Philosophy Now Forum

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:01 am**

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 6:59 am
Age wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 12:59 am Do you think this is one of those "gotcha" moments, which you have so been desperately LOOKING FOR?

Maybe it is, or maybe just because I do NOT like to ASSUME any thing I LOOK FOR the actual and real Truth by asking clarifying questions. If the "other" is Truly OPEN and Honest, then that is when I have access to, and obtain, the Truth, OBVIOUSLY.

Where you ASSUMING some thing different regarding 'having access to the Truth'?
Fuck off, Age

Fair enough, "logic"?

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 6:59 amNobody ASSUMED anything other than the fact that you are an idiot.
You ASSUMED that we ASSUMED something else.

Did I? And what was 'that', I "supposedly" ASSUMED?

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 6:59 amBy refusing to answer any clarifying questions posed to you, YOU have demonstrated that you are neither OPEN nor HONEST.

I have clearly stated that my answer is probably the same as yours is. If you still can NOT understand that, then my answer is the exact same as yours was.

Are you able to understand my answer now?

If no, then what exactly is it that you do NOT understand?

By the way does your statement work for ALL or just for some?

Remember you still have NOT answered my clarifying questions posed to you ABOUT WHAT YOU ACTUALLY WRITE, AND STATE.

Whereas, the so called "clarifying question" you posed to me was just a ridiculous mathematical question, which still has NOTHING to do with whether an infinite Universe could expand or not.

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:03 am**

Age wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:01 am I have clearly stated that my answer is probably the same as yours is. If you still can NOT understand that, then my answer is the exact same as yours was.

That is a lot of words to convey zero bits of information.

Your answer is probably the same as mine.
Your answer is probably not the same as mine.

50/50.

Shall we flip a coin?

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:04 am**

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:03 am
Age wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:01 am I have clearly stated that my answer is probably the same as yours is. If you still can NOT understand that, then my answer is the exact same as yours was.
Your answer is probably the same as mine.
Your answer is probably not the same as mine.

50/50.

Shall we flip a coin?

Did you NOT read what I wrote? I did NOT say what you wrote here.

I said my answer IS the exact same as yours WAS.

You really do misunderstand my writings quite frequently. This maybe because you do NOT read, and/or do NOT SEE, the actual words I use, or maybe you JUMP IN and respond BEFORE you real ALL of what I wrote, and that could be the very reason WHY you ASSUME so many WRONG things about what I ACTUALLY SAY?

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:08 am**

Age wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:04 am
Logik wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:03 am
Age wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:01 am I have clearly stated that my answer is probably the same as yours is. If you still can NOT understand that, then my answer is the exact same as yours was.
Your answer is probably the same as mine.
Your answer is probably not the same as mine.

50/50.

Shall we flip a coin?

So. You ASSUMED that you know what my answer is.

Did you ASSUME that my answer is: ∞ + 1 > 1
OR
Did you ASSUME that my answer is: ∞ + 1 = 1

For the record. I am still assuming you are an idiot. Till you make a choice.

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:34 am**

I've just put Age on my ignore list. Well, I call it a list, but Age is the only person(?) so shudderingly dull and pestilential to qualify. Well done everyone else.

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:36 am**

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:08 am
Age wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:04 am
Logik wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:03 am
Your answer is probably the same as mine.
Your answer is probably not the same as mine.

50/50.

Shall we flip a coin?

So. You ASSUMED that you know what my answer is.

ONCE AGAIN, you have NOT read the actual words that I wrote. And you are ONCE AGAIN completely and UTTERLY WRONG. The ACTUAL AND REAL Truth IS I KNOW what your answer WAS, which is what I WROTE.

I do NOT assume at all what your answer is. I have even CLEARLY STATED this FACT PREVIOUSLY. I even use SOME words in capitals so that you can SEE what I am ACTUALLY MEANING in what I write. But you STILL MISS ALL of THIS.

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:08 amDid you ASSUME that my answer is: ∞ + 1 > 1
OR
Did you ASSUME that my answer is: ∞ + 1 = 1

I KNOW what your answer WAS.

I have PREVIOUSLY even explained the very reason WHY I wrote my answer is PROBABLY what your answer IS.

WHEN, and IF, you EVER start reading the ACTUAL words that I write, then you MAY begin to start SEEING the actual and real Truth of things, ALSO.

Furthermore, you go on and on and on TRYING TO deflect away from the very FACT that when it was written: An infinite universe can't get any bigger, it's already infinite, and you wrote: What you are describing is a BOUNDED, not an infinite universe. in response. And then when I asked you the clarifying question: How is saying 'infinite Universe' describing a BOUNDED universe? you have so far been TOTALLY INCAPABLE of clarifying this for us. Why do you continually say things that you are TOTALLY INCAPABLE of backing up with clarifying answers and/or explanations?

When we START to LOOK AT where and when this all began we can SEE 'what is actually going on here' now.

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:36 am**

uwot wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:34 am I've just put Age on my ignore list. Well, I call it a list, but Age is the only person(?) so shudderingly dull and pestilential to qualify. Well done everyone else.

Slippery slope.

Soon it will be "Get off my lawn!"

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:38 am**

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:03 am
Age wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:01 am I have clearly stated that my answer is probably the same as yours is. If you still can NOT understand that, then my answer is the exact same as yours was.
That is a lot of words to convey zero bits of information.

That might be because you do NOT understand the ACTUAL information being given.

From your replies so far to this post of mine you have SHOWN you do NOT understand.

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:39 am**

Age wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:36 am
Logik wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:08 am
Age wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:04 am
So. You ASSUMED that you know what my answer is.
ONCE AGAIN, you have NOT read the actual words that I wrote. And you are ONCE AGAIN completely and UTTERLY WRONG. The ACTUAL AND REAL Truth IS I KNOW what your answer WAS, which is what I WROTE.

I do NOT assume at all what your answer is. I have even CLEARLY STATED this FACT PREVIOUSLY. I even use SOME words in capitals so that you can SEE what I am ACTUALLY MEANING in what I write. But you STILL MISS ALL of THIS.

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:08 amDid you ASSUME that my answer is: ∞ + 1 > 1
OR
Did you ASSUME that my answer is: ∞ + 1 = 1
I KNOW what your answer WAS.

I have PREVIOUSLY even explained the very reason WHY I wrote my answer is PROBABLY what your answer IS.

WHEN, and IF, you EVER start reading the ACTUAL words that I write, then you MAY begin to start SEEING the actual and real Truth of things, ALSO.

Furthermore, you go on and on and on TRYING TO deflect away from the very FACT that when it was written: An infinite universe can't get any bigger, it's already infinite, and you wrote: What you are describing is a BOUNDED, not an infinite universe. in response. And then when I asked you the clarifying question: How is saying 'infinite Universe' describing a BOUNDED universe? you have so far been TOTALLY INCAPABLE of clarifying this for us. Why do you continually say things that you are TOTALLY INCAPABLE of backing up with clarifying answers and/or explanations?

When we START to LOOK AT where and when this all began we can SEE 'what is actually going on here' now.

Age, why do you refuse to answer clarifying questions?

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:40 am**

uwot wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:34 am I've just put Age on my ignore list. Well, I call it a list, but Age is the only person(?) so shudderingly dull and pestilential to qualify. Well done everyone else.

Most people usually do ignore me when I POINT OUT the Truth to them in regards to what they do NOT like to LOOK AT and/or SEE.

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:40 am**

Age wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:38 am That might be because you do NOT understand the ACTUAL information being given.

From your replies so far to this post of mine you have SHOWN you do NOT understand.

Well, I don't know. I am the computer scientist here. Information is kinda my field.

Your words contain none.

But I am curious, what is Age's understanding of the word "understand"?

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:42 am**

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:39 am
Age wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:36 am
Logik wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:08 am

So. You ASSUMED that you know what my answer is.
ONCE AGAIN, you have NOT read the actual words that I wrote. And you are ONCE AGAIN completely and UTTERLY WRONG. The ACTUAL AND REAL Truth IS I KNOW what your answer WAS, which is what I WROTE.

I do NOT assume at all what your answer is. I have even CLEARLY STATED this FACT PREVIOUSLY. I even use SOME words in capitals so that you can SEE what I am ACTUALLY MEANING in what I write. But you STILL MISS ALL of THIS.

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:08 amDid you ASSUME that my answer is: ∞ + 1 > 1
OR
Did you ASSUME that my answer is: ∞ + 1 = 1
I KNOW what your answer WAS.

I have PREVIOUSLY even explained the very reason WHY I wrote my answer is PROBABLY what your answer IS.

WHEN, and IF, you EVER start reading the ACTUAL words that I write, then you MAY begin to start SEEING the actual and real Truth of things, ALSO.

Furthermore, you go on and on and on TRYING TO deflect away from the very FACT that when it was written: An infinite universe can't get any bigger, it's already infinite, and you wrote: What you are describing is a BOUNDED, not an infinite universe. in response. And then when I asked you the clarifying question: How is saying 'infinite Universe' describing a BOUNDED universe? you have so far been TOTALLY INCAPABLE of clarifying this for us. Why do you continually say things that you are TOTALLY INCAPABLE of backing up with clarifying answers and/or explanations?

When we START to LOOK AT where and when this all began we can SEE 'what is actually going on here' now.
Age, why do you refuse to answer clarifying questions?

How many questions is there?

And, what are they EXACTLY?

I have ALREADY answered the one question that you keep insisting I answer.

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:49 am**

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:40 am
Age wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:38 am That might be because you do NOT understand the ACTUAL information being given.

From your replies so far to this post of mine you have SHOWN you do NOT understand.
Well, I don't know. I am the computer scientist here. Information is kinda my field.

'I' am the "computer scientist" here.

LOL

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:40 amYour words contain none.

If that is all of what a so called "computer scientist" can see, then that is what it is.

To you, my words contain NO information. Yet a self-labelled "computer scientist" keeps responding to NO information.

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:40 amBut I am curious, what is Age's understanding of the word "understand"?

WHY does a self-reporting "computer scientist" say that the term 'infinite Universe' is describing a BOUNDED universe?

Some might say that that is a totally illogical thing to say, especially for some one with such credentials as a "computer scientist".

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:50 am**

Age wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:40 am Most people usually do ignore me when I POINT OUT the Truth to them in regards to what they do NOT like to LOOK AT and/or SEE.

No. Most people ignore you because you are a bore.

A bore is someone who deprives you of solitude without providing you with company. --Oscar Wilde

Posted: **Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:54 am**

Age wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:49 am WHY does a self-reporting "computer scientist" say that the term 'infinite Universe' is describing a BOUNDED universe?

Some might say that that is a totally illogical thing to say, especially for some one with such credentials as a "computer scientist".

"SOME" are not here to say anything. Only Age is here, saying things.

Age should choose an answer.

A. ∞ + 1 = ∞
B. ∞ + 1 > ∞

Till then. Age can fuck off

Philosophy Now Forum

Einstein on the train

Re: Einstein on the train-Introduction

Re: Einstein on the train-Introduction

Re: Einstein on the train-Introduction

Re: Einstein on the train-Introduction

Goodbye Age.

Re: Einstein on the train-Introduction

Re: Goodbye Age.

Re: Einstein on the train-Introduction

Re: Einstein on the train-Introduction

Re: Goodbye Age.

Re: Einstein on the train-Introduction

Re: Einstein on the train-Introduction

Re: Einstein on the train-Introduction

Re: Goodbye Age.

Re: Einstein on the train-Introduction