Thinking Straight About Curved Space

[surreptitious57]

The Steady State theory has long since been abandoned as a credible hypothesis and moreso after the
rival Big Bang theory was formulated by Hawking and Penrose. The Universe is not in a steady state at
all as it is actually expanding beyond light speed in all directions because of dark energy. This is not a
violation of general relativity as that only applies to within the Universe and not to the Universe itself

Can you explain exactly what information is in your scenario and how that becomes energy and matter
If it is physical [ and it can not be anything else by implication ] then how can it not initially be matter

[Scott Mayers]

The Steady State theory has long since been abandoned as a credible hypothesis and moreso after the
rival Big Bang theory was formulated by Hawking and Penrose. The Universe is not in a steady state at
all as it is actually expanding beyond light speed in all directions because of dark energy. This is not a
violation of general relativity as that only applies to within the Universe and not to the Universe itself

Can you explain exactly what information is in your scenario and how that becomes energy and matter
If it is physical [ and it can not be anything else by implication ] then how can it not initially be matter

No, at least not here with realistic depth here. I hinted at it earlier today here but cannot do this without using illustrations, mathematical symbols, and a essential understanding of my logic using 'contradiction' as a function within it. I already notice how resistant most here are to my logic already and so I would only be expending unnecessary energy to try without getting past this barrier.

Steady State was abandoned prematurely as I've already been discussing everywhere here on this site. To save me energy, please look up what I've written so far.

My theory is complete but only in a first draft form. I'm still trying to figure out how best to approach this in the most effective way that could be followed by most. Until then, you'll have to simply default patience. I WILL NOT grant favor to certain theories that I'm confident are wrong even though I am unable to prove this for you or others here. But I will continue to discuss the initial intellectual concepts involved that are needed to follow it later.

Pre-requisite understanding of contradiction in logic is one factor. Another is understanding how an initial beginning does not require anything at all as the first proposition. These two things are necessary to understand before I even have a hope of getting you or others to follow the reasoning.