Currant Buns and Pop Guns - The Big Bang

[FlashDangerpants]

The fact that you can't even tell that this ...

I have NEVER ONCE mentioned absolutely ANY thing about 'me' being 'amazing". And ANY PERCEPTION of this has been of your OWN MAKING.

Conflicts with this...

LISTEN, MY CLAIMS ARE IRREFUTABLE, and your USELESSNESS in PROVING otherwise is PROVING this True.

Is why you are on all those ignore lists.

And, ONCE AGAIN, your ONLY ABILITY to ATTEMPT to RIDICULE or PUT the 'me' DOWN does NOT go UNNOTICED.

Are you going to tell god what a naughty boy I am?



You spam the absolute fuck out of this forum, if I want to make a comment about you, I will do exactly as I please.

[Age]

Instead of 'trying to' CRITICIZE 'the writer' how about you 'try to' CRITIQUE 'the writings' INSTEAD?

Because I saw what you wrote about magnetism. After years of your tripe about how easy it is to seeeee thhhheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee truth of things, your only actual attempt to tell one of these truths instead of tell us how amazing you are for knowing them all.... was shit stupid and boring all at once.

That way you will NOT appear as the WEAK and USELESS person you ARE portraying "yourself" here as, now.

Even your taunts are weak and uninteresting, they provide no inspiration for a counter,

They are NOT 'taunts'. They are JUST Facts. Unlike your CLAIMS, which are OBVIOUSLY False, Wrong, AND Incorrect.

Also, there is "NO inspiration for a counter" from you, BECAUSE you are completely and utterly UNABLE to counter Facts.

I'm too bored right now to even accuse you of having the contents of a diseased weasel's rectal cavity for a brain or whatever. It's not worth doing, this is boring, you are boring me.

[FlashDangerpants]

That way you will NOT appear as the WEAK and USELESS person you ARE portraying "yourself" here as, now.

Even your taunts are weak and uninteresting, they provide no inspiration for a counter,

They are NOT 'taunts'. They are JUST Facts. Unlike your CLAIMS, which are OBVIOUSLY False, Wrong, AND Incorrect.

You tried to taunt me with a claim that I am weak and useless. That much is quite obvious and you are, by any standard, a liar.

It can't be a fact that I am factually useless, I could be put to use for many purposes such as using my skull as a flowerpot on my death. You may believe that I am useless, but you are demonstrably incorrect when you assert it as a fact.

So now you are a proven liar. And it seems I can't be all that useless, having done the proving.

[Age]

The fact that you can't even tell that this ...

I have NEVER ONCE mentioned absolutely ANY thing about 'me' being 'amazing". And ANY PERCEPTION of this has been of your OWN MAKING.

Conflicts with this...

LISTEN, MY CLAIMS ARE IRREFUTABLE, and your USELESSNESS in PROVING otherwise is PROVING this True.

If I say MY CLAIMS ARE IRREFUTABLE, then that in NO WAY is me saying absolutely ANY thing about 'me' being amazing AT ALL.

AND, as I just SAID and POINTED OUT;
ANY PERCEPTION of this has been of your OWN MAKING.

So, you are continuing to PROVE this here IRREFUTABLY True AS WELL.

Is why you are on all those ignore lists.

So, now you are SAYING and CLAIMING that I am on "others" ignore list BECAUSE I have been talking about 'me' being amazing, correct?

If no, then what IS correctly here, EXACTLY?

And, ONCE AGAIN, your ONLY ABILITY to ATTEMPT to RIDICULE or PUT the 'me' DOWN does NOT go UNNOTICED.

Are you going to tell god what a naughty boy I am?

WHAT is this 'God' THING, which you talk of and speak about here?

You spam the absolute fuck out of this forum, if I want to make a comment about you, I will do exactly as I please.

DO SO.

But by doing so you just PROVING FURTHER that you have absolutely NO ABILITY AT ALL to COUNTER or REFUTE what I SAY and CLAIM here, and that all you are ABLE TO DO is just 'TRY TO' RIDICULE and HUMILIATE.

If you can NOT argue AGAINST the words being USED, then I suggest you consider that a 'philosophy forum' is NOT for 'you'.

Also, what you call "spam" ARE JUST WORDS, which can NOT be REFUTED. And, your INABILITY to do so has PROVED, ALSO, this IRREFUTABLY True and Correct.

[FlashDangerpants]

The fact that you can't even tell that this ...

I have NEVER ONCE mentioned absolutely ANY thing about 'me' being 'amazing". And ANY PERCEPTION of this has been of your OWN MAKING.

Conflicts with this...

LISTEN, MY CLAIMS ARE IRREFUTABLE, and your USELESSNESS in PROVING otherwise is PROVING this True.

If I say MY CLAIMS ARE IRREFUTABLE, then that in NO WAY is me saying absolutely ANY thing about 'me' being amazing AT ALL.

AND, as I just SAID and POINTED OUT;
ANY PERCEPTION of this has been of your OWN MAKING.

Back at you. Your perception that awarding yourself honours for being the fount of irrefutable truths is not grandiose self-worship a false perception of your own making.

So, you are continuing to PROVE this here IRREFUTABLY True AS WELL.

Is why you are on all those ignore lists.

So, now you are SAYING and CLAIMING that I am on "others" ignore list BECAUSE I have been talking about 'me' being amazing, correct?

If no, then what IS correctly here, EXACTLY?

You would have to find some way to ask all the people who have you set to ignore for a full list of their reasons. I can fill you in with the headlines though:

• You are a ceaseless braggart, leaving even Advocate to eat dust.

• You are incredibly repetitive, which is the easiest way to become intensely boring.

• You are seldom if ever on topic and never have the slightsest respect for what is being discussed by others before you launch your takeover.

• You yourself are pretty much your only subject of conversation, which is weird and creepy.

And, ONCE AGAIN, your ONLY ABILITY to ATTEMPT to RIDICULE or PUT the 'me' DOWN does NOT go UNNOTICED.

Are you going to tell god what a naughty boy I am?

WHAT is this 'God' THING, which you talk of and speak about here?

You spam the absolute fuck out of this forum, if I want to make a comment about you, I will do exactly as I please.

DO SO.

But by doing so you just PROVING FURTHER that you have absolutely NO ABILITY AT ALL to COUNTER or REFUTE what I SAY and CLAIM here, and that all you are ABLE TO DO is just 'TRY TO' RIDICULE and HUMILIATE.

If you can NOT argue AGAINST the words being USED, then I suggest you consider that a 'philosophy forum' is NOT for 'you'.

Also, what you call "spam" ARE JUST WORDS, which can NOT be REFUTED. And, your INABILITY to do so has PROVED, ALSO, this IRREFUTABLY True and Correct.

Yeah

• You are seldom if ever on topic and never have the slightsest respect for what is being discussed by others before you launch your takeover.

[Age]

Even your taunts are weak and uninteresting, they provide no inspiration for a counter,

They are NOT 'taunts'. They are JUST Facts. Unlike your CLAIMS, which are OBVIOUSLY False, Wrong, AND Incorrect.

You tried to taunt me with a claim that I am weak and useless.

NO I DID NOT. This is just what you are ASSUMING and CONCLUDING. SEE, this is what HAPPENS and OCCURS when CLARITY is NOT OBTAINED, FIRST.

I WAS JUST EXPRESSING A Truth.

If you are NOT STRONG ENOUGH to CHALLENGE the ACTUAL WORDS that I USE before you, then 'you' ARE WEAK.

Thus can NOT be REFUTED.

That much is quite obvious and you are, by any standard, a liar.

PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE WHERE you have PERCEIVED I have LIED. THEN, we have SOME thing to AT LEAST LOOK AT. Until then YOUR CLAIMS could be said to be based on absolutely NOTHING AT ALL.

In fact what you are basing this CLAIM on here EXACTLY is SOLELY on YOUR OWN ASSUMPTIONS. WHICH, by the way, could be PROVEN to be IRREFUTABLY Wrong AND False, OBVIOUSLY.

It can't be a fact that I am factually useless, I could be put to use for many purposes such as using my skull as a flowerpot on my death.

BUT that is NOT 'you'.

ALSO, I have STIPULATED what you have been USELESS in. That is; COUNTERING, REFUTING, or even CHALLENGING my WORDS and CLAIMS here.

I NEVER mentioned absolutely ANY thing about the skull of that body being USELESS, or NOT, as a flowerpot after that body has stopped breathing and pumping blood.

I have also NEVER mentioned absolutely ANY thing about you being TOTALLY USELESS in regards to EVERY thing

You REALLY do NEED to concentrate on the ACTUAL WORDS that I USE here. That is IF you REALLY do want to find FAULT or FLAW in them.

You may believe that I am useless, but you are demonstrably incorrect when you assert it as a fact.

AND, IF you do NOT take ALL of the ACTUAL WORDS that I USE, into context, and ONLY LOOK AT a PART of them, like a CLOSED or NARROWED one would, and DOES do, then you WILL ONLY gather and SEE just a PART of what is ACTUALLY being SAID and CLAIMED, and sometimes only a VERY SMALL or TINY PART.

ALSO, I do NOT BELIEVE that you are TOTALLY USELESS in ALL fields. You have just SHOWN you ARE, in relation to what I have PREVIOUSLY CLEARLY SAID and STATED.

Oh, and by the way, if I recall CORRECTLY, you have previously nCORRECT some of what I have WRITTEN and SAID.

So now you are a proven liar.

LOL Here we ANOTHER PRIME EXAMPLE of just how QUICK the adult human beings, in the days when this was being written, would MAKE AN ASSUMPTION and JUMP to A CONCLUSION, which they would then BELEIVE was ABSOLUTELY and IRREFUTABLE True, WITHOUT ANY DISCUSSION NOR CLARIFICATION BEING MADE AT ALL FIRST.

Just so you are AWARE, what you ASSUME and/or BELIEVE IS True does NOT make 'it' so.

And it seems I can't be all that useless, having done the proving.

LOL
LOL
LOL

ANOTHER EXAMPLE of CONCLUSIONS BEING MADE, BEFORE DISCUSSIONS ARE HAD, and BEFORE CLARITY IS OBTAINED.

If you would like to have a Truly OPEN and Honest DISCUSSION WITH me, then just let me KNOW.

But going on what you have previously SAID and CLAIMED ABOUT 'me' I am NOT WORTHY of 'you' WASTING your time WITH 'me', correct?

[FlashDangerpants]

That much is quite obvious and you are, by any standard, a liar.

PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE WHERE you have PERCEIVED I have LIED.

There's nothing to debate. You tried to taunt me, then you lied about that.
It's done, you lied and got caught.

[Age]

The fact that you can't even tell that this ...

Conflicts with this...

If I say MY CLAIMS ARE IRREFUTABLE, then that in NO WAY is me saying absolutely ANY thing about 'me' being amazing AT ALL.

AND, as I just SAID and POINTED OUT;
ANY PERCEPTION of this has been of your OWN MAKING.

Back at you. Your perception that awarding yourself honours for being the fount of irrefutable truths is not grandiose self-worship a false perception of your own making.

1. I have NEVER awarded "myself" with ANY such thing. AGAIN, this is just YOUR PERCEPTION.

2. One has to PROVE that the so-called IRREFUTABLE Truths CAN BE REFUTED, BEFORE they could ACCURATELY CLAIM, that 'it' IS a "false perception"

So, you are continuing to PROVE this here IRREFUTABLY True AS WELL.

Is why you are on all those ignore lists.

So, now you are SAYING and CLAIMING that I am on "others" ignore list BECAUSE I have been talking about 'me' being amazing, correct?

If no, then what IS correctly here, EXACTLY?

You would have to find some way to ask all the people who have you set to ignore for a full list of their reasons.

Which is what I suggest you DO, BEFORE you make CLAIMS like you DID here. That way you will NOT end up being SO Wrong as it appears you here now.

I can fill you in with the headlines though:

• You are a ceaseless braggart, leaving even Advocate to eat dust.

• You are incredibly repetitive, which is the easiest way to become intensely boring.

• You are seldom if ever on topic and never have the slightsest respect for what is being discussed by others before you launch your takeover.

• You yourself are pretty much your only subject of conversation, which is weird and creepy.

ONCE AGAIN, I asked you a VERY SPECIFIC QUESTION, and, ONCE AGAIN, you FAILED TOTALLY in answering the ACTUAL QUESTION POSED to you. You have supplied NOTHING but DETRACTION and DEFLECTION.

ALSO, it appears that YOUR CLAiM here was AGAIN absolutely False, Wrong, AND Incorrect.

Furthermore, your CONTINUED TALKING ABOUT 'me' INSTEAD of AGAINST the WORDS I USE are, AGAIN, NOT going UNNOTICED.

By the way, they are just YOUR PERCEPTIONS, which do NOT necessarily have absolutely ANY thing AT ALL to do with what Is ACTUALLY True and Factual.

WHAT is this 'God' THING, which you talk of and speak about here?

YOU FAILED AGAIN

You spam the absolute fuck out of this forum, if I want to make a comment about you, I will do exactly as I please.

DO SO.

But by doing so you just PROVING FURTHER that you have absolutely NO ABILITY AT ALL to COUNTER or REFUTE what I SAY and CLAIM here, and that all you are ABLE TO DO is just 'TRY TO' RIDICULE and HUMILIATE.

If you can NOT argue AGAINST the words being USED, then I suggest you consider that a 'philosophy forum' is NOT for 'you'.

Also, what you call "spam" ARE JUST WORDS, which can NOT be REFUTED. And, your INABILITY to do so has PROVED, ALSO, this IRREFUTABLY True and Correct.

Yeah

• You are seldom if ever on topic and never have the slightsest respect for what is being discussed by others before you launch your takeover.

TALk ABOUT NOT answering CLARIFYING QUESTIONS posed to you, so talking OFF TOPIC and NOT having ANY respect AT ALL for what WAS being discussed. Thus, TAKING OVER.

I WAS talking WITH "uwot" about what I SEE are False Wrong, and Incorrect CONCLUSIONS in regards to what 'uwot" has arrived at, which you have NOT made just ONE mention of, and WHERE we have ENDED UP now, with YOUR take over can be CLEARLY SEEN.

Also, here we have ANOTHER PRIME EXAMPLE of how one can "read", and "see" things that REALLY are NOT there. This is due to them "reading" from the PRECONCEIVED IDEAS or BELIEFS instead of reading from thee Truly OPEN perspective.

[uwot]

The movement of the sun relative to an observer on earth might be 'evidence' to and for one with a pre-existing INTERPRETATION or BELIEF that the sun revolves around the earth.

It is also evidence to and for one with a pre-existing interpretation or belief that the Earth orbits the sun. It is also evidence for anyone with no pre-existing interpretation or belief; it's just one piece of evidence. The only thing that one piece of evidence proves is that there is evidence - Cogito ergo sum. At any moment, the only thing that is guaranteed is the experience present at that moment. You cannot prove anything, Melissa.

[Age]

That much is quite obvious and you are, by any standard, a liar.

PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE WHERE you have PERCEIVED I have LIED.

There's nothing to debate.

I KNOW there is NOTHING to 'debate' here.

I called you WEAK and SCARED because that is a Fact in regards to you WANTING TO and being ABLE TO CHALLENGE me on MY WORDS.

You tried to taunt me, then you lied about that.

I NEVER tried to 'taunt' you. I just expressed a Fact.

You are basing your 'lied' comment on your OWN ASSUMPTION and PERCEPTION, and you can NOT refute this.

It's done, you lied and got caught.

LOL

You carry on like "atla" when you are NOT ABLE to ACTUALLY CHALLENGE me on my ACTUAL WORDS.

You may NOT like what I SAY and POINT OUT but all the both of you can resort to is calling me a LIAR.

WHY do the BOTH of you NOT CHALLENGE me on the ACTUAL WORDS that I ACTUALLY USE, instead of only on what you BOTH ASSUME and/or BELIEVE I am SAYING and MEANING?

You are BOTH as WEAK and as INCAPABLE of EACH OTHER in this regard.

[Atla]

You carry on like "atla" when you are NOT ABLE to ACTUALLY CHALLENGE me on my ACTUAL WORDS.

You taunted him calling him "Truly WEAK", lied about it and got caught.
That you are a proven liar, comes much closer to being an "irrefutable fact", than the things you spout.

[Age]

The movement of the sun relative to an observer on earth might be 'evidence' to and for one with a pre-existing INTERPRETATION or BELIEF that the sun revolves around the earth.

It is also evidence to and for one with a pre-existing interpretation or belief that the Earth orbits the sun. It is also evidence for anyone with no pre-existing interpretation or belief; it's just one piece of evidence.

But 'it' is NOT ACTUAL 'evidence' that the sun revolves around the earth.

That 'it' is 'evidence' that the sun revolves around the earth is just an INTERPRETATION. As I have been SAYING and POINTING OUT here. Oh, and by the way, that INTERPRETATION IS a VERY and TOTALLY False, Wrong, and Incorrect INTERPRETATION.

Just like the INTERPRETATION that red shift 'data' is 'evidence' for a BEGINNING and EXPANDING Universe is a TOTALLY False, Wrong, AND Incorrect INTERPRETATION.

The only thing that one piece of evidence proves is that there is evidence - Cogito ergo sum. At any moment, the only thing that is guaranteed is the experience present at that moment. You cannot prove anything, Melissa.

So, that there are 'thoughts' existing can NOT be PROVEN "uwot"?

You REALLY do SAY some Truly ABSURD and CONTRADICTORY things.

[Age]

You carry on like "atla" when you are NOT ABLE to ACTUALLY CHALLENGE me on my ACTUAL WORDS.

You taunted him calling him "Truly WEAK", lied about it and got caught.

Here is ANOTHER one who MAKES CONCLUSIONS, based SOLELY on their OWN ASSUMPTIONS.

I am the ONLY One here who KNOWS, FOR SURE, what I AM DOING here. I am ALSO the ONLY One here who KNOWS, FOR SURE, EXACTLY, what CONTEXT I am SAYING things IN.

You, and ANY one ELSE, are absolutely FREE to ASSUME and GUESS what CONTEXT I SAY things IN, but YOUR ASSUMPTIONS and GUESSES will ALWAYS REMAIN just 'that'. That is; UNTIL CLARIFICATION IS SOUGHT and MADE. SO, UNTIL you OBTAIN CLARIFICATION your GUESSES and ASSUMPTIONS will OPEN to being QUESTIONED, and/or REFUTED.

I was NOT 'taunting'. I WAS EXPLAINING the reasons WHY it does NOT even try to CHALLENGE MY WORDS but INSTEAD talks ABOUT 'me' to "others".

I suggest you GAIN CLARIFICATION, FIRST, BEFORE you make ANY further CLAIMS, which you can NOT back up and support with ACTUAL PROOF.

That you are a proven liar, comes much closer to being an "irrefutable fact", than the things you spout.

LOL if only you KNEW.

If only you KNEW.

[Atla]

You carry on like "atla" when you are NOT ABLE to ACTUALLY CHALLENGE me on my ACTUAL WORDS.

You taunted him calling him "Truly WEAK", lied about it and got caught.

Here is ANOTHER one who MAKES CONCLUSIONS, based SOLELY on their OWN ASSUMPTIONS.

I am the ONLY One here who KNOWS, FOR SURE, what I AM DOING here. I am ALSO the ONLY One here who KNOWS, FOR SURE, EXACTLY, what CONTEXT I am SAYING things IN.

You, and ANY one ELSE, are absolutely FREE to ASSUME and GUESS what CONTEXT I SAY things IN, but YOUR ASSUMPTIONS and GUESSES will ALWAYS REMAIN just 'that'. That is; UNTIL CLARIFICATION IS SOUGHT and MADE. SO, UNTIL you OBTAIN CLARIFICATION your GUESSES and ASSUMPTIONS will OPEN to being QUESTIONED, and/or REFUTED.

I was NOT 'taunting'. I WAS EXPLAINING the reasons WHY it does NOT even try to CHALLENGE MY WORDS but INSTEAD talks ABOUT 'me' to "others".

I suggest you GAIN CLARIFICATION, FIRST, BEFORE you make ANY further CLAIMS, which you can NOT back up and support with ACTUAL PROOF.

That you are a proven liar, comes much closer to being an "irrefutable fact", than the things you spout.

LOL if only you KNEW.

If only you KNEW.

Lie - you were taunting. And lie - no, you don't know for sure what you are doing here.

[Age]

You taunted him calling him "Truly WEAK", lied about it and got caught.

Here is ANOTHER one who MAKES CONCLUSIONS, based SOLELY on their OWN ASSUMPTIONS.

I am the ONLY One here who KNOWS, FOR SURE, what I AM DOING here. I am ALSO the ONLY One here who KNOWS, FOR SURE, EXACTLY, what CONTEXT I am SAYING things IN.

You, and ANY one ELSE, are absolutely FREE to ASSUME and GUESS what CONTEXT I SAY things IN, but YOUR ASSUMPTIONS and GUESSES will ALWAYS REMAIN just 'that'. That is; UNTIL CLARIFICATION IS SOUGHT and MADE. SO, UNTIL you OBTAIN CLARIFICATION your GUESSES and ASSUMPTIONS will OPEN to being QUESTIONED, and/or REFUTED.

I was NOT 'taunting'. I WAS EXPLAINING the reasons WHY it does NOT even try to CHALLENGE MY WORDS but INSTEAD talks ABOUT 'me' to "others".

I suggest you GAIN CLARIFICATION, FIRST, BEFORE you make ANY further CLAIMS, which you can NOT back up and support with ACTUAL PROOF.

That you are a proven liar, comes much closer to being an "irrefutable fact", than the things you spout.

LOL if only you KNEW.

If only you KNEW.

Lie - you were taunting. And lie - no, you don't know for sure what you are doing here.

LOL

Here is a PRIME EXAMPLE of just how "SURE" the adult human being was in their OWN made up ASSUMPTIONS and BELIEFS, back in the days when this was being written.

This one is so "SURE" of itself that it ACTUALLY BELIEVES that it KNEW MORE of what is being thought within another head than the ACTUAL one, in that head.

These human beings were SO BLINDED by their OWN BELIEFS and ASSUMPTIONS that they could NOT even RECOGNIZE just how STUPID and ABSURD some of their CLAIMS REALLY WERE.