Page 18 of 18
Re: The Neural Basis of NonDuality
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 1:27 pm
by Atla
TimeSeeker wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 1:25 pm
Atla wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 1:24 pm
TimeSeeker wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 1:21 pm
BECAUSE it fits the intensive and extensive definitions I am applying the law of identity and concluding that "aiming to minimise communication" is THE SAME AS as a "goal".
Therefore. By deduction - philosophers who attempt to minimise communication have a goal.
By the law of excluded middle philosophers who do not have a goal do not optimise to to minimise communication.
You also said that philosophy has no goals.
This is a contradiction!
You have pissed on the very thing you claim to embrace. Classical logic!
No, it doesn't fit the definition of goal. You honestly fail to comprehend even the simplest English words.
Philosophy itself doesn't really have a goal. SOME philosophers make it their dedicated goal to improve communication. Some don't, they just improve it the same way you use your legs to walk to the store. Some don't even attempt to improve it.
Honestly this isn't about logic, you need a therapist.
So there is an authority on “philosophy itself”?
Can we ask them if philosophy has a goal?
“This isn’t about logic” he said. Using logic.
Logic is language. Dumbass.
Language is language. Logic is logic. get a fucking grip already.
Re: The Neural Basis of NonDuality
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 1:35 pm
by TimeSeeker
Atla wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 1:27 pm
TimeSeeker wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 1:25 pm
Atla wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 1:24 pm
No, it doesn't fit the definition of goal. You honestly fail to comprehend even the simplest English words.
Philosophy itself doesn't really have a goal. SOME philosophers make it their dedicated goal to improve communication. Some don't, they just improve it the same way you use your legs to walk to the store. Some don't even attempt to improve it.
Honestly this isn't about logic, you need a therapist.
So there is an authority on “philosophy itself”?
Can we ask them if philosophy has a goal?
“This isn’t about logic” he said. Using logic.
Logic is language. Dumbass.
Language is language. Logic is logic. get a fucking grip already.
Logic comes from the Greek word 'λογική'. Logos. Originally meaning "the word" or "what is spoken". Even Wikipedia says so:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic
It can be traced back at least 2000 years: Ἐν ἀρχῇ ἦν ὁ Λόγος, καὶ ὁ Λόγος ἦν πρὸς τὸν Θεόν, καὶ Θεὸς ἦν ὁ Λόγος.
The fact that you've compartmentalised them is just more evidence for your dualistic mind.
Re: The Neural Basis of NonDuality
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 1:36 pm
by Atla
TimeSeeker wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 1:35 pm
Atla wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 1:27 pm
TimeSeeker wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 1:25 pm
So there is an authority on “philosophy itself”?
Can we ask them if philosophy has a goal?
“This isn’t about logic” he said. Using logic.
Logic is language. Dumbass.
Language is language. Logic is logic. get a fucking grip already.
Logic comes from the Greek word 'λογική'. Logos. Originally meaning "the word" or "what is spoken". Even Wikipedia says so:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic
The fact that you've compartmentalised them is just more evidence for your dualistic mind.
ORIGINALLY you fucktard, not anymore.
How can you be wrong about literally everything. This shouldn't even be possible.
Re: The Neural Basis of NonDuality
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 1:37 pm
by TimeSeeker
Atla wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 1:36 pm
TimeSeeker wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 1:35 pm
Atla wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 1:27 pm
Language is language. Logic is logic. get a fucking grip already.
Logic comes from the Greek word 'λογική'. Logos. Originally meaning "the word" or "what is spoken". Even Wikipedia says so:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic
The fact that you've compartmentalised them is just more evidence for your dualistic mind.
ORIGINALLY you fucktard, not anymore.
How can you be wrong about literally everything. This shouldn't even be possible.
What?!?!?
YOU said you USE logic for philosophy! As in in the PRESENT TENSE!
How do you use logic without language or language without logic!?!?
They are the same fucking thing!
Re: The Neural Basis of NonDuality
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 1:43 pm
by Atla
TimeSeeker wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 1:37 pm
Atla wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 1:36 pm
ORIGINALLY you fucktard, not anymore.
How can you be wrong about literally everything. This shouldn't even be possible.
What?!?!?
YOU said you use logic for philosophy!
How do you use logic without language or language without logic!?!?
They are the same fucking thing!
Logic and language aren't used interchangeably today. That's why your Wiki page says
originally, and continues with:
but coming to mean "thought" or "reason".
Honestly, you've shown me levels of wrongness I haven't considered before. I learned something new, which is a rare gift, I'm grateful for that.
Re: The Neural Basis of NonDuality
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 1:49 pm
by TimeSeeker
Atla wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 1:43 pm
TimeSeeker wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 1:37 pm
Atla wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 1:36 pm
ORIGINALLY you fucktard, not anymore.
How can you be wrong about literally everything. This shouldn't even be possible.
What?!?!?
YOU said you use logic for philosophy!
How do you use logic without language or language without logic!?!?
They are the same fucking thing!
Logic and language aren't used interchangeably today. That's why your Wiki page says
originally, and continues with:
but coming to mean "thought" or "reason".
Honestly, you've shown me levels of wrongness I haven't considered before. I learned something new, which is a rare gift, I'm grateful for that.
So if thought and reason are logic; and logic is separate from language then what the hell is a “logical argument”!?!?
You have compartmentalised your brain so much you can’t even see your own idiocy!
I guess too much context switching is counter-productive to logic/reason
Practice what you preach and tear down those walls in your mind... Maybe then you will see the full picture.