attofishpi wrote:SpheresOfBalance wrote:attofishpi wrote:I can state with certainty that you are uncertain of my claim. The only thing i have not yet found in relation to God or 'God' is its true nature.
True, you could be 1 in 7 billion, or maybe more if we consider history, but, this lends to my feeling sure enough, without you expounding on the reason you profess to 'know,' as you have only done so. Care to expound, or would that be risky, many eyes of scrutiny of intellect, may find error in judgment, tarnish your vision, though anyone can be pigheaded?
I believe there are likely to be at least thousands of people on this planet that KNOW God exists, I know sages walk amongst us with far more knowledge and understanding of what God IS than i may ever be fortunate enough to comprehend.
My 'test' began in 1997. It wasn't until November 13 2005 that a sage introduced himself from the ether.
I have already expounded on this forum in the past some experiences that provided reason that i could attest to knowing God exists. The problem is always that the proof i have was derived from ongoing analysis from inputs of my eyes - my ears - and even smells, you the reader will still be left with the predicament of having to believe 1. That i have actually witnessed such an event. 2. That i am of sound mind.
There will always be a very large element of anyone DOUBTing me. As you must know by now i like to extrapolate words, the word DOUBT, the opposite to FAITH even has my initials BT. DO-U-BT? Do i doubt in Gods existence...not anymore.
When you understand that God is all dimensions, that is, all reality then you can start looking at anomalies in the reality we are embedded within, anomalies that are so unlikely to have occurred through natural random events. It was by pointing out these anomalies within the English language and anomalies mapped upon the face of the planet that i attempted to 'teach' as per instruction from the sage.
To expound on my experiences of those 16yrs would require opening up on countless and very personal parts of my life, and you the reader are still going to be only left with the two aforementioned points of constraint...in essence, you will always have DOUBT..in me.
Yes I understand everything you just said. I cannot travel back in time and see through your eyes in that very instance they were opened, and even if I could, me being me, I may not do math the same as you, such that I would see this evidence as you have seen. But make no mistake,
I have seen these things too, like I'm sure everyone has, For instance I just heard one in the distance, as I typed the phrase above in
red, coincidence, or a sign from the creator? The difference between you and I is that I understand that there is such a thing as coincidence and that we all are capable of finding rabbits, dogs, and creators in the clouds as we lie on our backs trying to do so, because of any certain amount of predisposition, as manifest due to our experience, from the moments we open our eyes as a infant through childhood, and on through adulthood. That the mind is able to see anything that it wants to see, and that insanity is merely how we interact with others and our selves, as a result of what we think we see.
I say here and now that in the truest understanding of knowing, you only 'believe' you 'know,' that you cannot in fact 'know,' but that, that fact is good enough for you, in order to claim you 'know.' Fine, you are free to lead your life as you see fit, it is in fact only yours to command. And that you do not have to answer to anyone other than whom you choose, that being a god or otherwise. And that you are right, you could never convince me otherwise, as I see with my faculties alone, and I've never really been a gambler, as with 'knowledge.' Or at least I try and keep it to a minimum.
I shall not waste my life anywhere other than on this fence, as it is in fact a very tall one, as I view and expand on, the potential of either of the two vistas. I would rather be certain about being uncertain, as I gaze at the beauty of life, existence, and the universe, as the truth shall eventually unfold, to what ever degree that it does, before I die, than to be certain of either choice, and it being the incorrect one; to bet on a losing horse named regret. "If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice." Which doesn't mean one can't see either choice from their perch, as a matter of fact, from my perspective, I can see that neither purposeful creation nor evolution necessarily disagree with one another. But that the words, as written by some men, can be entirely different.
As we have just referenced, as to your and my beliefs, there is no necessary accounting for the words of men.
