Page 17 of 30
Re: Philosophy
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2022 4:57 pm
by henry quirk
B,
I chose a very femimine name 'Belinda'.
Becuz you're a woman, yes?
I claim the right to be treated as an honorary man in situations where the male sex has the power.
If indeed you are a woman then you have no right to be treated as anything else.
If you had opted to be called Henriette I'd support your efforts to be treated as an honorary man.
I'm a guy. I was born a guy; I'll die a guy. If girls rise to power, I won't demand
honorary woman (cuz I'm a guy).
Re: Philosophy
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2022 5:22 pm
by promethean75
"I claim the right to be treated as an honorary man in situations where the male sex has the power."
henry and i will do no such thing, young lady. you will not destroy western civilization with this fake post-structural identity crisis you and the goddamn communists made up.
you have to be a woman and you have to be called a woman, belinda.
but while this is a man's world, henry and i want you to remember that
it wouldn't be nothing... NOOOTHING!!...without a woman or a girl
Re: Philosophy
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2022 5:30 pm
by henry quirk
you have to be a woman
She really doesn't have a choice about it.
and you have to be called a woman, belinda.
Since that's what she
is, it makes sense that's what she's called.
unless, of course, she's been lyin' all this time and actually is a guy...if so: shame on him
Re: Philosophy
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2022 5:33 pm
by Belinda
promethean75 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 08, 2022 5:22 pm
"I claim the right to be treated as an honorary man in situations where the male sex has the power."
henry and i will do no such thing, young lady. you will not destroy western civilization with this fake post-structural identity crisis you and the goddamn communists made up.
you have to be a woman and you have to be called a woman, belinda.
but while this is a man's world, henry and i want you to remember that
it wouldn't be nothing... NOOOTHING!!...without a woman or a girl
Thanks for the irony Promethean.
Re: Philosophy
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2022 7:07 pm
by FlashDangerpants
henry quirk wrote: ↑Mon Aug 01, 2022 1:44 pm
BTW: biggy wants to interrogate you about all the times I've been wrong, in-forum, on BIG STUFF, and have admitted to bein' wrong. Just a heads up.
Whenever that happened, I did it by understanding what your argument was, and comparing it to other beliefs you do have. I mention this today because you are currently wandering around insisting that everyone who disagrees with you is an amoralist, and you aren't making a high quality persuasive argument by that method because you are not taking any trouble to understand anyone's arguments but your own.
Re: Philosophy
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2022 8:15 pm
by henry quirk
Whenever that happened, I did it by understanding what your argument was, and comparing it to other beliefs you do have.
And I'm in your debt for it.
*
I mention this today because you are currently wandering around insisting that everyone who disagrees with you is an amoralist
Amoralist is my word for folks who reject the possibility of moral fact, or who say -- flat out -- there is no moral fact. As I asked Pete: would you prefer
moral opinionist?
*
you are not taking any trouble to understand anyone's arguments but your own.
Oh, I get
yours:
there's no evidence of moral fact: there is no moral fact.
*
you aren't making a high quality persuasive argument
I'm not tryin' too. As I say...
henry quirk wrote: ↑Tue Aug 09, 2022 11:42 pm there's a gulf between you and me as amoralist and moralist I don't know how to bridge. Neither of us moves the other.
I do, however, know how to hold the amoralist to his own standard. Pete, for example...
Peter Holmes wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 3:37 pm...the slur that we who deny the existence of moral facts are amoralists is a vicious libel. Prove that it's true, or withdraw it. Do the right thing.
I laughed at him. I mean, really, an amoralist, a guy who's the forum champion of
there is no moral fact, there's only moral opinion wants me to
do the right thing. How is
that not high-larious?
And you with the whole...
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Tue Aug 09, 2022 1:36 pmYou hae the right to be treated in accord with the gender that you know yourself to be
You have a right comin' from a guy who cannot, will not, agree a person has natural rights.
You guys want to deny the cake exists, but you still want your slice.
Re: Philosophy
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2022 8:22 pm
by FlashDangerpants
henry quirk wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 8:15 pm
Whenever that happened, I did it by understanding what your argument was, and comparing it to other beliefs you do have.
And I'm in your debt for it.
*
I mention this today because you are currently wandering around insisting that everyone who disagrees with you is an amoralist
Amoralist is my word for folks who reject the possibility of moral fact, or who say -- flat out -- there is no moral fact. As I asked Pete: would you prefer
moral opinionist?
*
you are not taking any trouble to understand anyone's arguments but your own.
Oh, I get
yours:
there's no evidence of moral fact: there is no moral fact.
*
you aren't making a high quality persuasive argument
I'm not tryin' too. As I say...
henry quirk wrote: ↑Tue Aug 09, 2022 11:42 pm there's a gulf between you and me as amoralist and moralist I don't know how to bridge. Neither of us moves the other.
I do, however, know how to hold the amoralist to his own standard. Pete, for example...
Peter Holmes wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 3:37 pm...the slur that we who deny the existence of moral facts are amoralists is a vicious libel. Prove that it's true, or withdraw it. Do the right thing.
I laughed at him. I mean, really, an amoralist, a guy who's the forum champion of
there is no moral fact, there's only moral opinion wants me to
do the right thing. How is
that not high-larious?
And you with the whole...
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Tue Aug 09, 2022 1:36 pmYou hae the right to be treated in accord with the gender that you know yourself to be
You have a right comin' from a guy who cannot, will not, agree a person has natural rights.
You guys want to deny the cake exists, but you still want your slice.
At any point, have you stopped to wonder if you might have overintepreted what it means to say that morals have more in common with customs, fashions and beliefs than they do with objectively demonstrable fact?
You are misrepresenting your oponent and if you get a sense that they disrespect you in turn, you might have earned it.
Re: Philosophy
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2022 8:59 pm
by henry quirk
At any point, have you stopped to wonder if you might have overintepreted what it means to say that morals have more in common with customs, fashions and beliefs than they do with objectively demonstrable fact?
What's to misinterpret? Fact or opinion: it's one or the other.
You are misrepresenting your oponent
I don't think so.
and if you get a sense that they disrespect you in turn, you might have earned it.
Least of my worries...hell, not a worry at all.
Re: Philosophy
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2022 9:27 pm
by FlashDangerpants
henry quirk wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 8:59 pm
At any point, have you stopped to wonder if you might have overintepreted what it means to say that morals have more in common with customs, fashions and beliefs than they do with objectively demonstrable fact?
What's to misinterpret? Fact or opinion: it's one or the other.
Well that's sad Henry.
Re: Philosophy
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2022 9:58 pm
by henry quirk
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 9:27 pm
henry quirk wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 8:59 pm
At any point, have you stopped to wonder if you might have overintepreted what it means to say that morals have more in common with customs, fashions and beliefs than they do with objectively demonstrable fact?
What's to misinterpret? Fact or opinion: it's one or the other.
Well that's sad Henry.
I agree, though not for your reason.
Re: Philosophy
Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2022 9:23 am
by Belinda
Henry Quirk wrote:
I laughed at him. I mean, really, an amoralist, a guy who's the forum champion of there is no moral fact, there's only moral opinion wants me to do the right thing. How is that not high-larious?
From which culture of belief did you learn your morality from , Henry?
Re: Philosophy
Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:53 am
by henry quirk
Belinda wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 9:23 am
Henry Quirk wrote:
I laughed at him. I mean, really, an amoralist, a guy who's the forum champion of there is no moral fact, there's only moral opinion wants me to do the right thing. How is that not high-larious?
From which culture of belief did you learn your morality from , Henry?
I learned the
conventions & customs of the rough & ready people of south central Louisiana. The
morality is a factory feature.
Re: Philosophy
Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2022 3:07 pm
by Belinda
henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:53 am
Belinda wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 9:23 am
Henry Quirk wrote:
I laughed at him. I mean, really, an amoralist, a guy who's the forum champion of there is no moral fact, there's only moral opinion wants me to do the right thing. How is that not high-larious?
From which culture of belief did you learn your morality from , Henry?
I learned the
conventions & customs of the rough & ready people of south central Louisiana. The
morality is a factory feature.
Well, there you are . You are a child of your particular culture like everyone else is a child of their particular culture.
Re: Philosophy
Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2022 3:28 pm
by henry quirk
Belinda wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 3:07 pm
henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:53 am
Belinda wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 9:23 am
Henry Quirk wrote:
From which culture of belief did you learn your morality from , Henry?
I learned the
conventions & customs of the rough & ready people of south central Louisiana. The
morality is a factory feature.
Well, there you are . You are a child of your particular culture like everyone else is a child of their particular culture.
Yes, B, highlight the
first, ignore the
second.
Re: Philosophy
Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2022 3:31 pm
by FlashDangerpants
henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 3:28 pm
Belinda wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 3:07 pm
henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:53 am
I learned the
conventions & customs of the rough & ready people of south central Louisiana. The
morality is a factory feature.
Well, there you are . You are a child of your particular culture like everyone else is a child of their particular culture.
Yes, B, highlight the
first, ignore the
second.
Do you have any explanation for why hypocrisy is wrong in your moral fact thing there Henry?
You should consult it about now.