Page 16 of 25
Re: Continuous motion possible or impossible
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 3:19 am
by simplicity
bahman wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 10:30 pm
simplicity wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 6:39 pm
bahman wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 6:40 pm
But something cannot be and not be at the same instant.
The introduction of time into any equation may make all things work [but only within our primitive view of the Universe]. Delete the same and you will discover that all things are possible.
Continuous motion, in general, is impossible, including changes in time.
Can you tell me something that is NOT in continuous motion?
Re: Continuous motion possible or impossible
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 7:24 pm
by Sculptor
bahman wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 10:30 pm
simplicity wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 6:39 pm
bahman wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 6:40 pm
But something cannot be and not be at the same instant.
The introduction of time into any equation may make all things work [but only within our primitive view of the Universe]. Delete the same and you will discover that all things are possible.
Continuous motion, in general, is impossible, including changes in time.
There is nothing you can see; nothing you can know; and nothing you have experienced that is motionless.
i.e. stillness is impossible
Everything in the universe is in motion.
Re: Continuous motion possible or impossible
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 8:33 pm
by simplicity
Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 7:24 pmThere is nothing you can see; nothing you can know; and nothing you have experienced that is motionless.
i.e. stillness is impossible
Everything in the universe is in motion.
I knew there was something that we could agree on 100%!
Re: Continuous motion possible or impossible
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 10:30 pm
by bahman
Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 7:24 pm
bahman wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 10:30 pm
simplicity wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 6:39 pm
The introduction of time into any equation may make all things work [but only within our primitive view of the Universe]. Delete the same and you will discover that all things are possible.
Continuous motion, in general, is impossible, including changes in time.
There is nothing you can see; nothing you can know; and nothing you have experienced that is motionless.
i.e. stillness is impossible
Everything in the universe is in motion.
What you experience is not proof of continuous motion. Remember the example of film.
Re: Continuous motion possible or impossible
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2021 12:18 am
by Sculptor
bahman wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 10:30 pm
Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 7:24 pm
bahman wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 10:30 pm
Continuous motion, in general, is impossible, including changes in time.
There is nothing you can see; nothing you can know; and nothing you have experienced that is motionless.
i.e. stillness is impossible
Everything in the universe is in motion.
What you experience is not proof of continuous motion. Remember the example of film.
As the earth revolves you are an idiot.
Re: Continuous motion possible or impossible
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2021 12:54 am
by bahman
Sculptor wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 12:18 am
bahman wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 10:30 pm
Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 7:24 pm
There is nothing you can see; nothing you can know; and nothing you have experienced that is motionless.
i.e. stillness is impossible
Everything in the universe is in motion.
What you experience is not proof of continuous motion. Remember the example of film.
As the earth revolves you are an idiot.
Yes, but it moves on a grid where the distance between two points is very small.
Re: Continuous motion possible or impossible
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2021 8:00 am
by Age
bahman wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 10:50 pm
Age wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 10:25 pm
bahman wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:47 pm
Is there any neural net in CPU?
What do you mean here? Like when flashes on a computer screen are seen when the human head, of living and thinking human body, is put in a magnetic resonance imaging device?
If yes, then I do not know.
Has a central processing unit even been put into a magnetic resonance imaging device, while the central processing unit has been switched on, and is working?
Don't you know what a neural net is? Do you know what a neuron is? If yes then a neural net is a net of neurons.
Is that thee One and ONLY definition?
Also, and ONCE AGAIN, what can be CLEARLY SEEN here is that while a human being has and holds a BELIEF, then they are NOT OPEN to SEEING what thee ACTUAL Reality IS, around them.
I asked you a CLARIFYING QUESTION, so do you KNOW WHY you did NOT answer it?
Re: Continuous motion possible or impossible
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2021 11:51 am
by Sculptor
bahman wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 12:54 am
Sculptor wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 12:18 am
bahman wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 10:30 pm
What you experience is not proof of continuous motion. Remember the example of film.
As the earth revolves you are an idiot.
Yes, but it moves on a grid where the distance between two points is very small.
The only thing that is very small here is your brain
Re: Continuous motion possible or impossible
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2021 12:00 pm
by bahman
Sculptor wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 11:51 am
bahman wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 12:54 am
Sculptor wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 12:18 am
As the earth revolves you are an idiot.
Yes, but it moves on a grid where the distance between two points is very small.
The only thing that is very small here is your brain
So that is your counterargument?
Re: Continuous motion possible or impossible
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2021 12:04 pm
by bahman
Age wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 8:00 am
bahman wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 10:50 pm
Age wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 10:25 pm
What do you mean here? Like when flashes on a computer screen are seen when the human head, of living and thinking human body, is put in a magnetic resonance imaging device?
If yes, then I do not know.
Has a central processing unit even been put into a magnetic resonance imaging device, while the central processing unit has been switched on, and is working?
Don't you know what a neural net is? Do you know what a neuron is? If yes then a neural net is a net of neurons.
Is that thee One and ONLY definition?
Also, and ONCE AGAIN, what can be CLEARLY SEEN here is that while a human being has and holds a BELIEF, then they are NOT OPEN to SEEING what thee ACTUAL Reality IS, around them.
I asked you a CLARIFYING QUESTION, so do you KNOW WHY you did NOT answer it?
Yes, it is only a definition. Your questions are completely irrelevant to the topic.
Re: Continuous motion possible or impossible
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2021 12:39 pm
by Sculptor
bahman wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 12:00 pm
Sculptor wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 11:51 am
bahman wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 12:54 am
Yes, but it moves on a grid where the distance between two points is very small.
The only thing that is very small here is your brain
So that is your counterargument?
A counter argument is not required when no argument of substance has been presented.
Re: Continuous motion possible or impossible
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2021 12:42 pm
by bahman
Sculptor wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 12:39 pm
bahman wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 12:00 pm
Sculptor wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 11:51 am
The only thing that is very small here is your brain
So that is your counterargument?
A counter argument is not required when no argument of substance has been presented.
But I have a few arguments against the continuous motion: 1) The OP, 2)
here, etc.
Re: Continuous motion possible or impossible
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2021 2:19 pm
by Sculptor
bahman wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 12:42 pm
Sculptor wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 12:39 pm
bahman wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 12:00 pm
So that is your counterargument?
A counter argument is not required when no argument of substance has been presented.
But I have a few arguments against the continuous motion: 1) The OP, 2)
here, etc.
Re: Continuous motion possible or impossible
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2021 2:21 pm
by bahman
Sculptor wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 2:19 pm
bahman wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 12:42 pm
Sculptor wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 12:39 pm
A counter argument is not required when no argument of substance has been presented.
But I have a few arguments against the continuous motion: 1) The OP, 2)
here, etc.
That is your counterargument?
Re: Continuous motion possible or impossible
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2021 2:23 pm
by Sculptor
bahman wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 2:21 pm
Sculptor wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 2:19 pm
bahman wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 12:42 pm
But I have a few arguments against the continuous motion: 1) The OP, 2)
here, etc.
That is your counterargument?
A counter argument is not required when no argument of substance has been presented.