Could Trump and Company Destroy Us?

[Gary Childress]

Today's news: This is insanity.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SaFVRIw3Ako

[accelafine]

Wokies have over-used and misused the term 'far right' so much that it now has no meaning. Everyone who disagress with them is automatically 'far right'. Women's rights campaigners are 'far right' for saying that men aren't women and shoudn't be in women's sports and spaces. FFS. They've turned the language upside down to the extent that people are losing the ability to communicate. They certainly have a lot to answer for. Wankers.

[Age]

I pity you poor Americans. Musk is obsessively quoting Milton Friedman and Ayn Rand. The man is a complete drop-kick. Utterly clueless. He's never going to get to Mars--he spends his life posting naive nonsense on X

Notice how CLOSED some of these human beings, REALLY WERE, back when this was being written.

'Complete drop-kick', 'Clueless, and utterly so', 'Never going to achieve some thing'. 'Spends his life', and, 'posting naive nonsense'.

So, IS, or even COULD, 'this one' have ANY 'favourable' view OF 'the one' being spoken ABOUT?

Do 'current' 'BELIEFS or VIEWS' AFFECT 'the way' one 'LOOKS', and thus 'future views and/or beliefs', or, has 'past experiences' EFFECTED 'the way' that one 'currently' 'sees' and 'view' things? Or, BOTH?

Imagine being the richest person on the planet and posting gleefully about how many thousands of people are going to be jobless because of you.

OBVIOUSLY, being the 'monetary richest one on the planet earth', at any given time, MEANS that you REALLY DO NOT CARE ABOUT others. And, OF COURSE 'that one' would be HAPPY, GLEEFUL, and/or CHEERFUL if and when they can REDUCE their businesses 'running costs', and thus INCREASE the PROFITEERING MARGINS, by REDUCING the 'giving of money' away, TO others. .

Most of them just ordinary people doing not particularly highly paid jobs. Such a nice man.

[Age]

Today's news: This is insanity.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SaFVRIw3Ako

Just out of curiosity, 'what', EXACTLY, is 'insanity', TO you, in 'that link', here?

[Age]

Wokies have over-used and misused the term 'far right' so much that it now has no meaning.

Could you have OVER-USED and MISUSED the term 'wokie' so much that it now has NO meaning'?

If fact, are you even ABLE TO DEFINE what the word 'wokie' even MEANS, TO you, EXACTLY?

Everyone who disagress with them is automatically 'far right'.

LOL EXACTLY like when ANY one who has a DIFFERENT view FROM you they are then, AUTOMATICALLY, TO you, A so-called 'wokie'.

Women's rights campaigners are 'far right' for saying that men aren't women and shoudn't be in women's sports and spaces. FFS. They've turned the language upside down to the extent that people are losing the ability to communicate. They certainly have a lot to answer for. Wankers.

But, you have absolutely NOTHING TO ANSWER FOR, here, right "accelafine"?

[accelafine]

I pity you poor Americans. Musk is obsessively quoting Milton Friedman and Ayn Rand. The man is a complete drop-kick. Utterly clueless. He's never going to get to Mars--he spends his life posting naive nonsense on X

Notice how CLOSED some of these human beings, REALLY WERE, back when this was being written.

'Complete drop-kick', 'Clueless, and utterly so', 'Never going to achieve some thing'. 'Spends his life', and, 'posting naive nonsense'.

So, IS, or even COULD, 'this one' have ANY 'favourable' view OF 'the one' being spoken ABOUT?

Do 'current' 'BELIEFS or VIEWS' AFFECT 'the way' one 'LOOKS', and thus 'future views and/or beliefs', or, has 'past experiences' EFFECTED 'the way' that one 'currently' 'sees' and 'view' things? Or, BOTH?

Imagine being the richest person on the planet and posting gleefully about how many thousands of people are going to be jobless because of you.

OBVIOUSLY, being the 'monetary richest one on the planet earth', at any given time, MEANS that you REALLY DO NOT CARE ABOUT others. And, OF COURSE 'that one' would be HAPPY, GLEEFUL, and/or CHEERFUL if and when they can REDUCE their businesses 'running costs', and thus INCREASE the PROFITEERING MARGINS, by REDUCING the 'giving of money' away, TO others. .

Most of them just ordinary people doing not particularly highly paid jobs. Such a nice man.

So you have nothing to counter anything that I've said, just smarmy, condescending nothingness. Your usual MO. I'm simply reporting what I've SEEN. Fuck off you worthless cretin. Go and learn some conversational skills.

[accelafine]

Wokies have over-used and misused the term 'far right' so much that it now has no meaning.

Could you have OVER-USED and MISUSED the term 'wokie' so much that it now has NO meaning'?

If fact, are you even ABLE TO DEFINE what the word 'wokie' even MEANS, TO you, EXACTLY?

Everyone who disagress with them is automatically 'far right'.

LOL EXACTLY like when ANY one who has a DIFFERENT view FROM you they are then, AUTOMATICALLY, TO you, A so-called 'wokie'.

Women's rights campaigners are 'far right' for saying that men aren't women and shoudn't be in women's sports and spaces. FFS. They've turned the language upside down to the extent that people are losing the ability to communicate. They certainly have a lot to answer for. Wankers.

But, you have absolutely NOTHING TO ANSWER FOR, here, right "accelafine"?

What are you even SAYING, cretin? You are so far up your own arse that you are just an anus floating in the air.

[Age]

I pity you poor Americans. Musk is obsessively quoting Milton Friedman and Ayn Rand. The man is a complete drop-kick. Utterly clueless. He's never going to get to Mars--he spends his life posting naive nonsense on X

Notice how CLOSED some of these human beings, REALLY WERE, back when this was being written.

'Complete drop-kick', 'Clueless, and utterly so', 'Never going to achieve some thing'. 'Spends his life', and, 'posting naive nonsense'.

So, IS, or even COULD, 'this one' have ANY 'favourable' view OF 'the one' being spoken ABOUT?

Do 'current' 'BELIEFS or VIEWS' AFFECT 'the way' one 'LOOKS', and thus 'future views and/or beliefs', or, has 'past experiences' EFFECTED 'the way' that one 'currently' 'sees' and 'view' things? Or, BOTH?

Imagine being the richest person on the planet and posting gleefully about how many thousands of people are going to be jobless because of you.

OBVIOUSLY, being the 'monetary richest one on the planet earth', at any given time, MEANS that you REALLY DO NOT CARE ABOUT others. And, OF COURSE 'that one' would be HAPPY, GLEEFUL, and/or CHEERFUL if and when they can REDUCE their businesses 'running costs', and thus INCREASE the PROFITEERING MARGINS, by REDUCING the 'giving of money' away, TO others. .

Most of them just ordinary people doing not particularly highly paid jobs. Such a nice man.

So you have nothing to counter anything that I've said, just smarmy, condescending nothingness. Your usual MO. I'm simply reporting what I've SEEN. Fuck off you worthless cretin. Go and learn some conversational skills.

LOL

Is 'this', here, what you call 'conversational skills'?

[Age]

Wokies have over-used and misused the term 'far right' so much that it now has no meaning.

Could you have OVER-USED and MISUSED the term 'wokie' so much that it now has NO meaning'?

If fact, are you even ABLE TO DEFINE what the word 'wokie' even MEANS, TO you, EXACTLY?

Everyone who disagress with them is automatically 'far right'.

LOL EXACTLY like when ANY one who has a DIFFERENT view FROM you they are then, AUTOMATICALLY, TO you, A so-called 'wokie'.

Women's rights campaigners are 'far right' for saying that men aren't women and shoudn't be in women's sports and spaces. FFS. They've turned the language upside down to the extent that people are losing the ability to communicate. They certainly have a lot to answer for. Wankers.

But, you have absolutely NOTHING TO ANSWER FOR, here, right "accelafine"?

What are you even SAYING, cretin?

So, ONCE MORE, you are NOT ABLE TO COMPREHEND.

What I AM SAYING IS, what you are DOING, here, IS, EXACTLY, what you CRITICIZE others FOR DOING?

But, you can NOT SEE, and COMPREHEND, 'this IRREFUTABLE Fact'.

And this is just because you BELIEVE, ABSOLUTELY, that you are BETTER than others.p

You are so far up your own arse that you are just an anus floating in the air.

Did you, REALLY, just SAY 'that' IN A 'philosophy forum'?

Again, is 'this', here, what you call 'conversational skills'?

[accelafine]

Could you have OVER-USED and MISUSED the term 'wokie' so much that it now has NO meaning'?

If fact, are you even ABLE TO DEFINE what the word 'wokie' even MEANS, TO you, EXACTLY?



LOL EXACTLY like when ANY one who has a DIFFERENT view FROM you they are then, AUTOMATICALLY, TO you, A so-called 'wokie'.



But, you have absolutely NOTHING TO ANSWER FOR, here, right "accelafine"?

What are you even SAYING, cretin?

So, ONCE MORE, you are NOT ABLE TO COMPREHEND.

What I AM SAYING IS, what you are DOING, here, IS, EXACTLY, what you CRITICIZE others FOR DOING?

But, you can NOT SEE, and COMPREHEND, 'this IRREFUTABLE Fact'.

And this is just because you BELIEVE, ABSOLUTELY, that you are BETTER than others.p

You are so far up your own arse that you are just an anus floating in the air.

Did you, REALLY, just SAY 'that' IN A 'philosophy forum'?

Again, is 'this', here, what you call 'conversational skills'?

Just stating facts. Poor Fairy will be disappointed by your Ken groin.

[Age]

What are you even SAYING, cretin?

So, ONCE MORE, you are NOT ABLE TO COMPREHEND.

What I AM SAYING IS, what you are DOING, here, IS, EXACTLY, what you CRITICIZE others FOR DOING?

But, you can NOT SEE, and COMPREHEND, 'this IRREFUTABLE Fact'.

And this is just because you BELIEVE, ABSOLUTELY, that you are BETTER than others.p

You are so far up your own arse that you are just an anus floating in the air.

Did you, REALLY, just SAY 'that' IN A 'philosophy forum'?

Again, is 'this', here, what you call 'conversational skills'?

Just stating facts.

LOL
LOL
LOL

It is like 'this one' does NOT HAVE A CLUE AS TO WHAT AN ACTUAL 'fact' IS, EXACTLY?

LOL LOOK AT 'what' you ACTUALLY SAID, and WROTE, here, and INFORM, and EXPLAIN TO, the readers', here, HOW 'that' is A 'fact', EXACTLY?

Poor Fairy will be disappointed by your Ken groin.

LOL SPEAKING and WRITING 'like this' IN A 'philosophy forum', of ALL PLACES.

It is like it thinks it is IN some 'office or work place' where 'TRYING TO' DENIGRATE others is PART and PARCEL OF 'normal adult misbehavior'.

[accelafine]

So, ONCE MORE, you are NOT ABLE TO COMPREHEND.

What I AM SAYING IS, what you are DOING, here, IS, EXACTLY, what you CRITICIZE others FOR DOING?

But, you can NOT SEE, and COMPREHEND, 'this IRREFUTABLE Fact'.

And this is just because you BELIEVE, ABSOLUTELY, that you are BETTER than others.p


Did you, REALLY, just SAY 'that' IN A 'philosophy forum'?

Again, is 'this', here, what you call 'conversational skills'?

Just stating facts.

LOL
LOL
LOL

It is like 'this one' does NOT HAVE A CLUE AS TO WHAT AN ACTUAL 'fact' IS, EXACTLY?

LOL LOOK AT 'what' you ACTUALLY SAID, and WROTE, here, and INFORM, and EXPLAIN TO, the readers', here, HOW 'that' is A 'fact', EXACTLY?

Poor Fairy will be disappointed by your Ken groin.

LOL SPEAKING and WRITING 'like this' IN A 'philosophy forum', of ALL PLACES.

It is like it thinks it is IN some 'office or work place' where 'TRYING TO' DENIGRATE others is PART and PARCEL OF 'normal adult misbehavior'.

Liars aren't worth listening to. You have shown yourself to be a liar multiple times, Ken. No one cares what liars have to say. LOL all you like. No one cares.

[Age]

Just stating facts.

LOL
LOL
LOL

It is like 'this one' does NOT HAVE A CLUE AS TO WHAT AN ACTUAL 'fact' IS, EXACTLY?

LOL LOOK AT 'what' you ACTUALLY SAID, and WROTE, here, and INFORM, and EXPLAIN TO, the readers', here, HOW 'that' is A 'fact', EXACTLY?

Poor Fairy will be disappointed by your Ken groin.

LOL SPEAKING and WRITING 'like this' IN A 'philosophy forum', of ALL PLACES.

It is like it thinks it is IN some 'office or work place' where 'TRYING TO' DENIGRATE others is PART and PARCEL OF 'normal adult misbehavior'.

Liars aren't worth listening to. You have shown yourself to be a liar multiple times, Ken. No one cares what liars have to say. LOL all you like. No one cares.

LOL

Just calling some one A "liar" does NOT mean 'they' are, NOR make 'them' one.

you just MADE another CLAIM, and ACCUSATION, here. So let 'us' SEE if you can and WILL back up and support this ACCUSATION and CLAIM OF yours, here, 'this time'.

WHEN and WHERE, EXACTLY, ARE these 'multiple times', which you CLAIM I HAVE SHOWED "myself" TO BE A "LIAR"?

If you do not provide ANY, then some will SAY that they exist IN your IMAGINATION, ONLY. And, this what you are ATTEMPTING TO DO, here, is NOT WORKING, AT ALL.

Let 'us' NOT FORGET that you, LAUGHINGLY, CLAIMED TO HAVE STATED 'facts'. Which, BECAUSE you could NOT INFORM NOR EXPLAIN TO 'the readers', here, HOW that was A 'fact', you are 'now' 'TRYING TO' DEFLECT, and thus TO ALSO DECEIVE 'the readers', here.

[accelafine]

I'm a liar and a ridiculous poseur.

We know that dear.

[Age]

I'm a liar and a ridiculous poseur.

We know that dear.

'This one', OBVIOUSLY, could NOT back up and support its BELIEFS, and CLAIMS, here. it has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING, here, other than 'these types' of RESPONSES, which are, OBVIOUSLY, ONLY ATTEMPTS AT LYING and DECEPTION.

I, OBVIOUSLY, NEVER SAID NOR WROTE 'the words', which 'this one' HAS PLACED UNDER 'my label', here. And, WORSE STILL, then it 'TRIED TO' PRETEND that it WAS 'me' WHI WROTE 'it'.

How MUCH MORE COULD one LIE, and 'TRY TO' DECEIVE and BETRAY 'the readers', here?