Re: Could Trump and Company Destroy Us?
Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2025 2:10 am
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Notice how CLOSED some of these human beings, REALLY WERE, back when this was being written.accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Feb 24, 2025 6:24 pm I pity you poor Americans. Musk is obsessively quoting Milton Friedman and Ayn Rand. The man is a complete drop-kick. Utterly clueless. He's never going to get to Mars--he spends his life posting naive nonsense on X
OBVIOUSLY, being the 'monetary richest one on the planet earth', at any given time, MEANS that you REALLY DO NOT CARE ABOUT others. And, OF COURSE 'that one' would be HAPPY, GLEEFUL, and/or CHEERFUL if and when they can REDUCE their businesses 'running costs', and thus INCREASE the PROFITEERING MARGINS, by REDUCING the 'giving of money' away, TO others. .accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Feb 24, 2025 6:24 pm Imagine being the richest person on the planet and posting gleefully about how many thousands of people are going to be jobless because of you.
accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Feb 24, 2025 6:24 pm Most of them just ordinary people doing not particularly highly paid jobs. Such a nice man.
Just out of curiosity, 'what', EXACTLY, is 'insanity', TO you, in 'that link', here?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 2:10 am Today's news: This is insanity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SaFVRIw3Ako
Could you have OVER-USED and MISUSED the term 'wokie' so much that it now has NO meaning'?accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 6:34 am Wokies have over-used and misused the term 'far right' so much that it now has no meaning.
LOL EXACTLY like when ANY one who has a DIFFERENT view FROM you they are then, AUTOMATICALLY, TO you, A so-called 'wokie'.accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 6:34 am Everyone who disagress with them is automatically 'far right'.
But, you have absolutely NOTHING TO ANSWER FOR, here, right "accelafine"?accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 6:34 am Women's rights campaigners are 'far right' for saying that men aren't women and shoudn't be in women's sports and spaces. FFS. They've turned the language upside down to the extent that people are losing the ability to communicate. They certainly have a lot to answer for. Wankers.
So you have nothing to counter anything that I've said, just smarmy, condescending nothingness. Your usual MO. I'm simply reporting what I've SEEN. Fuck off you worthless cretin. Go and learn some conversational skills.Age wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 7:18 amNotice how CLOSED some of these human beings, REALLY WERE, back when this was being written.accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Feb 24, 2025 6:24 pm I pity you poor Americans. Musk is obsessively quoting Milton Friedman and Ayn Rand. The man is a complete drop-kick. Utterly clueless. He's never going to get to Mars--he spends his life posting naive nonsense on X
'Complete drop-kick', 'Clueless, and utterly so', 'Never going to achieve some thing'. 'Spends his life', and, 'posting naive nonsense'.
So, IS, or even COULD, 'this one' have ANY 'favourable' view OF 'the one' being spoken ABOUT?
Do 'current' 'BELIEFS or VIEWS' AFFECT 'the way' one 'LOOKS', and thus 'future views and/or beliefs', or, has 'past experiences' EFFECTED 'the way' that one 'currently' 'sees' and 'view' things? Or, BOTH?OBVIOUSLY, being the 'monetary richest one on the planet earth', at any given time, MEANS that you REALLY DO NOT CARE ABOUT others. And, OF COURSE 'that one' would be HAPPY, GLEEFUL, and/or CHEERFUL if and when they can REDUCE their businesses 'running costs', and thus INCREASE the PROFITEERING MARGINS, by REDUCING the 'giving of money' away, TO others. .accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Feb 24, 2025 6:24 pm Imagine being the richest person on the planet and posting gleefully about how many thousands of people are going to be jobless because of you.
accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Feb 24, 2025 6:24 pm Most of them just ordinary people doing not particularly highly paid jobs. Such a nice man.
What are you even SAYING, cretin? You are so far up your own arse that you are just an anus floating in the air.Age wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 7:32 amCould you have OVER-USED and MISUSED the term 'wokie' so much that it now has NO meaning'?accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 6:34 am Wokies have over-used and misused the term 'far right' so much that it now has no meaning.
If fact, are you even ABLE TO DEFINE what the word 'wokie' even MEANS, TO you, EXACTLY?
LOL EXACTLY like when ANY one who has a DIFFERENT view FROM you they are then, AUTOMATICALLY, TO you, A so-called 'wokie'.accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 6:34 am Everyone who disagress with them is automatically 'far right'.
But, you have absolutely NOTHING TO ANSWER FOR, here, right "accelafine"?accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 6:34 am Women's rights campaigners are 'far right' for saying that men aren't women and shoudn't be in women's sports and spaces. FFS. They've turned the language upside down to the extent that people are losing the ability to communicate. They certainly have a lot to answer for. Wankers.
LOLaccelafine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 7:59 amSo you have nothing to counter anything that I've said, just smarmy, condescending nothingness. Your usual MO. I'm simply reporting what I've SEEN. Fuck off you worthless cretin. Go and learn some conversational skills.Age wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 7:18 amNotice how CLOSED some of these human beings, REALLY WERE, back when this was being written.accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Feb 24, 2025 6:24 pm I pity you poor Americans. Musk is obsessively quoting Milton Friedman and Ayn Rand. The man is a complete drop-kick. Utterly clueless. He's never going to get to Mars--he spends his life posting naive nonsense on X
'Complete drop-kick', 'Clueless, and utterly so', 'Never going to achieve some thing'. 'Spends his life', and, 'posting naive nonsense'.
So, IS, or even COULD, 'this one' have ANY 'favourable' view OF 'the one' being spoken ABOUT?
Do 'current' 'BELIEFS or VIEWS' AFFECT 'the way' one 'LOOKS', and thus 'future views and/or beliefs', or, has 'past experiences' EFFECTED 'the way' that one 'currently' 'sees' and 'view' things? Or, BOTH?OBVIOUSLY, being the 'monetary richest one on the planet earth', at any given time, MEANS that you REALLY DO NOT CARE ABOUT others. And, OF COURSE 'that one' would be HAPPY, GLEEFUL, and/or CHEERFUL if and when they can REDUCE their businesses 'running costs', and thus INCREASE the PROFITEERING MARGINS, by REDUCING the 'giving of money' away, TO others. .accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Feb 24, 2025 6:24 pm Imagine being the richest person on the planet and posting gleefully about how many thousands of people are going to be jobless because of you.
accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Feb 24, 2025 6:24 pm Most of them just ordinary people doing not particularly highly paid jobs. Such a nice man.
So, ONCE MORE, you are NOT ABLE TO COMPREHEND.accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 8:01 amWhat are you even SAYING, cretin?Age wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 7:32 amCould you have OVER-USED and MISUSED the term 'wokie' so much that it now has NO meaning'?accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 6:34 am Wokies have over-used and misused the term 'far right' so much that it now has no meaning.
If fact, are you even ABLE TO DEFINE what the word 'wokie' even MEANS, TO you, EXACTLY?
LOL EXACTLY like when ANY one who has a DIFFERENT view FROM you they are then, AUTOMATICALLY, TO you, A so-called 'wokie'.accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 6:34 am Everyone who disagress with them is automatically 'far right'.
But, you have absolutely NOTHING TO ANSWER FOR, here, right "accelafine"?accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 6:34 am Women's rights campaigners are 'far right' for saying that men aren't women and shoudn't be in women's sports and spaces. FFS. They've turned the language upside down to the extent that people are losing the ability to communicate. They certainly have a lot to answer for. Wankers.
Did you, REALLY, just SAY 'that' IN A 'philosophy forum'?accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 8:01 am You are so far up your own arse that you are just an anus floating in the air.
Just stating facts. Poor Fairy will be disappointed by your Ken groin.Age wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 8:33 amSo, ONCE MORE, you are NOT ABLE TO COMPREHEND.accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 8:01 amWhat are you even SAYING, cretin?Age wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 7:32 am
Could you have OVER-USED and MISUSED the term 'wokie' so much that it now has NO meaning'?
If fact, are you even ABLE TO DEFINE what the word 'wokie' even MEANS, TO you, EXACTLY?
LOL EXACTLY like when ANY one who has a DIFFERENT view FROM you they are then, AUTOMATICALLY, TO you, A so-called 'wokie'.
But, you have absolutely NOTHING TO ANSWER FOR, here, right "accelafine"?
What I AM SAYING IS, what you are DOING, here, IS, EXACTLY, what you CRITICIZE others FOR DOING?
But, you can NOT SEE, and COMPREHEND, 'this IRREFUTABLE Fact'.
And this is just because you BELIEVE, ABSOLUTELY, that you are BETTER than others.pDid you, REALLY, just SAY 'that' IN A 'philosophy forum'?accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 8:01 am You are so far up your own arse that you are just an anus floating in the air.
Again, is 'this', here, what you call 'conversational skills'?
LOLaccelafine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 8:37 amJust stating facts.Age wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 8:33 amSo, ONCE MORE, you are NOT ABLE TO COMPREHEND.
What I AM SAYING IS, what you are DOING, here, IS, EXACTLY, what you CRITICIZE others FOR DOING?
But, you can NOT SEE, and COMPREHEND, 'this IRREFUTABLE Fact'.
And this is just because you BELIEVE, ABSOLUTELY, that you are BETTER than others.pDid you, REALLY, just SAY 'that' IN A 'philosophy forum'?accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 8:01 am You are so far up your own arse that you are just an anus floating in the air.
Again, is 'this', here, what you call 'conversational skills'?
LOL SPEAKING and WRITING 'like this' IN A 'philosophy forum', of ALL PLACES.
Liars aren't worth listening to. You have shown yourself to be a liar multiple times, Ken. No one cares what liars have to say. LOL all you like. No one cares.Age wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 8:49 amLOLaccelafine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 8:37 amJust stating facts.Age wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 8:33 am
So, ONCE MORE, you are NOT ABLE TO COMPREHEND.
What I AM SAYING IS, what you are DOING, here, IS, EXACTLY, what you CRITICIZE others FOR DOING?
But, you can NOT SEE, and COMPREHEND, 'this IRREFUTABLE Fact'.
And this is just because you BELIEVE, ABSOLUTELY, that you are BETTER than others.p
Did you, REALLY, just SAY 'that' IN A 'philosophy forum'?
Again, is 'this', here, what you call 'conversational skills'?
LOL
LOL
It is like 'this one' does NOT HAVE A CLUE AS TO WHAT AN ACTUAL 'fact' IS, EXACTLY?
LOL LOOK AT 'what' you ACTUALLY SAID, and WROTE, here, and INFORM, and EXPLAIN TO, the readers', here, HOW 'that' is A 'fact', EXACTLY?
LOL SPEAKING and WRITING 'like this' IN A 'philosophy forum', of ALL PLACES.
It is like it thinks it is IN some 'office or work place' where 'TRYING TO' DENIGRATE others is PART and PARCEL OF 'normal adult misbehavior'.
LOLaccelafine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 9:10 amLiars aren't worth listening to. You have shown yourself to be a liar multiple times, Ken. No one cares what liars have to say. LOL all you like. No one cares.Age wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 8:49 amLOL
LOL
LOL
It is like 'this one' does NOT HAVE A CLUE AS TO WHAT AN ACTUAL 'fact' IS, EXACTLY?
LOL LOOK AT 'what' you ACTUALLY SAID, and WROTE, here, and INFORM, and EXPLAIN TO, the readers', here, HOW 'that' is A 'fact', EXACTLY?
LOL SPEAKING and WRITING 'like this' IN A 'philosophy forum', of ALL PLACES.accelafine wrote: ↑ Poor Fairy will be disappointed by your Ken groin.
It is like it thinks it is IN some 'office or work place' where 'TRYING TO' DENIGRATE others is PART and PARCEL OF 'normal adult misbehavior'.
'This one', OBVIOUSLY, could NOT back up and support its BELIEFS, and CLAIMS, here. it has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING, here, other than 'these types' of RESPONSES, which are, OBVIOUSLY, ONLY ATTEMPTS AT LYING and DECEPTION.