A recent "MIRACLE"

[FlashDangerpants]

I'd simply expect the French to do what the British tax-payer has been paying for (£500,000/pa) - patrol the shores and render pathetic rubber dinghies un-floatable. (how fucking hard is that?)

They haven't committed any crime, they are just floating around in a boat they have every right to be in. You silly fascist pirate.

[attofishpi]

I'd simply expect the French to do what the British tax-payer has been paying for (£500,000/pa) - patrol the shores and render pathetic rubber dinghies un-floatable. (how fucking hard is that?)

They haven't committed any crime, they are just floating around in a boat they have every right to be in. You silly fascist pirate.

Really? - I've seen video of French police doing just that - once or twice - they just need to up the numbers.

So we've got to wait till they get to terra-firma ol' blighty where they can start planning getting stabby of the locals according to you (and your police\media that always portray their stabby actions as a 'mental condition' - never releasing ethnicity - not Islamic commandment)

[FlashDangerpants]

I'd simply expect the French to do what the British tax-payer has been paying for (£500,000/pa) - patrol the shores and render pathetic rubber dinghies un-floatable. (how fucking hard is that?)

They haven't committed any crime, they are just floating around in a boat they have every right to be in. You silly fascist pirate.

Really? - I've seen video of French police doing just that - once or twice - they just need to up the numbers.

So we've got to wait till they get to terra-firma ol' blighty where they can start planning getting stabby of the locals according to you (and your police\media that always portray their stabby actions as a 'mental condition' - never releasing ethnicity - not Islamic commandment)

A civilised country is subject to the rule of law. That includes the property rights of the boat owner when they are on a beach doing nothing illegal, and the law of the sea when they are outside territorial waters, and it includes international obligations under basic humanitarian laws established to prevent vile abuses.

Dictatorships ignores such rules, which is obviously your preference. So at least we have now dealt with the question of whether you are a fascist for once and for all.

[attofishpi]

UK is under a state of emergency in relation to its borders. (or should be)

So. FUCK THE LAW.

[FlashDangerpants]

UK is under a state of emergency in relation to its borders. (or should be)

So. FUCK THE LAW.

Declare an emergency, seize the Chancellery, suspend the law and remove people's rights.... that's how fascism usually works. You seem to have got the hang of it, well done I suppose.

[attofishpi]

UK is under a state of emergency in relation to its borders. (or should be)

So. FUCK THE LAW.

Declare an emergency, seize the Chancellery, suspend the law and remove people's rights.... that's how fascism usually works. You seem to have got the hang of it, well done I suppose.

Oh yeah, that's the plan.

OR

we'll do it your way >2 million immigrants predominantly from Islamic countries (that's legal arrivals in the past few years) + > 7000 illegals of no identification, again predominantly Muslim since Keir Stalin took office.

Give them all the vote while they go about their usual business of stabbing little children, gang raping girls and women, beating and stabbing people of the native British population...-- while they breed like rabbits at the expense of working British citizens.

Their vote will have Muslims in all positions of power (as is the case across the Isles and gaining all the time) - BLASPHEMY laws against criticism of Islam (I think that's already what Starmer has got through or is being pushed)

THEN, and here is the clincher.

ISLAMIC CALIPHATE.

[FlashDangerpants]

UK is under a state of emergency in relation to its borders. (or should be)

So. FUCK THE LAW.

Declare an emergency, seize the Chancellery, suspend the law and remove people's rights.... that's how fascism usually works. You seem to have got the hang of it, well done I suppose.

Oh yeah, that's the plan.

OR

we'll do it your way >2 million immigrants predominantly from Islamic countries (that's legal arrivals in the past few years) + > 7000 illegals of no identification, again predominantly Muslim since Keir Stalin took office.

Give them all the vote while they go about their usual business of stabbing little children, gang raping girls and women, beating and stabbing people of the native British population...-- while they breed like rabbits at the expense of working British citizens.

Their vote will have Muslims in all positions of power (as is the case across the Isles and gaining all the time) - BLASPHEMY laws against criticism of Islam (I think that's already what Starmer has got through or is being pushed)

THEN, and here is the clincher.

ISLAMIC CALIPHATE.

Now you are going full Nazi

[attofishpi]

..and you and any offspring will be singing Alu Ah Akhbar!!! ...rather too soon.

PS. The Nazis hated the Jews almost as much as your Muslim mates.

[FlashDangerpants]

..and you and any offspring will be singing Alu Ah Akhbar!!! ...rather too soon.

PS. The Nazis hated the Jews almost as much as your Muslim mates.

The Nazis of the 1920s adopted the prevailing hatred of one specific religion that was generally prevalent at the time, and they elevated it with talk of global emergency, imminent takeovers and so on in order to justify overthrowing democracy and the rule of law in order to pursue a murderous hate campaign against that one particular religion and its adherents.

Today, you guys are just following the fashion of disliking a new particular religion, and justifying its suppression with trumped up talk of emergencies and imminent takeovers in order to justify overthrowing democracy and the rule of law.

[Age]

[Once more, this one tries to 'deflect away' from the irrefutable Fact that it will not 'clarify'.

Really? Gosh, I thought I had explained to, hm, a number of times why I don't clarify in most instances when you want me to. Did you not read that?

No. Where and when was 'it' written, exactly?

Now, let 'us' see if this one clarifies, this time.

IOW here you are saying I am deflecting away from this, when in fact, I have owned and explained this openly.

But, you have not clarified this at all. As is proved absolutely True, Right, Accurate, and Correct.

[Age]

Once again, you completely and utter missed 'the point' I was just making here. That is; what you 'presume' and 'believe' was 'cluelessness/lack of empathy', in my, alleged, 'priorities', did not even exist. Because what you 'believe' were 'my priorities' are, absolutely, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect.

What bloated language you use for what could be a short sentence.

Okay. And, what unnecessary words you have just used.

But, deflection, through unnecessary claims, is but just one of your, devious, tactics.

[Age]

As expected, our transcendent non-human being in his own mind denies the obvious about himself.

Once more:

1. 'I' am not 'yours'.

2. There are no 'ones', his, nor her, own minds'.

3. you have failed, absolutely, to just express what is, supposedly, obvious here. So, there is absolutely nothing here even to 'deny'.

4. I have not denied any thing that is imagined by this one here.

4. The word 'himself' is an oxymoron.

[Age]

This one here claims that there is a 'human mind'
..

And there is, now fuck off.

LOL One reading this might never have imagined that 'these people', back then, actually spoke and wrote 'like this', and in a 'philosophy forum' of all places.

But, here 'it' is, for all to 'look at', and 'see'.

Absolutely nothing presented other than 'A belief', only, oh and 'a way' to try to get rid of one who does not agree with and accept one's own unverified and unjustified belief.

[Atla]

This one here claims that there is a 'human mind'
..

And there is, now fuck off.

LOL One reading this might never have imagined that
..

Doesn't matter what someone as completely retarded as you might or might not imagine.

[Age]

So what is it, you put your dress and makeup on then think of ways to abuse a schizophrenic - you must be so proud of yourself.

You've been hounding the autistic guy about getting a job, what position do you think are you in to complain?

Autistic guy? I assume you are talking about Age - the wackjob that has been continuously hounding ME about any facts regarding my employment.

What do you mean by 'hounding'?

you came here, made claims, and I just questioning 'your claims', for clarity, for what I will be challenging you on.

Why would one who has absolutely nothing to hide, nor fear, feel 'hounded', and especially so in a philosophy forum of all places?

TIT-4-TAT (u great TIT)