Philosophy Now Forum

What's that woman trying to do?
She's a bit short for the job.
A woman also runs the Secret Service. A Biden hire.
Hmmm. Just sayin' the facts.

What's the sum total of the facts?

Impenitent wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2024 11:56 pm teach your children to attempt to assassinate your political opponents

-Imp

Most likely a boy child would receive that unwell teaching.

If it's a girl and not taught well, she could find herself having to have an abortion someday.

Walker wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 12:29 am

Impenitent wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2024 11:56 pm teach your children to attempt to assassinate your political opponents

-Imp

Most likely a boy child would receive that unwell teaching.

If it's a girl and not taught well, she could find herself having to have an abortion someday.

And, if you parents, in the days when this was being written, had been taught 'well', then your children would not be wanting to have abortions. In fact, if you adult human beings, in the days when this was being written, had been taught 'well', then you would also not be 'judging' anyone for anything, including when choosing to have an abortions, you would already know, exactly, 'why' all of you human beings do what you all do, and so there would be no more of the 'judging' observed by this one here, at all.

Seeing as how I'm the lonely boy of Age's imagination, a dialogue with self:

Q: Why do women have to have abortions?
A: Unwell teachings. (Short and sweet, universal and complete.)

Q: But what about in the script where it says, either the mother's life or the baby's life? That's not because of unwell teaching.
A: How often does that happen? (Not often, compared to elective abortion). And if a medical necessity, was not the mother ignorant of certain medical conditions such as hypertension (and its causes) and medical conditions caused by poor pre-natal care before pregnancy?

Walker wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 12:29 am

Impenitent wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2024 11:56 pm teach your children to attempt to assassinate your political opponents

-Imp

Most likely a boy child would receive that unwell teaching.

If it's a girl and not taught well, she could find herself having to have an abortion someday.

If that's complete then it's Parthenogenesis [band name] or she Burglarized Some Sperm - [band name]

That's a rung or two over my head, Slick.

Walker wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 9:25 am Seeing as how I'm the lonely boy of Age's imagination, a dialogue with self:

Q: Why do women have to have abortions?
A: Unwell teachings. (Short and sweet, universal and complete.)

LOL

So, when a "woman" gets raped by a "man", or more, and then 'chooses' not to keep that forced fertilized egg, then this is solely because it is all "her" fault because "she" was not 'taught well', as a child.

Now, if you had been 'taught well' "yourself" "walker", then you would have already known that the question, 'Why do women have to have abortions?' is nonsensical. you would have also already known that blaming "women" for getting raped, because they had not been 'taught well, is beyond absolute absurdity. Also, if you "yourself" had been 'taught well' you would not keep 'blaming' and 'judging' "women" here the way you do.

Walker wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 9:25 am Q: But what about in the script where it says, either the mother's life or the baby's life? That's not because of unwell teaching.

So, after all of this time, you are now saying that the 'one and only simple answer' is not 'unwell teaching' anyway.

Walker wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 9:25 am A: How often does that happen? (Not often, compared to elective abortion). And if a medical necessity, was not the mother ignorant of certain medical conditions such as hypertension (and its causes) and medical conditions caused by poor pre-natal care before pregnancy?

That 'the way' you 'look at' and 'see' things from a Truly closed or narrowed view and perspective of things is because of very 'unwell teachings' is plain and obvious here.

But, that a "woman" 'has to' 'have' an abortion is never necessarily just because of 'unwell teachings'. Obviously, if you 'had' been 'taught well', previously, then you would have already known this irrefutable Fact hee "walker".

Age wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 11:29 pm

Walker wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 9:25 am Seeing as how I'm the lonely boy of Age's imagination, a dialogue with self:

Q: Why do women have to have abortions?
A: Unwell teachings. (Short and sweet, universal and complete.)

LOL

So, when a "woman" gets raped by a "man", or more, and then 'chooses' not to keep that forced fertilized egg, then this is solely because it is all "her" fault because "she" was not 'taught well', as a child.

What a strange and twisted conclusion, with the bonus of sneering insults. Age, you sound like a little punk. Is that how you were raised to sound? Do activate some situational awareness and at least strive to sound like a philosopher. Do try and make yourself worthy of my attention with something more than your offering of ignorance to the spirit of rationality.

When a woman is raped, which means penetrated without her consent, then she is a victim. She has been overpowered by a man because of unknown, unanticipated, and uncontrollable variables that appeared during her ongoing assessment of personal security and safety. For example, those poor women in Israel were raped and murdered at the hands of the Hamas animals, because of the Hamas animals … and Age, in order to not be an animal yourself, you damn well should be respectful when discussing such things and in fact, perhaps first bow your head in a moment of silence and respect for the poor women who have so suffered.

However, in most situations that result in the need for the vast majority of abortions, the woman is not overpowered, and the variables of her situation resulting in pregnancy are known, controllable, and even anticipated.

Come back at another time in the history of the world in which this was written, Age, when you are more alert concerning how to speak to adults in a philosophical venue.

(As I have done, pretend you're the child of an adult raising you, and that you've just been taught well. Drink deeply, my colt.)

Walker wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 5:59 am

Age wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 11:29 pm

Walker wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 9:25 am Seeing as how I'm the lonely boy of Age's imagination, a dialogue with self:

Q: Why do women have to have abortions?
A: Unwell teachings. (Short and sweet, universal and complete.)

LOL

So, when a "woman" gets raped by a "man", or more, and then 'chooses' not to keep that forced fertilized egg, then this is solely because it is all "her" fault because "she" was not 'taught well', as a child.

What a strange and twisted conclusion, with the bonus of sneering insults.

Well by the actual words that you have chosen to use above here, then this is, exactly, what you were saying.

Walker wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 5:59 am Age, you sound like a little punk. Is that how you were raised to sound? Do activate some situational awareness and at least strive to sound like a philosopher. Do try and make yourself worthy of my attention with something more than your offering of ignorance to the spirit of rationality.

So, you, an obviously unwell taught human being, state that and claim that ' "woman" have to have abortions '. But, when I point out that "women" do not have to have abortions, you then state and claim that there is a simple reason that they do have to have abortions, and that 'that one and only reason' is one that 'everyone knows'.

And, when I point out that absolute Wrongness of your claims here, then you state and claim that it is me being what you call, 'ignorant to the spirit of rationality'.

you did not show 'rationality' from the outset when you asked the irrational and nonsensical question, 'Why do woman have to have abortions?'

Walker wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 5:59 am When a woman is raped, which means penetrated without her consent, then she is a victim.

Even this you cannot get Right. Unless, of course, the laws of the country you reside in are skewed, and you are relying on those distorted laws here.

Walker wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 5:59 amShe has been overpowered by a man because of unknown, unanticipated, and uncontrollable variables that appeared during her ongoing assessment of personal security and safety.

1. Why did you use and write the word 'man' here?

2. What you said and wrote here could be seen as and taken as victim blaming.

3. Why do you have so many very narrowed and closed views here?

Walker wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 5:59 am For example, those poor women in Israel were raped and murdered at the hands of the Hamas animals, because of the Hamas animals …

What does countries of origin have to do with any thing here? And, why are you calling some, or a group, of 'human beings' animals? Are you not, yet, aware that all of you humans are animals?

Walker wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 5:59 am and Age, in order to not be an animal yourself, you damn well should be respectful when discussing such things and in fact, perhaps first bow your head in a moment of silence and respect for the poor women who have so suffered.

Well this a perfect example of one trying to shift views onto another, and when I have not done nor said absolutely any thing that you are trying to put on 'me' here.

In fact what you have just done here is provided a perfect example of one trying to get the readers to not notice and recognize the actual Truth here, which can be clearly seen within your writings, or 'between your lines' here if you like.

Do you bow your head in a moment of silence and have respect for the poor "women", children, and "men" who have, are, and will suffer, in "gaza", from those 'animals" within another country?

Walker wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 5:59 am However, in most situations that result in the need for the vast majority of abortions, the woman is not overpowered, and the variables of her situation resulting in pregnancy are known, controllable, and even anticipated.

Okay. So, why did you not just say and write this truth from the outset?

It would have saved you a lot of back and forth writing here

Walker wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 5:59 am Come back at another time in the history of the world in which this was written, Age, when you are more alert concerning how to speak to adults in a philosophical venue.

LOL "walker".

Age wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 7:11 am

You could improve your attention, 'cause you missed this, while sounding like a child ...

Come back at another time in the history of the world in which this was written, Age, when you are more alert concerning how to speak to adults in a philosophical venue.

In the meantime, Age has earned himself a little timeout, hasn't he.

Walker wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 7:15 am

Age wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 7:11 am

You could improve your attention, 'cause you missed this, while sounding like a child ...

Come back at another time in the history of the world in which this was written, Age, when you are more alert concerning how to speak to adults in a philosophical venue.

In the meantime, Age has earned himself a little timeout, hasn't he.

Here 'we' have another example of another one 'running away', while hoping I will leave, after I have have pointed out their False claims, contradictions, and/or inconsistencies, which this one obviously could not counter nor refute.

Age wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 7:11 am LOL "walker".

Yes, for example, the thread title narrows the cause of the disease that has carried you away, and the disease is whatever it is you are clinging to, a clinging that in your demonstrable case, has resulted in formulaic (which by now is probably integrated into knee-jerk) postings applied to diverse topics repeated oft' enough as to be tedious, a being which has been confirmed by independent sightings, all of which points to the need for more contemplation and less trolling in order to perceive the obvious that would have bitten you if it was a snake.

Uh huh.

Walker wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 7:42 am

Age wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 7:11 am LOL "walker".

Yes, for example, the thread title narrows the cause of the disease that has carried you away, and the disease is whatever it is you are clinging to, a clinging that in your demonstrable case, has resulted in formulaic (which by now is probably integrated into knee-jerk) postings applied to diverse topics repeated oft' enough as to be tedious, a being which has been confirmed by independent sightings, all of which points to the need for more contemplation and less trolling in order to perceive the obvious that would have bitten you if it was a snake.

Uh huh.

This, because this one believed, and maybe still believes, that "women" have to have abortions. And, they have to have abortions because they were not taught well, and everyone knew 'this one and only reason'.

Age wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 8:50 am

Walker wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 7:42 am

Age wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 7:11 am LOL "walker".

Yes, for example, the thread title narrows the cause of the disease that has carried you away, and the disease is whatever it is you are clinging to, a clinging that in your demonstrable case, has resulted in formulaic (which by now is probably integrated into knee-jerk) postings applied to diverse topics repeated oft' enough as to be tedious, a being which has been confirmed by independent sightings, all of which points to the need for more contemplation and less trolling in order to perceive the obvious that would have bitten you if it was a snake.

Uh huh.

This, because this one believed, and maybe still believes, that "women" have to have abortions. And, they have to have abortions because they were not taught well, and everyone knew 'this one and only reason'.

Age, you can stop with the idiot act, anytime. As you've been taught here, and which you've ignored in favour of childish, delusional conclusions, any woman who gets an abortion, had to have an abortion. The logic is unassailable.

How next-gen ultrasounds are changing the abortion debate
https://nypost.com/2022/10/22/how-next- ... on-debate/

But in her search for a medical professional who could confirm she was pregnant, Sarah — who lacked health insurance at the time — decided to schedule a free ultrasound while still in her first trimester. “It started with me just kind of googling free ultrasounds, and then it turned into a whole thing, with me making a decision to keep the pregnancy right there on the spot.”

Sarah, who’d had an abortion a year prior, realized as soon as she saw the baby on the screen that she wanted to go through with this pregnancy.

“I was feeling guilty about doing it again, under a very similar situation,” she recalled. “But because I had an ultrasound, I decided to have my son. It had only been a year [since my last abortion], so the universe was telling me I was going to be a mother — and that I was going to do it with or without the father.”

Comment: It’s good for women to know what they are killing when they get an abortion, rather than hide behind the debunked, unscientific “clump of cells” rationalization. In the article, once the woman was taught well with the ultrasound that in fact that was a growing human in her tummy, she realized that the societal teachings of abortion being her only option, were false. She had a moment of clarity and realized that she did not have to have an abortion ... and so she didn't. The ultrasound machine taught her well, with life as the measure.