about imbalanced venom has been answered by several here.
Ummm...nope.

Nobody's given a good reason why frat boys are worse than serial predators. But if you want to try, go ahead.
You say that you judge character "based on the evidence available to me, what I think of each". The theme of this thread can be characterised as some people being very selective about the news they avail themselves of. You say
Immanuel Can wrote: Tue Sep 13, 2022 3:15 pmAll I have heard, up to this point, about Trump in that regard is that he made frat-boy talk.
If that is still true, you are wilfully ignorant since both mickthinks and myself have provided sources where you can learn about the allegations against Trump. If you do not wish to educate yourself in this matter, you are manifestly applying different standards to Trump than to Democrats about whom you know a great deal, despite having said with regard to getting American news:
Immanuel Can wrote: Tue Sep 13, 2022 4:36 amI don't.
Wherever you are getting your news, you are not getting the whole picture. Therefore your opinion that Donald Trump's claim that he is apt to "grab them by the pussy" is 'frat boy talk', rather than a confession of the accusations of "rape, sexual assault, and sexual harassment, including non-consensual kissing or groping, by at least 25 women since the 1970s". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Tr ... llegations is based on incomplete information.
Here you are
Immanuel Can wrote: Mon Sep 12, 2022 5:27 pmperplexed that Biden has not sued her, nor has she been prosecuted for slander. Surely that's what a public figure would ordinarily do, if only to keep his "good name" clear. But Biden's done neither.
Nor has Donald Trump:
"In October 2016, Trump publicly vowed to sue all the women who have made allegations of sexual misconduct against him, as well as The New York Times for publishing the allegations, but he has yet to follow through with any legal action." ibid
It would surely be 'imbalanced' not to draw the same conclusion for Trump as Biden.

Re: Trump Derangement Syndrome

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 12:29 pm
by Immanuel Can
tillingborn wrote: Wed Sep 14, 2022 10:26 am You say
Immanuel Can wrote: Tue Sep 13, 2022 3:15 pmAll I have heard, up to this point, about Trump in that regard is that he made frat-boy talk.
If that is still true,
It's not. But it's also not terribly relevant anymore. By any account, Trump's indiscretions (which you have elected to dismiss as unproven anyway) are manifestly not worse than the proved allegations against Clinton, or Biden. After all, Trump may be a cad or even a pervert, but nobody's alleging serial rape, the taking of bribes, or senile dementia...and we have actual confirmation for those. Clinton's confessed, and between the laptop and the evidence of our own eyes, we know they're not ahead of Trump in any category.

A wicked lot, it seems. But you can't recommend Clinton and Biden as morally superior. That boat won't float. So there's no hope in that direction for explaining away the Left's purported hatred for Trump, given their ardent support of both Clinton and Biden.

Another explanation must be true, other than that Trump's somehow much worse than earlier Repubs or present Dems. That much is glaringly obvious.

Re: Trump Derangement Syndrome

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 12:55 pm
by tillingborn
Immanuel Can wrote: Wed Sep 14, 2022 12:29 pm
tillingborn wrote: Wed Sep 14, 2022 10:26 am You say
Immanuel Can wrote: Tue Sep 13, 2022 3:15 pmAll I have heard, up to this point, about Trump in that regard is that he made frat-boy talk.
If that is still true,
It's not. But it's also not terribly relevant anymore. By any account, Trump's indiscretions (which you have elected to dismiss as unproven anyway) are manifestly not worse than the proved allegations against Clinton, or Biden. After all, Trump may be a cad or even a pervert, but nobody's alleging serial rape, the taking of bribes, or senile dementia...and we have actual confirmation for those. Clinton's confessed
You cannot help yourself, can you? Nobody has confessed to "serial rape". I don't see any difference between Trump Derangement Syndrome and your quickness to believe the worst of people on flimsy evidence. Of course I dismiss allegations of Trump's alleged indiscretions as unproven, because other than his potty mouth and payment to porn stars, that is what they are; but so are allegations of serial rape. You are judging people by different standards. QED.

Re: Trump Derangement Syndrome

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 1:04 pm
by Immanuel Can
tillingborn wrote: Wed Sep 14, 2022 12:55 pm Nobody has confessed to "serial rape".
No, of course they won't. Who wants to go to jail? What the rich and powerful do is bully, browbeat and pay off their accusers. But you saw Billy boy stare into the camera, and say to the entire American electorate, with total conviction, "Read my lips; I did not have sexual relations with that woman." And he was lying through his teeth. We know that for sure, now; and but for the famous dress, he'd have gotten away with that cover-up too.

And you trust him to tell the truth? :shock:

But add it up. Flowers, Jones, Lewinski, Broaddrick, Millwee, James, Wellstone, etc., plus 17 known trips with Epstein...do that math.

If you have reservations about Trump, what have you got with regard to Clinton? :shock:

It's interesting you choose to get all ridiculous and hypocritically high-horse about allegations being unreasonable to consider in selecting a candidate. You believe all the things said about Trump, apparently, which are premised on less evidence, and won't even see the evidence of your eyes, regarding Biden.

TDS...classic.

Re: Trump Derangement Syndrome

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 1:30 pm
by tillingborn
Immanuel Can wrote: Wed Sep 14, 2022 1:04 pm
tillingborn wrote: Wed Sep 14, 2022 12:55 pm Nobody has confessed to "serial rape".
No, of course they won't. Who wants to go to jail? What the rich and powerful do is bully, browbeat and pay off their accusers. But you saw Billy boy stare into the camera, and say to the entire American electorate, with total conviction, "Read my lips; I did not have sexual relations with that woman." And he was lying through his teeth. We know that for sure, now; and but for the famous dress, he'd have gotten away with that cover-up too.

And you trust him to tell the truth? :shock:
Now you are judging me. Where have I said I trust Bill Clinton to tell the truth? Yes I did see him lie, and it was contemptuous.
Immanuel Can wrote: Wed Sep 14, 2022 1:04 pmBut add it up. Flowers, Jones, Lewinski, Broaddrick, Millwee, James, Wellstone, etc., plus 17 known trips to Epstein Island...do that math.

If you have reservations about Trump, what have you got with regard to Clinton? :shock:

And don't get all ridiculous and hypocritically high-horse about allegations. You believe all the things said about Trump
You are just making things up. Where have I said I believe any such thing?
Immanuel Can wrote: Wed Sep 14, 2022 1:04 pm, which are premised on less evidence, and won't even see the evidence of your eyes, regarding Biden.

TDS...classic.
And there you have it. Everything I have said about you has been backed up by your own words; you find other human beings guilty based only on your opinion of them. I can't imagine how awful it must be to have that level of bile. I feel sorry for you.

Re: Trump Derangement Syndrome

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 1:44 pm
by Immanuel Can
tillingborn wrote: Wed Sep 14, 2022 1:30 pm Now you are judging me.
You judge yourself. If it's immoral to do what Trump is accused of doing, it's immoral for Biden and Clinton. And if it's immoral to criticize somebody for things that never went to court, then you have no grounds to criticize Trump.

It was you who made those claims, and you who judge yourself. You don't need my help.

Re: Trump Derangement Syndrome

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 2:23 pm
by tillingborn
Immanuel Can wrote: Wed Sep 14, 2022 1:44 pmYou judge yourself. If it's immoral to do what Trump is accused of doing, it's immoral for Biden and Clinton.
Of course it is.
Immanuel Can wrote: Wed Sep 14, 2022 1:44 pmAnd if it's immoral to criticize somebody for things that never went to court, then you have no grounds to criticize Trump.
I have not criticised Trump; not even for his words nor payment to Stormy Daniels.
Immanuel Can wrote: Wed Sep 14, 2022 1:44 pmIt was you who made those claims, and you who judge yourself. You don't need my help.
What claims are you talking about? You backed yourself into a corner and now you're spitting out nonsense. Let me remind you of what my position has been throughout this exchange:
tillingborn wrote: Mon Sep 12, 2022 4:15 pmBoth Trump and Biden have been accused of sexual assault. Neither have been convicted. On what grounds do you find one guilty and the other innocent?
tillingborn wrote: Mon Sep 12, 2022 5:12 pmI have only said that Donald Trump has been accused of sexual assault. That Bill Clinton is guilty of sexual misconduct is a matter of public record.
tillingborn wrote: Mon Sep 12, 2022 7:07 pmIt is demonstrably true that Donald Trump has been accused of sexual assault. I don't remember where I first became aware of any of them, but malicious or otherwise, Donald Trump has faced accusations "by at least 25 women since the 1970s".
tillingborn wrote: Tue Sep 13, 2022 2:58 pmYes, we all make judgements about people's character, but it is something else to call a man a rapist before he has been convicted.
tillingborn wrote: Tue Sep 13, 2022 2:58 pmNowhere have I excused "Democrats who have done worse" than Trump.
tillingborn wrote: Wed Sep 14, 2022 12:55 pmOf course I dismiss allegations of Trump's alleged indiscretions as unproven, because other than his potty mouth and payment to porn stars, that is what they are; but so are allegations of serial rape.
Does any of that look familiar to you? What have I said that justifies your diagnosis of TDS?

Re: Trump Derangement Syndrome

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 2:34 pm
by Immanuel Can
tillingborn wrote: Wed Sep 14, 2022 2:23 pm I have not criticised Trump
I beg your pardon, then: I have misunderstood. I thought you were indicting him for speaking foul language and for a variety of other offences you listed earlier, and which others have accused him of doing.

You are now content that Trump is as good as anyone?

I suspect that's not the case, but you're free to assert that, if you wish.

But now I am confused by this quotation:
tillingborn wrote: Mon Sep 12, 2022 7:07 pmIt is demonstrably true that Donald Trump has been accused of sexual assault. I don't remember where I first became aware of any of them, but malicious or otherwise, Donald Trump has faced accusations "by at least 25 women since the 1970s".
I'm sorry -- are you accusing him or not? Or are you merely, for some reason, listing allegations you regard as totally false?

You're quite confusing sometimes. It's almost like you're two people: one is a moralizing and high-minded believer in strict due process, and the other is a person quite willing to accuse people based on things not run though due process at all.

I wonder which one I'm going to talk to next...

Re: Trump Derangement Syndrome

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 2:59 pm
by tillingborn
Immanuel Can wrote: Wed Sep 14, 2022 2:34 pmI am confused by this quotation:
tillingborn wrote: Mon Sep 12, 2022 7:07 pmIt is demonstrably true that Donald Trump has been accused of sexual assault. I don't remember where I first became aware of any of them, but malicious or otherwise, Donald Trump has faced accusations "by at least 25 women since the 1970s".
I'm sorry -- are you accusing him or not? Or are you merely, for some reason, listing allegations you regard as totally false?
It is not me who has accused Donald Trump of sexual assault and rather than regard the allegations as totally false, I simply haven't seen enough evidence to make an informed judgement.
Immanuel Can wrote: Wed Sep 14, 2022 2:34 pmYou're quite confusing sometimes. It's almost like you're two people: one is a moralizing and high-minded believer in strict due process, and the other is a person quite willing to accuse people based on things not run though due process at all.
You keep going back to it, but again I have not accused Trump of anything. If you continue to believe that I have, you will continue to be confused.