Philosophy Now Forum

Dalek Prime wrote:

SpheresOfBalance wrote:

manden wrote:Simple answer : the religions are human inventions and imaginations
OK, got it!
- and in the main ( what concerns the TRUE God , the real creator of the universe - more of himself is not recognizable, and he is not God of any religion ) F A L S E ! ! !
Come now, you can do better than that, I know English is your second language, but I know you can do better, please expound!

And the human ideologies ( like capitalism ) can the mankind also not bring forward , of course ( only backward) !
OK, I think I tend to agree!

AND SO WE HAVE THIS CATASTROPHAL MANKIND AND WORLD !
Yeah mankind is rather flawed, much like your English, which is far better than my second language, as I have none. We're all fucked!

But pray tell, with things as they are, what's your solution?

Antinatalism, dumbass. Ceasing procreation until the problems melt away with us. Mine works. What solution do you have that's guaranteed to work?

Lacewing wrote:It's robotic, detached, and creepy... and like talking with something that doesn't have a soul/spirit to connect to.

SpheresOfBalance wrote:

Dalek Prime wrote:

SpheresOfBalance wrote:But pray tell, with things as they are, what's your solution?

Antinatalism, dumbass. Ceasing procreation until the problems melt away with us. Mine works. What solution do you have that's guaranteed to work?

Cum now, mayleck soft, I thought you weren't going to pay any attention to me? My decision to make, not your's. And as I told someone else before, my attention is always called when a dog follows me around the forum, barking at me, and trying to sniff my bollocks.

Your solution is asinine, attempting to counter the universes' decisions makes you a moron, as it can't be done! The universe does not make decisions; sentients do. The universe only unfolds. As to "can't be done", I didn't procreate, as 20% of the West didn't. So how is it impossible for the rest of humanity to do the same, when clearly it can be done, though I grant you, unlikely to be done?
Are you going to try and procure a nuke, to fix this problem, and you called me Dr Mengele, You are the only one suggesting or insinuating murder here. Not having children is clearly not murder. Look at my enclosed quote again, and tell me where I suggest killing anyone. I believe that is part of what you are not understanding; the difference between not starting existence, as opposed to ending it once its started. You mistake antinatalism as advocating the latter, when it only advocates the former. sheesh! I can clearly see that you don't know whether you're coming or going, huh?

Aristotle wrote:Wretched, ephemeral race, children of chance and tribulation, why do you force me to tell you the very thing which it would be most profitable for you not to hear? The very best thing is utterly beyond your reach: not to have been born, not to be, to be nothing. However, the second best thing for you is: to die soon.

manden wrote:We have not and we cannot judge the real creator of the universe , whose thinking and logic is many billion times above our !

Obvious Leo wrote:I've been wondering the same thing myself, arising. Logic is simply a binary proposition in that a statement is either logical or it isn't. Being a little bit logical is probably like being a little bit pregnant.

manden wrote:The real creator of the universe looks at us as his children .

Dalek Prime wrote:
PS. Would you care to know who else agrees with me? Another moron by the name of Aristotle, one of the founders of Western philosophy who, as it turns out, also happened to be an antinatalist..

manden wrote:The real creator of the universe looks at us as his children . Every human being can find the way to him , it must only REALLY WANT !