For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Not quite! With respect to her bitter adversarial wording, directed at me.chaz wyman wrote:Arising_uk wrote:AS,
Why bother discussing Nietzsche with someone who has an opinion about something they've not actually read? Especially when they re-parrot nonsense about Hitler being the only one who understood him.
The voice of wisdom
I'm sure Gerson has cured thousands of people who THINK they have cancer. But that is not as hard as curing people who actually have it.SpheresOfBalance wrote: But first forget the belief that I shall not listen because it's you, and instead understand that I shall certainly listen because it's you, and I ask this question most seriously, do not look for anything but face value.
If one believes they have cancer, and fears going to the doctor, because they don't trust them, because it's substandard, because it's almost free and they want to employ the Gerson Therapy, I recently purchased Charlotte Gerson's book, "Healing the Gerson Way" is it advisable to exercise or conserve ones strength? I'm beginning to believe (denial) that your answer, I'm in dire need of, so in all seriousness, what do you suggest? For fear, as I mentioned above, I've thus far neglected to get a colonoscopy, which is the area in question, and now I have what seems to be a growth on a testis, and ejaculate volume has substantially decreased, so I'm afraid the entire area may be compromised.[/color]
I assure you I'm serious, if you wonder why I'm talking to you about it, It's because I'm a hermit of sorts and have lived alone for 2.5 years, I have no real friends, I usually only talk on the phone, usually daily with my wife and with you people here since Sept of 2011, other than that the only contact with people I have is when I go to the grocery store or barber. And while you and I argue quite a bit, if there's one thing i believe I know about you, it's that you are honest, as to your beliefs. But you haven't answered my question, which is: "Is it more advisable to routinely exercise or take it easy and conserve energy?"chaz wyman wrote:I'm sure Gerson has cured thousands of people who THINK they have cancer. But that is not as hard as curing people who actually have it.SpheresOfBalance wrote: But first forget the belief that I shall not listen because it's you, and instead understand that I shall certainly listen because it's you, and I ask this question most seriously, do not look for anything but face value.
If one believes they have cancer, and fears going to the doctor, because they don't trust them, because it's substandard, because it's almost free and they want to employ the Gerson Therapy, I recently purchased Charlotte Gerson's book, "Healing the Gerson Way" is it advisable to exercise or conserve ones strength? I'm beginning to believe (denial) that your answer, I'm in dire need of, so in all seriousness, what do you suggest? For fear, as I mentioned above, I've thus far neglected to get a colonoscopy, which is the area in question, and now I have what seems to be a growth on a testis, and ejaculate volume has substantially decreased, so I'm afraid the entire area may be compromised.[/color]
If you are serious and have a growth on your nut - then see a bloody doctor.
If you want to die slowly of prostate, testicle, or colon cancer then take the gentle Gerson treatment.
Not only am I more astute than BobEee, but apparently I'm more astute than you. So then, how could I possibly care for you? If you can't answer that, then that my dear, is in fact the difference between us.artisticsolution wrote:Arising_uk wrote:AS,
Why bother discussing Nietzsche with someone who has an opinion about something they've not actually read? Especially when they re-parrot nonsense about Hitler being the only one who understood him.I hear what you are saying...but all I can liken it to is how you waste your breath talking to Bob. Maybe I am hoping for an understanding no matter how minute?
When you say "her" you mean AS? As she is definitely a she.SpheresOfBalance wrote:Not quite! With respect to her bitter adversarial wording, directed at me.
No, YOU!!! You are either a "She" physically or psychologically, take your pick! Can you say closet queen?Arising_uk wrote:When you say "her" you mean AS? As she is definitely a she.SpheresOfBalance wrote:Not quite! With respect to her bitter adversarial wording, directed at me.
I can, can you say paranoid misogynist, 'a she ...psychologically'.SpheresOfBalance wrote:No, YOU!!! You are either a "She" physically or psychologically, take your pick! Can you say closet queen?
Arising UK, or more appropriately, Descending (U)nwittingly (K)nowledgeless, It doesn't matter who you're talking to, when you refer to me, you circular reference of confusion filled with dictionary fear, fool; keep your lips off my person, and go about your deluded way!Arising_uk wrote:I can, can you say paranoid misogynist, 'a she ...psychologically'.SpheresOfBalance wrote:No, YOU!!! You are either a "She" physically or psychologically, take your pick! Can you say closet queen?
But I was talking to AS you egotistical loon, 'Spheres of Balance' my arse!
A predictable response.SpheresOfBalance wrote:I assure you I'm serious, if you wonder why I'm talking to you about it, It's because I'm a hermit of sorts and have lived alone for 2.5 years, I have no real friends, I usually only talk on the phone, usually daily with my wife and with you people here since Sept of 2011, other than that the only contact with people I have is when I go to the grocery store or barber. And while you and I argue quite a bit, if there's one thing i believe I know about you, it's that you are honest, as to your beliefs. But you haven't answered my question, which is: "Is it more advisable to routinely exercise or take it easy and conserve energy?"chaz wyman wrote:I'm sure Gerson has cured thousands of people who THINK they have cancer. But that is not as hard as curing people who actually have it.SpheresOfBalance wrote: But first forget the belief that I shall not listen because it's you, and instead understand that I shall certainly listen because it's you, and I ask this question most seriously, do not look for anything but face value.
If one believes they have cancer, and fears going to the doctor, because they don't trust them, because it's substandard, because it's almost free and they want to employ the Gerson Therapy, I recently purchased Charlotte Gerson's book, "Healing the Gerson Way" is it advisable to exercise or conserve ones strength? I'm beginning to believe (denial) that your answer, I'm in dire need of, so in all seriousness, what do you suggest? For fear, as I mentioned above, I've thus far neglected to get a colonoscopy, which is the area in question, and now I have what seems to be a growth on a testis, and ejaculate volume has substantially decreased, so I'm afraid the entire area may be compromised.[/color]
If you are serious and have a growth on your nut - then see a bloody doctor.
If you want to die slowly of prostate, testicle, or colon cancer then take the gentle Gerson treatment.
As far as Gerson Therapy goes, apparently you know absolutely nothing about it. But that's OK because I do!
SpheresOfBalance wrote: But first forget the belief that I shall not listen because it's you, and instead understand that I shall certainly listen because it's you, and I ask this question most seriously, do not look for anything but face value.
If one believes they have cancer, and fears going to the doctor, because they don't trust them, because it's substandard, because it's almost free and they want to employ the Gerson Therapy, I recently purchased Charlotte Gerson's book, "Healing the Gerson Way" is it advisable to exercise or conserve ones strength? I'm beginning to believe (denial) that your answer, I'm in dire need of, so in all seriousness, what do you suggest? For fear, as I mentioned above, I've thus far neglected to get a colonoscopy, which is the area in question, and now I have what seems to be a growth on a testis, and ejaculate volume has substantially decreased, so I'm afraid the entire area may be compromised.[/color]
Look, maybe you and I have been enemies for far to long I don't know, but I'm not against you just because it's you, on this particular subject, for sure.chaz wyman wrote:A predictable response.SpheresOfBalance wrote:I assure you I'm serious, if you wonder why I'm talking to you about it, It's because I'm a hermit of sorts and have lived alone for 2.5 years, I have no real friends, I usually only talk on the phone, usually daily with my wife and with you people here since Sept of 2011, other than that the only contact with people I have is when I go to the grocery store or barber. And while you and I argue quite a bit, if there's one thing i believe I know about you, it's that you are honest, as to your beliefs. But you haven't answered my question, which is: "Is it more advisable to routinely exercise or take it easy and conserve energy?"chaz wyman wrote:I'm sure Gerson has cured thousands of people who THINK they have cancer. But that is not as hard as curing people who actually have it.
If you are serious and have a growth on your nut - then see a bloody doctor.
If you want to die slowly of prostate, testicle, or colon cancer then take the gentle Gerson treatment.
As far as Gerson Therapy goes, apparently you know absolutely nothing about it. But that's OK because I do!
You being a loner is not a surprise to me. You are in danger of building your own world a loosing a sense of proportion.
A book won't cure you if you have cancer, and it won't tell you if you have cancer in the fist place. So get off your fat butt and see a fucking doctor. If you want to be an idiot and follow some moronic QUACK then that is up to you. But you are better off knowing whether or not you have cancer.
As for your question; ""Is it more advisable to routinely exercise or take it easy and conserve energy?" - read your dumb book, because any advice I give you will be rejected - another symptom of a loner.
My advice on cancer and exercise - cancers don't give a rat's arse about exercise one way or the other - they grow and grow until you die.
Do you mean like a guy that goes to the top of a mountain, and stays for like 10 years, and becomes an overman? Or like the one that writes of it? Or maybe it was all about opium.chaz wyman wrote:A predictable response.
You being a loner is not a surprise to me. You are in danger of building your own world a loosing a sense of proportion.
SpheresOfBalance wrote:Do you mean like a guy that goes to the top of a mountain, and stays for like 10 years,chaz wyman wrote:A predictable response.
You being a loner is not a surprise to me. You are in danger of building your own world a loosing a sense of proportion.
No I don't.
and becomes an overman? Or like the one that writes of it? Or maybe it was all about opium.
Do you take opium?
Taking drugs alone can be pretty sad. I have always considered drug taking to be a social activity.
Look I'm a very compassionate person, and I feel for him, with respect to his pretty much, lifelong sicklyness, and that he died at just 55.
Your compassion is utterly mis-placed. Nietzsche would have scorned you for such a feeling. N's philosophy is to take suffering on the chin, and we are measured by the degree to which we are able to suck it up.
chaz wyman wrote:SpheresOfBalance wrote:Do you mean like a guy that goes to the top of a mountain, and stays for like 10 years,chaz wyman wrote:A predictable response.
You being a loner is not a surprise to me. You are in danger of building your own world a loosing a sense of proportion.
No I don't.
I thought you had more sense than to be a man of double standards, as those types are definitely fools. Both N during his writing of, and his alter ego, Zarathustra were secluded and were not in danger of loosing perspective, yet I am? How do you know I'm not an overman, and you're simply a towns folk with deaf ears, as they were unaware? Oh, I know this won't get past your ego, so take it rhetorically.
and becomes an overman? Or like the one that writes of it? Or maybe it was all about opium.
Do you take opium?
No, N did! I thought you were a history buff...
Taking drugs alone can be pretty sad. I have always considered drug taking to be a social activity.
Then you should travel back in time and tell your buddy N, because he did. I haven't been taking any drugs other than for Hypertension, for quite some time, not to say that I won't at some time in the future, just not currently.
Look I'm a very compassionate person, and I feel for him, with respect to his pretty much, lifelong sicklyness, and that he died at just 55.
Your compassion is utterly mis-placed. Nietzsche would have scorned you for such a feeling. N's philosophy is to take suffering on the chin, and we are measured by the degree to which we are able to suck it up.
There you go channeling dead people again, thus speaking for them, as if you possibly could!
You know I'm really surprised that a man with your amount of, 'supposed', education would believe in such mysticism. I guess you're just not a man of science.
SpheresOfBalance wrote:chaz wyman wrote: Do you take opium?[/color]
No, N did!
Dah obviously! Most intellectual Victorians did. Drug prohibition is basically a 20thC phenomenon.
I thought you were a history buff...