Philosophy Now Forum

accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 8:51 am

Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 8:38 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 8:31 am

It's not a 'belief'. You have been quite open about it. Most women on here manage to be here without having any cybersex with anyone else on here, EVER. You've evidently 'jumped the bones' of multiple times with multiple people. You should start charging them.

Okay I’ll admit it, I’ve had cybersex with Harbal on this forum. I’ve nothing to hide about that truth.

Harbal pursued me though, I just went along with it.

Harbal was the only person on this forum that I had cybersex with, the only one.


If there are others , please name the others?

Age

And there it is, a belief founded on no actual evidence or proof. Just blind belief. And you think I’m the crazy one.

Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 8:29 am

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 8:24 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 8:19 am 'Philosopher' Sad, deluded creature

As a mind has only one job to do and only one means of doing its job, and that job requires the use of words, it is no wonder that the most prevalent disorder of mankind involves names. There is a grave distinction between "I am" and "I am that." one is indicative of awareness, the other of confusion.

When anyone asks me what I am, I just say I am a human "bean" just waiting to be planted. So far, there has been total crop failure in the planting of human beans, but maybe someday, a genetically correct bean will produce a viable product.

Illusions are real.

ill us

i on’s

Nice job in parsing a word. Bad job is the misuse of "is" and "is not". If you cannot get two simple concepts right, well there you go, you are a certified member of the human race.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 9:01 am

Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 8:29 am

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 8:24 am

As a mind has only one job to do and only one means of doing its job, and that job requires the use of words, it is no wonder that the most prevalent disorder of mankind involves names. There is a grave distinction between "I am" and "I am that." one is indicative of awareness, the other of confusion.

When anyone asks me what I am, I just say I am a human "bean" just waiting to be planted. So far, there has been total crop failure in the planting of human beans, but maybe someday, a genetically correct bean will produce a viable product.

Illusions are real.

ill us

i on’s

Nice job in parsing a word. Bad job is the misuse of "is" and "is not". If you cannot get two simple concepts right, well there you go, you are a certified member of the human race.

You’re right, nothing is perfect.

Anymore useful information up your sleeve, mr magician?

Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 6:23 am

Age wrote: ↑Sun Sep 21, 2025 2:04 am

But, 'evil', or just Wrong/abusive doing, is actually 'outside' of God, and absolutely nothing that God wants, nor even created.

Sure, you adult human beings who have the 'freedom' to choose to do absolutely whatever you want to do, are created by the very Thing that is said to have created every thing, but 'your own Wrong doing' is not God, Itself. God wants nothing, and has nothing at all, to do with the Wrong that you adult humans completely freely choose to do. If you adults want to keep doing the Wrong that you all do, then you are completely free to do so. But, God is, always, guiding you other-wise. Although you, obviously, are not always 'listening', and 'hearing'.

God is dreaming every concept of right and wrong, good and evil..etc..etc…God is dreaming cause and effect experiences as and through direct consciousness.

But, how would little old "fairy" 'know' 'this'?

If even God, Itself, is only 'dreaming', and it is God that is 'dreaming up' 'all of this', then, obviously, is only 'dreaming' that 'dreamt up' "fairy", here, to believe, absolutely, that God is dreaming every concept.

So, could, in fact, God have dreamed up "fairy" to imagine and envision Falsehoods? Or, is what "fairy" believes to be true absolutely what is actually irrefutably True, here?

Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 6:23 am There’s something aware it is aware. That something is not an object.

Okay. But, is 'this' just a dream of "fairys", which is nothing but an illusory dream, itself, or, is 'this' a dream of Gods, which might also just be an illusory dream, as well?

Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 6:23 am My question to you Age,

Is this the same "age" that "fairy" was, once more, never going to speak to ever again?

Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 6:23 am is what is that something that is aware it is aware, and knows it’s not an object?

Once again, the One and only Mind, which transpires throughout, and within every thing, within the Universe, Itself.

Obviously the One and only Mind has never ever been 'seen' with the physical eyes, never ever been 'heard' with the physical ears, never ever been smelt with the physical nose, never ever been tasted with they physical mouth nor tongue, and never ever been felt with the physical nerve endings. Yet, you adult human beings keep telling 'me' that there is not just a mind, but many, many minds. And, if the Mind can not be felt, smelt, tasted, heard, nor seen with the physical senses of you human beings, then 'I/t', [the Mind], can be classed in the 'no object' category. However, 'I', the Mind, can, still, be aware of thy Self. Exactly like how Consciousness, Itself, can be Aware of It-Self.

Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 6:23 am If it’s not an object, then what is it exactly?

'It' could be said to be the, exact, same thing as 'thoughts' and 'emotions' are. An Invisible Thing. The difference, however, is that the Mind works differently, compared to how the visible brain works.

Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 6:23 am Will you answer this?

I already have. But, like "magnus anderson" 'you' might believe absolutely otherwise.

Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 9:05 am

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 9:01 am

Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 8:29 am

Illusions are real.

ill us

i on’s

Nice job in parsing a word. Bad job is the misuse of "is" and "is not". If you cannot get two simple concepts right, well there you go, you are a certified member of the human race.

You’re right, nothing is perfect.

Anymore useful information up your sleeve, mr magician?

Sure, do not dry your hair in the microwave oven. I got that tip from Exploding Heads, do you know how many wasted man hours are involved in cleaning up the mess?

Age wrote: “'It' could be said to be the, exact, same thing as 'thoughts' and 'emotions' are. An Invisible Thing. The difference, however, is that the Mind works differently, compared to how the visible brain works.“

——
Response: Thank you for answering my question. I agree with your answer. Do you accept my agreement as being the same as your idea?

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 9:11 am

Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 9:05 am

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 9:01 am

Nice job in parsing a word. Bad job is the misuse of "is" and "is not". If you cannot get two simple concepts right, well there you go, you are a certified member of the human race.

You’re right, nothing is perfect.

Anymore useful information up your sleeve, mr magician?

Sure, do not dry your hair in the microwave oven. I got that tip from Exploding Heads, do you know how many wasted man hours are involved in cleaning up the mess?

Gosh you must be the smartest person you’ve ever met. Congrats

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 8:24 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 8:19 am 'Philosopher' Sad, deluded creature

As a mind has only one job to do and only one means of doing its job, and that job requires the use of words, it is no wonder that the most prevalent disorder of mankind involves names. There is a grave distinction between "I am" and "I am that." one is indicative of awareness, the other of confusion.

When anyone asks me what I am, I just say I am a human "bean" just waiting to be planted. So far, there has been total crop failure in the planting of human beans, but maybe someday, a genetically correct bean will produce a viable product.

Maybe.

Age wrote: “ Okay. But, is 'this' just a dream of "fairys", which is nothing but an illusory dream, itself, or, is 'this' a dream of Gods, which might also just be an illusory dream, as well? “

——

Response: ‘fairy’ is a character in God’s mind, in other words God’s dream. That’s what I think, the I who goes by the name of ‘fairy’

Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 9:15 am Age wrote: “'It' could be said to be the, exact, same thing as 'thoughts' and 'emotions' are. An Invisible Thing. The difference, however, is that the Mind works differently, compared to how the visible brain works.“

——
Response: Thank you for answering my question. I agree with your answer. Do you accept my agreement as being the same as your idea?

From about your very first post I read in this forum of yours I have accepted that what 'you' have been referring to, writing about, and trying to express 'I' have accepted 'that', as being the exact same Thing/idea.

'We' have just chosen different words to 'point to' the exact same Thing. And, 'I' have offered to 'work' 'with you', in order to find the 'Right words', but 'you' chose to 'go alone', here. I have respected your choice, and so have left you to it.

Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 9:22 am Age wrote: “ Okay. But, is 'this' just a dream of "fairys", which is nothing but an illusory dream, itself, or, is 'this' a dream of Gods, which might also just be an illusory dream, as well? “

——

Response: ‘fairy’ is a character in God’s mind, in other words God’s dream. That’s what I think, the I who goes by the name of ‘fairy’

So, you believe that God is an anthropomorphism, a perceptible.

Are you aware that the intelligible can never be perceptible, nor can the perceptible ever be intelligible? i.e. a noun is not a verb, nor is a verb a noun. Or again, a limit is not the material within limits nor is the material within limits a limit.

Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 9:22 am Age wrote: “ Okay. But, is 'this' just a dream of "fairys", which is nothing but an illusory dream, itself, or, is 'this' a dream of Gods, which might also just be an illusory dream, as well? “

——

Response: ‘fairy’ is a character in God’s mind, in other words God’s dream. That’s what I think, the I who goes by the name of ‘fairy’

Okay. So, what is just 'thought', here, is just 'another thought', in one of what just is 'another character', here, in some dream.

Age wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 9:33 am

Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 9:15 am Age wrote: “'It' could be said to be the, exact, same thing as 'thoughts' and 'emotions' are. An Invisible Thing. The difference, however, is that the Mind works differently, compared to how the visible brain works.“

——
Response: Thank you for answering my question. I agree with your answer. Do you accept my agreement as being the same as your idea?

From about your very first post I read in this forum of yours I have accepted that what 'you' have been referring to, writing about, and trying to express 'I' have accepted 'that', as being the exact same Thing/idea.

'We' have just chosen different words to 'point to' the exact same Thing. And, 'I' have offered to 'work' 'with you', in order to find the 'Right words', but 'you' chose to 'go alone', here. I have respected your choice, and so have left you to it.

Can words that are different, still point to the same one idea?

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 9:35 am

Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 9:22 am Age wrote: “ Okay. But, is 'this' just a dream of "fairys", which is nothing but an illusory dream, itself, or, is 'this' a dream of Gods, which might also just be an illusory dream, as well? “

——

Response: ‘fairy’ is a character in God’s mind, in other words God’s dream. That’s what I think, the I who goes by the name of ‘fairy’

So, you believe that God is an anthropomorphism, a perceptible.

Are you aware that the intelligible can never be perceptible, nor can the perceptible ever be intelligible? i.e. a noun is not a verb, nor is a verb a noun. Or again, a limit is not the material within limits nor is the material within limits a limit.

Isn’t a ‘you’ an anthropomorphism?

Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 9:38 am

Age wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 9:33 am

Fairy wrote: ↑Mon Sep 22, 2025 9:15 am Age wrote: “'It' could be said to be the, exact, same thing as 'thoughts' and 'emotions' are. An Invisible Thing. The difference, however, is that the Mind works differently, compared to how the visible brain works.“

——
Response: Thank you for answering my question. I agree with your answer. Do you accept my agreement as being the same as your idea?

From about your very first post I read in this forum of yours I have accepted that what 'you' have been referring to, writing about, and trying to express 'I' have accepted 'that', as being the exact same Thing/idea.

'We' have just chosen different words to 'point to' the exact same Thing. And, 'I' have offered to 'work' 'with you', in order to find the 'Right words', but 'you' chose to 'go alone', here. I have respected your choice, and so have left you to it.

Can words that are different, still point to the same one idea?

Of course. For example, Spirit, Allah, God, Enlightenment, SAGE, plus all of the many other words, point to the same one so-called 'idea'.