Someone, everyone, please take this seriously.

[Dontaskme]

Ok I understand what you mean...so he's left breadcrumbs right...and not the whole loaf..right?

Did he ever imply he has provided the whole loaf?

Actually he did. He said if you watched the two videos you would get it, but if you didn't get it after watching the two videos, then you didn't want to get it. Imagine if people believed that.

Well, maybe he did, I don't know...but that makes no difference, some people will get it instantly in just two videos, if it's meant to be got..if it's not meant to be got in two videos, then that's just what's meant to be.


I was fully self-realised at the age of 5....long before I'd even read a book, or watched a video. Only because that was what was meant to happen for me here...some people never undertand it no matter how long they have been trying, if it's meant to happen it will, and not until it's meant to be understood.

[Iwannaplato]

He called someone swine.

No, the messages in the video is pointing to a ''thought free awareness'' prior to a label/concept known.


If the shoe fits then wear it, but no one is forcing you to wear it, unless you want to. No one is forcing you to clothe your nakedness with veil obscuring your real self.

I asked questions elsewhere about his ideas. Here I was responding to him calling someone swine.
He called someone swine.

[Dontaskme]

He called someone swine.

No, the messages in the video is pointing to a ''thought free awareness'' prior to a label/concept known.


If the shoe fits then wear it, but no one is forcing you to wear it, unless you want to. No one is forcing you to clothe your nakedness with veil obscuring your real self.

I asked questions elsewhere about his ideas. Here I was responding to him calling someone swine.
He called someone swine.

It's a metaphor for the mind. So what?

[Iwannaplato]

He called someone swine.

No, the messages in the video is pointing to a ''thought free awareness'' prior to a label/concept known.


If the shoe fits then wear it, but no one is forcing you to wear it, unless you want to. No one is forcing you to clothe your nakedness with veil obscuring your real self.

He labelled someone swine, not me. I think you have an issue with him.

[Iwannaplato]

It's a metaphor for the mind. So what?

I said what I said. so what?
Why are you upset at me?

[Sculptor]

Pearls before swine.

Here is what every three year old excels in but you have forgotten.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5lzt42Tb20
It's only twenty minute.
If you still do not get it try this..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_EQDtpYSNM

[Dontaskme]

He called someone swine.

No, the messages in the video is pointing to a ''thought free awareness'' prior to a label/concept known.


If the shoe fits then wear it, but no one is forcing you to wear it, unless you want to. No one is forcing you to clothe your nakedness with veil obscuring your real self.

He labelled someone swine, not me. I think you have an issue with him.

Nope, he did not.

He wrote.. ''pearls before swine''

It's a metaphor. Roy never once mentioned 'a someone' is a swine, as you have proposed.

[Dontaskme]

He called someone swine.

No, the messages in the video is pointing to a ''thought free awareness'' prior to a label/concept known.


If the shoe fits then wear it, but no one is forcing you to wear it, unless you want to. No one is forcing you to clothe your nakedness with veil obscuring your real self.

He labelled someone swine, not me. I think you have an issue with him.

I think you have an issue with otherness.

[Dontaskme]

It's a metaphor for the mind. So what?

I said what I said. so what?
Why are you upset at me?

I'm not upset. I'm just responding with my own interpretations of what is being discussed, why would I be upset about that?

[Dontaskme]

He labelled someone swine, not me. I think you have an issue with him.

Where has Roy labeled ''a someone'' a swine?


Please repost the actual evidence of that claim?

[Iwannaplato]

No, the messages in the video is pointing to a ''thought free awareness'' prior to a label/concept known.


If the shoe fits then wear it, but no one is forcing you to wear it, unless you want to. No one is forcing you to clothe your nakedness with veil obscuring your real self.

He labelled someone swine, not me. I think you have an issue with him.

Nope, he did not.

He wrote.. ''pearls before swine''

It's a metaphor. Roy never once mentioned 'a someone' is a swine, as you have proposed.

you interpret him with great charity. Please to that with me.

[Iwannaplato]

No, the messages in the video is pointing to a ''thought free awareness'' prior to a label/concept known.


If the shoe fits then wear it, but no one is forcing you to wear it, unless you want to. No one is forcing you to clothe your nakedness with veil obscuring your real self.

He labelled someone swine, not me. I think you have an issue with him.

I think you have an issue with otherness.

And I experience you are condescending again. Now you are telling me my problems.

[Dontaskme]

He labelled someone swine, not me. I think you have an issue with him.

I think you have an issue with otherness.

And I experience you are condescending again. Now you are telling me my problems.

pot kettle

You said you think I have an issue with Roy

I have no such issue.

[Dontaskme]

you interpret him with great charity. Please to that with me.

Until you can explain where has Roy labeled ''a someone'' a swine? and repost the actual evidence of that claim?

I have no idea what you are referring to when you say I interpret him with great charity. I mean what the heck are you talking about, please explain?

I must be slow or something, I don't know, maybe I'm missing something, but I'm sure you will release the blockage.

[Iwannaplato]

I think you have an issue with otherness.

And I experience you are condescending again. Now you are telling me my problems.

pot kettle

You said you think I have an issue with Roy

I have no such issue.

I know you don't have an issue with Roy. That was the point.