Page 15 of 39

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2011 11:50 pm
by Typist
chaz wyman wrote:The only way I can prove that I will change when you stop being a stupid moron, is whan you stop being a stupid moron, you moron!!!
He he! Thank you for proving me right with every word you type. Like shooting fish in a barrel. I must be getting lazy in my old age!

I must be a STOOOOOOOOPID MORON!!

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 12:10 am
by Arising_uk
Ever notice how you avoid all the points other than the ones that confirm your beliefs?

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 12:14 am
by Typist
But what time is it? Why won't you answer the question???

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 1:02 am
by evangelicalhumanist
Typist wrote:But what time is it? Why won't you answer the question???
At time I write this, it is 20:02 and several seconds on August 20, 2011. When you read it, it won't be. Therefore, there is no possible answer to the question in this context.

That happens a lot.

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 1:18 am
by chaz wyman
Typist wrote:
chaz wyman wrote:The only way I can prove that I will change when you stop being a stupid moron, is whan you stop being a stupid moron, you moron!!!
He he! Thank you for proving me right with every word you type. Like shooting fish in a barrel. I must be getting lazy in my old age!

I must be a STOOOOOOOOPID MORON!!

So what are the answers to those questions?

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 1:47 am
by chaz wyman
evangelicalhumanist wrote:
Typist wrote:But what time is it? Why won't you answer the question???
At time I write this, it is 20:02 and several seconds on August 20, 2011. When you read it, it won't be. Therefore, there is no possible answer to the question in this context.

That happens a lot.
Image

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 9:56 am
by Arising_uk
Typist wrote:But what time is it? Why won't you answer the question???
09:55, I do. When will you be doing the same?

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 11:27 am
by chaz wyman
Arising_uk wrote:
Typist wrote:But what time is it? Why won't you answer the question???
09:55, I do. When will you be doing the same?

Stop feeding the troll

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 12:27 pm
by Typist
chaz wyman wrote:Stop feeding the troll
Your theme continues.

First I was a moron, now I'm troll.

What negative name shall you call me next?

The suspense is exciting!!

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 12:28 pm
by Typist
09:55, I do.
But that's the time when you posted, not the time now!! You're using tricky tactics to CONTINUE TO DODGE THE QUESTION!!!

Are you afraid to answer the question, is that it?

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 3:24 pm
by chaz wyman
Typist wrote:
chaz wyman wrote:Stop feeding the troll
Your theme continues.

First I was a moron, now I'm troll.

What negative name shall you call me next?

The suspense is exciting!!
I'll call you anything that is accurate.

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 3:28 pm
by Typist
You're gonna call me stuff!!!

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 8:49 pm
by Arising_uk
Typist wrote:Are you afraid to answer the question, is that it?
Which question? As I answer all yours, shame you cannot reciprocate.

You keep asking me the time and I keep telling you, whats the problem?

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 9:10 pm
by melonkali
Typist wrote:You're gonna call me stuff!!!
Is it not still true that one only resorts to argumentum ad hominem when one has no legitimate case or point of debate? And is not the intention of a rude and bellicose argumentum ad hominem attack to discourage your opponent from further discussion. It worked with me in a recent thread where **** and I tangled -- I ended up losing my temper, making a rude remark which I regretted and felt I had to apologize for, then I bowed out of the exchange.

From what I've read in this thread, I believe your assertions have been interesting and well presented. So regardless of whatever further abuse and name calling gets thrown at you, in my opinion you've made a good point in this thread.

And now I'd better go hide before rude and juvenile insults start flying in my direction!

rebecca

Re: aphilosophy

Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 9:34 pm
by Arising_uk
melonkali wrote:...
From what I've read in this thread, I believe your assertions have been interesting and well presented. So regardless of whatever further abuse and name calling gets thrown at you, in my opinion you've made a good point in this thread ...
Get used to them rebecca as you're going to be hearing the same ones every time and no replies to any questions. Its why one of us started this thread about Typists 'aphilosophy' since he wouldn't, to try and actually get some answers.