Re: Iceland wants to ban Internet porn
Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 4:44 pm
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/

Pop Quiz: What are the two major differences between homegrown's and Bill Wiltrack's videos?Bill Wiltrack wrote:...
That is one of the reasons that I appreciated your appearance and your use of video.

bobevenson wrote:Although people have different views on pornography, one thing is absolutely clear, it is not the function of government to stick its oppressive nose into it.
Only an idiot adds 2 and 2 and gets 5. You are a lazy shite that wants the world to handle your responsibilities, because you're either too stupid or lethargic. How ones child ends up is the PARENTS fault and NOT the WORLDS. God help your children, Oh that's right you don't have a god, no wonder you have your head up your arse. You don't want to live by the laws of a loving GOD just a greedy GOD.chaz wyman wrote:It's pointless arguing with you when you make moronic comments like you do.bobevenson wrote:The only proper function of government is social integration, like a traffic cop keeping people from running over each other, unlike your view of the government running over the people!chaz wyman wrote:In your view, does the government have any function at all?
Now take a look at the vid I linked and answer my question.

I think you live in a world of delusion.Bill Wiltrack wrote:I think I define my philosophical positions, possibly often in too much depth.
Shame you don't empathize with the women on this forum.
I use other peoples GIFs, which works well for me. This practice forces me to move out of my self. I am forced to feel a reaching; an empathy towards others in my posts.
Nah! Thats just you avoiding having to think about your thoughts.When you think about it, from a distance, our thoughts our views aren't really ours. Not really us.
It thinks. It sees.
It already is on social networks like wastebook and meTube, fun it might be but I doubt such a hard of thought approach will catch on on philosophy forums, as those who visit these like to think and communicate with words as they have more finesse.I do like the making & use of personal videos here on the Philosophy Now Forums. I think this, in some form, will be the future of posts upon this and many other forums.
Arising_uk wrote:I think you live in a world of delusion.Bill Wiltrack wrote:I think I define my philosophical positions, possibly often in too much depth.Shame you don't empathize with the women on this forum.
I use other peoples GIFs, which works well for me. This practice forces me to move out of my self. I am forced to feel a reaching; an empathy towards others in my posts.
Good question! I'll assume you meant it as a question, because I'm not sure that you know, in fact, that this is the case, as follows:
Hey Bill has any woman here on PNF spoke to you directly, of their feelings, thoughts, or attitudes in such a way, that you identified intellectually or experienced them vicariously? As surely individual feelings, thoughts, and attitudes are to be assessed on a case by case basis, as they are not necessarily universal, but rather relative.
Nah! Thats just you avoiding having to think about your thoughts.When you think about it, from a distance, our thoughts our views aren't really ours. Not really us.
It thinks. It sees.
It already is on social networks like wastebook and meTube, fun it might be but I doubt such a hard of thought approach will catch on on philosophy forums, as those who visit these like to think and communicate with words as they have more finesse.I do like the making & use of personal videos here on the Philosophy Now Forums. I think this, in some form, will be the future of posts upon this and many other forums.